Pressure recording analytical method estimates cardiac output

Pressure recording analytical method estimates cardiac output

(HealthDay)—The MostCare pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) is comparable to the Fick method of cardiac output estimation in pediatric patients, according to a study published online Aug. 27 in Pediatric Anesthesia.

José M. Alonso-Iñigo, M.D., Ph.D., from Hospital Clínico Universitario in Valencia, Spain, and colleagues conducted a single-center observational study involving 52 who underwent diagnostic right and left catheterization. Under hemodynamically stable conditions, cardiac index (CI) measurements were obtained with the MostCare-PRAM and Fick methods.

The researchers observed good agreement for CIFick and CIPRAM in the 40 CI measurements (r² = 0.90; P < 0.001), with a mean bias of −0.075 and a percentage error of 17 percent. Patients below 20 kg had similar results (r² = 0.87; P < 0.001), with a mean bias of −0.135 and percentage error of 17 percent.

"In pediatric patients undergoing diagnostic right and left heart catheterization, the MostCare-PRAM was shown to estimate CI with a good level of agreement with the Fick measurement," the authors write.

One author disclosed financial ties to Vygon.

More information: Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Copyright © 2016 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: Pressure recording analytical method estimates cardiac output (2016, September 6) retrieved 10 May 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-09-pressure-analytical-method-cardiac-output.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Pediatric nasopharyngeal CA has different patient demographic

0 shares

Feedback to editors