Restructuring affects staff well-being regardless of job cuts

February 1, 2016, University of East Anglia
Credit: George Hodan/public domain

Restructuring in organisations has a mainly negative effect on the welfare of employees regardless of whether there are job losses, according to a new study involving the University of East Anglia (UEA).

Researchers found no clear differences in the impact on well-being between restructuring with and without cutting staff numbers.

The finding, published in the journal Work and Stress, follows a review of 39 studies on restructuring published over 12 years which covered the public sector, such as government and healthcare, and private sector, including industry, transport, finance and services. The types of restructuring included downsizing, closure, mergers, change in ownership or privatisation, or a combination of more than one type.

The review's authors, from UEA's Norwich Business School and the Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), examined the differences between the short and longer term effects of restructuring, for example from shortly after the announcement to during and after the process. They also looked at which factors, such as job characteristics, those related to the restructuring process and individual characteristics, affect the relationship between restructuring and well-being.

Not all employees experienced the negative effects to the same extent and a few studies found positive changes in well-being over time, indicating a recovery of well-being or a positive impact of restructuring. This may have been related to the type of restructuring and the way it was managed, or due to the fact that the most negative impact had already happened.

However, the majority of the studies showed negative changes over time, both during the restructuring and in the post-restructuring period, with and without any downsizing. Some groups of workers reacted less negatively, for example those with a high organisational status before restructuring and workers with a change in workgroup.

Low income employees were identified as a possible vulnerable group, while less qualified employees, non-manual workers and permanent employees were among those affected more negatively or differently by restructuring.

The review argues that designing and implementing effective interventions related to restructuring will become more and more important and recommends more support and training for all those involved in the process.

Co-author Karina Nielsen, professor of work and organisational psychology at Norwich Business School, said: "Restructuring is a significant characteristic of working life in both private and public companies and a large part of the working population will face one, but probably more restructuring events in their career. It is therefore important to understand the effects of restructuring and the impact of the way the process is managed on employee well-being, in order to reduce the for employees who continue to work at the organisations afterwards.

"Our findings show that it doesn't really matter whether people are laid off or not, it still has a negative impact. Those employees who stay on at the organisation might have to do tasks they are not familiar with and they don't necessarily get the training. They need other competencies."

The researchers found that job characteristics such as higher physical demands and less job control decreased well-being, while factors related to the restructuring process, such as communication, provision of change-related information and training impacted positively. Individual characteristics found to have a on well-being included job insecurity, employee adjustment to change, perceived impact of change and negative change experience.

Prof Nielsen said: "The characteristics of the restructuring process, such as fairness of procedures, communication and change management in general have been found to have an impact on worker well-being. Some groups of workers react less negatively, for example if they have more chance of influencing the process. The key point is how you manage the change. Make sure people have control over their jobs, that there is good communication and the right kind of training.

"Organisations, managers, and employees should be supported in dealing with changes in a healthy way, for example by training, coaching and other on-the-job programmes aimed at individual, group and management level. Researchers and occupational and human resource management practitioners should work together in developing interventions and evaluating the intervention process and its impact on well-being and company results."

The authors defined as changes that affected at least a whole organisational sector or an entire company, and that were initiated for economic or performance reasons. Regards well-being, as well as psychological and physical symptoms they looked at job-related experiences such as job satisfaction and attachment, as well as satisfaction with pay or co-workers.

Explore further: BlackBerry cuts jobs as part of turnaround plan

More information: 'The impact of restructuring on employee well-being: a systematic review of longitudinal studies', Tanja de Jong, Noortje Wiezer, Marjolein de Weerd, Karina Nielsen, Pauliina Mattila-Holappa and Zosia Mocka??o is published in Work and Stress.

Related Stories

BlackBerry cuts jobs as part of turnaround plan

July 21, 2015
BlackBerry Ltd. announced another round of job cuts Tuesday as it deals with weak smartphone sales and pushes ahead with a restructuring plan.

Research reveals main reasons why people go to work when ill

November 9, 2015
High job demands, stress and job insecurity are among the main reasons why people go to work when they are ill, according to new research by an academic at the University of East Anglia (UEA).

DuPont moves ahead on job cuts ahead of Dow merger

December 29, 2015
DuPont will cut 1,700 jobs in its home state of Delaware and thousands more globally as it prepares for its merger with Dow Chemical.

Recommended for you

Students more likely to eat school breakfast when given extra time, new study finds

August 18, 2018
Primary school students are more likely to eat a nutritional breakfast when given 10 extra minutes to do so, according to a new study by researchers at Virginia Tech and Georgia Southern University.

Like shark attack and the lottery, unconscious bias influences cancer screening

August 17, 2018
What do shark attack, the lottery and ovarian cancer screening having in common? It turns out our judgments about these things are all influenced by unconscious bias.

Phantom odors: One American in 15 smells odors that aren't there, study finds

August 16, 2018
Imagine the foul smell of an ash tray or burning hair. Now imagine if these kinds of smells were present in your life, but without a source. A new study finds that 1 in 15 Americans (or 6.5 percent) over the age of 40 experiences ...

US drug overdose deaths surge amid fentanyl scourge

August 16, 2018
US drug overdose deaths surged to nearly 72,000 last year, as addicts increasingly turn to extremely powerful synthetic opioid fentanyl as the supply of prescription painkillers has tightened.

Parental life span predicts daughters living to 90 without chronic disease or disability

August 15, 2018
Researchers at the University of California San Diego School of Medicine report that women whose mothers lived to at least age 90 were more likely to also live to 90, free of serious diseases and disabilities.

Eating breakfast burns more carbs during exercise and accelerates metabolism for next meal

August 15, 2018
Eating breakfast before exercise may "prime" the body to burn carbohydrates during exercise and more rapidly digest food after working out, University of Bath researchers have found.


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.