Definition of acute kidney injury may misclassify patients

Definition of acute kidney injury may misclassify patients
The likelihood of false-positive acute kidney injury diagnoses increases with more frequent measurement, and when the true creatinine is higher.

Yale researchers found that the current definition of acute kidney injury may be causing patients without the condition to be misclassified.

Their research, published in the Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, confirms the limitations of the consensus definition for a condition that affects hundreds of thousands of patients in the United States each year.

Currently, is diagnosed when the serum creatinine concentration, which measures levels of a metabolism byproduct in the blood, rises. Small increases in SCr may indicate acute kidney injury—a sudden loss of kidney function—that requires early treatment, according to internationally accepted criteria. But, the researchers note, variations in the quality and frequency of lab tests can contribute to false-positive results and misdiagnosis of kidney disease.  

To assess the false-positive rate for acute kidney injury, assistant professor of nephrology Dr. F. Perry Wilson and his co-authors used clinical data from more than 2,000 patients to simulate SCr testing. Accounting for variations in labs and biology, they determined the proportion of patients who would be erroneously diagnosed. "The basic finding is that overall the false-positive rate is 8%, and in those patients with chronic , the false-positive rate is 30.5%," said Wilson.

Such false positives could result in unnecessary interventions and even further kidney damage, he said. "It's clear that especially in this population of , this definition of acute is inadequate. We need to create new definitions."

Explore further

Scientists confirm better test for acute kidney injury in children

Provided by Yale University
Citation: Definition of acute kidney injury may misclassify patients (2015, September 7) retrieved 21 May 2022 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors