Permit female genital 'nicks' that respect culture/religion but don't harm, say experts

February 22, 2016

A small surgical 'nick' or minimalist procedures that slightly change the look, but not the function or sensory capacity of a young woman's external genitalia, should be legally permitted as a compromise solution to the vexed issue of FGM, argue gynaecologists in the Journal of Medical Ethics.

This more nuanced approach would uphold cultural and religious traditions without sacrificing the health and wellbeing of girls and young women, contend the US authors.

Despite 30 years of campaigning, the practice of cutting women's genitalia continues to flourish in many African countries and in immigrant African communities elsewhere. To date, attempts to stamp it out with legislation have failed, and may instead be driving it underground, they suggest.

"We are not arguing that any procedure on the female genitalia is desirable," they emphasise. "Rather, we only argue that certain procedures ought to be tolerated by liberal societies."

To begin with, the term 'female genital mutilation' (FGM) should be replaced with the less emotive 'female genital alteration' (FGA) to reflect the different types of procedure and their associated risks, and to minimise 'demonisation' of important cultural practices, they say.

FGM is not an appropriate term to use for the type of procedures they advocate, which are akin to cosmetic dentistry (orthodontics), breast implants, or the type of vaginal lip sculpting (labiaplasty) "for which affluent women pay thousands of dollars," they insist.

Current categorisation covers four types of female genital cutting, with type IV the most invasive and dangerous. But the authors call for a new system of categorisation that is based on the effects of the procedure rather than the process.

Category 1 would include procedures that should have no long lasting effects on the appearance or function of the genitalia, if performed properly: an example would be a small nick in the vulvar skin.

Category 2 would include procedures that change the appearance slightly but which are not expected to have any lasting effects on reproductive capacity or sexual fulfilment. Examples include pulling back the hood of the clitoris and labiaplasty.

Categories 3-5 would include procedures, such as clitoris removal and vaginal cauterisation that maim or harm and impair sexual fulfilment, pregnancy and childbirth. These should be banned, they say.

Categories 1 and 2 are no different to , which is rarely performed for therapeutic benefit, but which is tolerated and legal in liberal societies, the authors argue.

And restricting these categories of FGA is "culturally insensitive and supremacist and discriminatory towards women," they contend.

Rather, permitting this compromise would better protect girls and from the long term harms of the more severe forms of female genital cutting, they suggest.

"In order to better protect female children from the long term harms of categories 3 and 4 of FGA, we must adopt a more nuanced position that acknowledges that categories 1 and 2 are different in that they are not associated with long term medical risks, are culturally sensitive, do not discriminate on the basis of gender and do not violate human rights," they conclude.

But in one of a series of commentaries in response to this paper, Professor Ruth Macklin of Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, insists that there is no parity between categories 1 and 2 FGA and male circumcision.

"That may be true regarding the degree of harm the procedure causes, but it is not true of the origins or the continued symbolic meaning of FGA as a necessity for being an 'acceptable woman'," she explains. "There is no doubt that in whatever form, FGA has its origin and purpose in controlling women."

And she concludes: "Cultural change proceeds slowly. But with strong support from non-governmental organisations, especially those comprising local and regional women, a cultural tradition designed to control women—even in its least harmful form—is best abandoned."

In another commentary, Brian D Earp, visiting scholar at the Hastings Center, Bioethics Research Institute in New York, argues that permitting minimalist FGA would generate a litany of legal, regulatory, medical, and sexual problems, leading to "a fiasco."

Rather than continuing to tolerate male circumcision, and using this as a benchmark for allowing 'minor' forms of FGA, it may instead be time to consider taking a less tolerant stance towards both procedures, he says.

"Ultimately, I suggest that children of whatever sex or gender should be free from having healthy parts of their most intimate sexual organs either damaged or removed, before they can understand what is at stake in such an intervention and agree to it themselves," he writes.

In a further commentary, Dr Arianne Shahvisi, of the Department of Ethics at the University of Sussex, says that a minimalist approach to FGA is unlikely to fulfil the intentions of the procedure—to change the aesthetic appearance of the female genitalia, and to control women's sexual appetites.

And she wonders why the authors don't take the opportunity to recommend a more minimalist approach to male circumcision.

"Rites of passage are important to all of us, but one must not cause irreversible changes to the body of another person without their consent," she writes.

Finally, in a linked editorial, Dr Michael Dunn, of the Ethox Centre, University of Oxford, points out "The main argument is controversial, but its airing on the pages of the journal has a clear purpose: by subjecting FGM in its many forms to ethical analysis, we will be in a stronger position to develop and tailor interventions that function to prevent indefensible practices of this kind."

The evidence suggests that at least 200 million girls and women alive today have been subjected to genital cutting, he says.

Explore further: Health professionals lack knowledge about female genital mutilation

More information: Paper: Female genital alteration: a compromise solution, DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102375

Commentary: Not all cultural traditions deserve respect, DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103027

Commentary: In defence of genital autonomy for children, DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103030

Commentary: Cutting slack and cutting corners: an ethical and pragmatic response to Arora and Jacobs' Female genital alteration: a compromise solution,' DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103206

Editorial: Female Genital Mutilation: Multiple practices, multiple wrongs, DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103447

Authors' response: Harm reduction and female genital alteration: a response to the commentaries, DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103376

Related Stories

Health professionals lack knowledge about female genital mutilation

December 9, 2015
Health practitioners need more resources and expert guidelines to provide appropriate medical and psychological treatment for women and girls that have had female genital mutilation or cutting, says a new review of the evidence ...

Clitoridectomy and female circumcision in America

December 2, 2014
Clitoridectomy and female circumcision, practices often labeled as female genital mutilations, are not just controversial cultural rites performed in foreign countries.

Gambian president calls halt to female genital mutilation

November 25, 2015
Gambian President Yahya Jammeh has banned female genital mutilation, branding the practice as outdated and not a requirement of Islam, the information ministry announced Tuesday.

Community nurses urged to highlight dangers of female genital mutilation

March 5, 2015
In their trusted professional capacity, community nurses are well placed to develop effective collaboration with patients and families to tackle the harmful and illegal procedure of female genital mutilation, say academics.

200 million girls and women living with FGM: UNICEF

February 5, 2016
At least 200 million girls and women worldwide have been subjected to female genital mutilation with half of those living in Egypt, Ethiopia and Indonesia, according to the UN children's agency.

Two held in Britain over 'female genital mutilation'

May 4, 2012
Two people were arrested in Britain's second city of Birmingham on Friday after a media report that medics and alternative practitioners had offered to perform female genital mutilation.

Recommended for you

New shoe makes running 4 percent easier, 2-hour marathon possible, study shows

November 17, 2017
Eleven days after Boulder-born Shalane Flanagan won the New York City Marathon in new state-of-the-art racing flats known as "4%s," University of Colorado Boulder researchers have published the study that inspired the shoes' ...

Vaping while pregnant could cause craniofacial birth defects, study shows

November 16, 2017
Using e-cigarettes during pregnancy could cause birth defects of the oral cavity and face, according to a recent Virginia Commonwealth University study.

Study: For older women, every movement matters

November 16, 2017
Folding your laundry or doing the dishes might not be the most enjoyable parts of your day. But simple activities like these may help prolong your life, according to the findings of a new study in older women led by the University ...

When vegetables are closer in price to chips, people eat healthier, study finds

November 16, 2017
When healthier food, like vegetables and dairy products, is pricier compared to unhealthy items, like salty snacks and sugary sweets, Americans are significantly less likely to have a high-quality diet, a new Drexel University ...

Children's exposure to secondhand smoke may be vastly underestimated by parents

November 15, 2017
Four out of 10 children in the US are exposed to secondhand smoke, according to the American Heart Association. A new Tel Aviv University study suggests that parents who smoke mistakenly rely on their own physical senses ...

How pomegranate extract alters breast cancer stem cell properties

November 15, 2017
A University at Albany research team has found evidence suggesting that the same antioxidant that gives pomegranate fruit their vibrant red color can alter the characteristics of breast cancer stem cells, showing the superfood's ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Squirrel
not rated yet Feb 23, 2016

Expect future class actions suing the authors by women who as a result of this article suffered abuse that if they had the choice they would not have had inflicted upon them.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.