Increasing radiation dose ups freedom from biochemical fail

Increasing radiation dose ups freedom from biochemical fail

(HealthDay)—For patients with prostate cancer (PCa), increasing biologically equivalent dose (BED) of external radiation therapy (RT) is associated with freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF), but not with improvement in overall survival (OS), distant metastasis (DM), or cancer-specific mortality (CSM), according to research published online March 24 in the American Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Nicholas G. Zaorsky, M.D., from the Fox Chase Cancer Center in Boston, and colleagues conducted a meta-analysis of 12 randomized-controlled trials of external beam RT involving 6,884 PCa patients. They estimated linear relationships between BED and observed percentages of five- and 10-year outcomes. A subset analysis involving use of three-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT) versus intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) was performed for .

The researchers found that improved FFBF was seen with increasing BED, with 10-year absolute improvements of 9.6 and 7.2 percent for low- and intermediate-risk patients, respectively (P < 0.05). No improvements were seen in OS, DM, or CSM with increasing BED. There was no correlation for BED escalation with increased acute toxicities; in patients treated with 3D-CRT, BED was associated with increased late gastrointestinal toxicities. Significantly fewer late toxicities were seen for IMRT , despite treatment at higher BED.

"RT BED escalation has resulted in significantly improved PCa FFBF at up to 10 years, but not with improvement in OS, DM, or CSM," the authors write. "Thus, FFBF is a poor surrogate of overall patient outcomes for trials of RT."

Explore further

Study finds adaptive IGRT for bladder preservation clinically feasible

More information: Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Copyright © 2016 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: Increasing radiation dose ups freedom from biochemical fail (2016, April 4) retrieved 26 January 2022 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors