Friends 'better than morphine': Larger social networks release more pain-killing endorphin

Credit: Vilem Skarolek/public domain

People with more friends have higher pain tolerance, Oxford University researchers have found.

Katerina Johnson, a doctoral student in the University's Department of Experimental Psychology, was studying whether differences in our neurobiology may help explain why some of us have larger social networks than others.

She said: "I was particularly interested in a chemical in the brain called endorphin. Endorphins are part of our pain and pleasure circuitry—they're our body's natural painkillers and also give us feelings of pleasure. Previous studies have suggested that endorphins promote social bonding in both humans and other animals. One theory, known as 'the brain opioid theory of social attachment", is that social interactions trigger positive emotions when endorphin binds to opioid receptors in the brain. This gives us that feel-good factor that we get from seeing our friends.

"To test this theory, we relied on the fact that endorphin has a powerful pain-killing effect—stronger even than morphine."

The researchers therefore used as a way to assess the brain's endorphin activity. If the theory was correct, people with larger social networks would have higher pain tolerance, and this was what their study found. Friendships may really help take the pain away!

Katerina commented: "These results are also interesting because recent research suggests that the endorphin system may be disrupted in psychological disorders such as depression. This may be part of the reason why depressed people often suffer from a lack of pleasure and become socially withdrawn."

There were also two other findings of note. Both fitter people and those with higher reported stress levels tended to have smaller social networks.

Katerina explained: "It may simply be a question of time—individuals that spend more time exercising have less time to see their friends. However, there may be a more interesting explanation—since both physical and social activities promote endorphin release, perhaps some people use exercise as an alternative means to get their 'endorphin rush' rather than socialising. The finding relating to stress may indicate that larger social networks help people to manage stress better, or it may be that stress or its causes mean people have less time for social activity, shrinking their network.

"Studies suggest that the quantity and quality of our social relationships affect our physical and mental health and may even be a factor determining how long we live. Therefore, understanding why individuals have different social networks sizes and the possible neurobiological mechanisms involved is an important research topic. As a species, we've evolved to thrive in a rich social environment but in this digital era, deficiencies in our social interactions may be one of the overlooked factors contributing to the declining health of our modern society."

The study is published today in the Scientific Reports.

Explore further

The science of hugs and why they (mostly) feel so good

More information: Scientific Reports, DOI: 10.1038/srep25267
Journal information: Scientific Reports

Citation: Friends 'better than morphine': Larger social networks release more pain-killing endorphin (2016, April 28) retrieved 20 October 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Apr 28, 2016
It seems as if they presumed people have a social network as large or small as they wish. As if joining a social activity was a personal one-sided choice. Which is definitely not how it works in reality. There is a fundamental element of needing the society, somebody else who wants to do the same particular thing with you in particular, and that is obviously why some people's social circle is smaller than they would have if their own internal state was the only factor. That is also a common reason why some people don't have any social circle - it's not that they wouldn't want (although there are also people who don't want in deed), it's that they are not accepted. Well, in that case, the study makes no sense.

Apr 28, 2016
The fact is, like disease and even death, pain is a punishment from God for living wrongly. But, to allow someone to work their way out of punishment without being distracted, God allows methods of ameliorating the condition. That's why He allows things like medicine and why friends can help limit pain. But that means that all those legislating for "medical" marijuana and the ability to commit suicide if they accidentally slam a drawer on their fingers don't have things like friends to moderate pain. Those with serious diseases that don't respond to medication certainly seem to deep in malignance that they cannot summon the means of getting themselves out, no matter how much they "concentrate". In the end, though, it appears that those calling for "medical" marijuana and convenient suicide are admitting they are eminently antisocial, incapable of having normal, healthy relationships with anyone. Arrested development degenerates, freaks and failures.

Apr 28, 2016
Christ, Penrod- you prove once again that your brand of Christianity- professing love, compassion, and forgiveness is complete hypocrisy. You're the most judgmental, heartless creep there is- almost Satanic if there really was such an entity. You would be rejected as a follower by Jesus himself, because he wouldn't accept a vitriolic nincompoop spewing such hatred in his camp. Face it, you produce zero endorphins because you have zero friends!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more