Distraction, if consistent, does not hinder learning

December 9, 2014, Brown University
Reflected in the screen and with stylus in hand, postdoctoral researcher Hee Yeon demonstrates an experiment suggesting that distraction need not be absent to promote learning and recall -- it need only be consistent. Credit: Mike Cohea/Brown University

Maybe distraction is not always the enemy of learning. It turns out in surprising Brown University psychology research that inconsistent distraction is the real problem. As long as our attention is as divided when we have to recall a motor skill as it was when we learned it, we'll do just fine, according to the new study.

Most learned motor tasks—driving, playing sports or music, even walking again after injury—occur with other things going on. Given the messiness of our existence, said lead researcher Joo-Hyun Song, assistant professor of cognitive, linguistic, and , the brain may be able to integrate the division of during learning as a cue that allows for better when a similar cue is present.

"The underlying assumption people have is that divided attention is bad—if you divide your attention, your performance should get worse," Song said. "But learning has a later, skill-retrieval part. People haven't studied what's the role of divided attention in later."

Consistent distraction

Now Song and neuroscientist Patrick Bédard have. Their study, published in the journal Psychological Sciences, involved two main experiments.

In the first, 48 volunteers manipulated a stylus on a touchpad to virtually reach for targets on a computer screen. The trick to learn was that the computer would bend the virtual world by 45 degrees, so the subjects had to compensate. Meanwhile some volunteers also had to perform another task, which was to count symbols that moved by on the screen as they made their awkward reaches. Other volunteers saw the symbols but were told they could ignore them.

Later the subjects would demonstrate their new reaching skills, some with and some without again having to count symbols.

The subjects were therefore split into five groups based on whether they had to endure the symbol distraction either during learning or during recall and to what degree (high or low). For example, the "none-none" group never dealt with the symbols, the "high-none" group were distracted when learning but not during recall and the "high-high" group had their attention equally divided at both times.

When the researchers looked at how well the subjects in each group recalled the task, they found that the high-high group did as well as the none-none group, while the high-none, low-none and none-high groups all struggled. It was as if those who were denied the same degree of distraction during testing as they experienced during learning suffered a disadvantage.

A second surprise

A second experiment showed that the distraction at recall didn't have to be the same kind as the distraction during learning. Song and Bédard put another 50 subjects through a similar set of experiments, but this time the distraction during recall for some volunteers was shapes, for others it was shapes of differing brightness, and for still others it was sounds.

In the end it didn't seem to matter what the distraction was during recall as long as subjects had had a distraction during learning. Everybody who had been distracted in both learning and recall performed better than those who were distracted while learning but undistracted during recall.

Notably, the effect Song measured didn't depend on keeping the external context, for instance the ambient surroundings, consistent. There just had to be the same degree of distraction at both times. In this regard, the study is not merely recapitulating the well-accepted observation that people can remember better when they are in the same context as before. If anything, she said, it suggests that divided attention is more powerful than external context in prompting the kind of recall measured.

Can learning improve?

Song is continuing to study the affects of attention on learning. In her lab she's varying the timing of the distraction, for example.

Another task is to figure out what might be going on in the brain to allow divided attention to be a boost for recall, rather than a hindrance for learning.

"For now my working hypothesis is that this creates an internal representation in which divided attention is associated with the motor learning process, so it can work as an internal cue," Song said.

Song said she is curious about whether understanding the effect could improve rehabilitation. It may be better, for instance, to help patients learn to walk not only in the clinic, but amid the degree of they would encounter on their neighborhood sidewalk.

"Without consideration of attentional contexts in real-life situations, the success of and rehabilitation programs may be undermined," she said.

Explore further: With rewards, we remember more than we should

Related Stories

With rewards, we remember more than we should

November 17, 2014
A new study provides an illustration of the power that reward has over learning and memory. In an experiment reported in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, mere sips of apple juice overcame a well-documented ...

Scientists make older adults less forgetful in memory tests

February 21, 2013
Scientists at Baycrest Health Sciences' Rotman Research Institute (RRI) and the University of Toronto's Psychology Department have found compelling evidence that older adults can eliminate forgetfulness and perform as well ...

Elderly brains learn, but maybe too much

November 26, 2014
A new study led by Brown University reports that older learners retained the mental flexibility needed to learn a visual perception task but were not as good as younger people at filtering out irrelevant information.

Study finds that learning by repetition impairs recall of details

June 23, 2014
When learning, practice doesn't always make perfect.

Daydreamers are also distracted by the world around them, new study finds

August 21, 2013
Look! A seagull. I once dropped an ice-cream in Eastbourne. Now, where was I? Oh yes…

Scientists discover brain's anti-distraction system

April 15, 2014
(Medical Xpress)—Two Simon Fraser University psychologists have made a brain-related discovery that could revolutionize doctors' perception and treatment of attention-deficit disorders.

Recommended for you

Can we really tell if it's love at first sight?

May 25, 2018
Long-term and short-term relationships are obviously different from each other. Some people are the type you'd want to marry; others are good primarily for the sex.

People with family history of alcoholism release more dopamine in expectation of alcohol

May 23, 2018
People with a family history of alcohol use disorder (AUD) release more dopamine in the brain's main reward center in response to the expectation of alcohol than people diagnosed with the disorder, or healthy people without ...

Why we fail to understand our smartphone use

May 23, 2018
Checking your phone dozens of times a day indicates unconscious behaviour, which is "extremely repetitive" say psychologists.

Study confirms that men and women tend to adopt different navigation strategies

May 23, 2018
When navigating in a known environment, men prefer to take shortcuts to reach their destination more quickly, while women tend to use routes they know. This is according to Alexander Boone of UC Santa Barbara in the US who ...

Early life trauma in men associated with reduced levels of sperm microRNAs

May 22, 2018
Exposure to early life trauma can lead to poor physical and mental health in some individuals, which can be passed on to their children. Studies in mice show that at least some of the effects of stress can be transmitted ...

Training compassion 'muscle' may boost brain's resilience to others' suffering

May 22, 2018
It can be distressing to witness the pain of family, friends or even strangers going through a hard time. But what if, just like strengthening a muscle or learning a new hobby, we could train ourselves to be more compassionate ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

winthrom
not rated yet Dec 09, 2014
Then students who study in distracting environments and test in non-distracting environments are at a disadvantage compared to students who study and test in non-distracting environments.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.