Economic burden of binge-eating disorder quantified

Economic burden of binge-eating disorder quantified

(HealthDay)—Individuals with binge-eating disorder (BED) have significantly greater economic burden compared to those without BED, according to a study published online Nov. 16 in the International Journal of Eating Disorders.

You-Li Ling, Ph.D., from the University of Texas at Austin, and colleagues quantified the economic burden of BED among respondents of the U.S. National Health and Wellness Survey 2013 who were invited to participate in a follow-up internet survey. A total of 1,720 individuals were included in the analysis: 344 with BED and 1,376 without BED.

The researchers found that the levels of activity impairment were higher for BED respondents than non-BED respondents (41.29 versus 23.18 percent; P < 0.001). The 178 employed BED respondents had a greater level of work impairment than the 686 employed non-BED respondents (36.83 versus 14.41 percent; P = 0.009). BED respondents had higher health care resource utilization than matched non-BED respondents, with more surgeries (0.23 versus 0.13; P = 0.021), (0.26 versus 0.15; P = 0.016), and physician visits (6.09 versus 4.56; P = 0.002). Compared with matched non-BED respondents, BED respondents reported higher total direct costs ($20,194 versus $14,465; P = 0.005). Indirect costs were higher among employed BED respondents than those without BED ($19,327 versus $9,032; P < 0.001).

"Individuals with BED reported significantly greater with respect to work productivity loss, level of health care resource utilization, and costs compared to non-BED ," the authors write.

Several authors disclosed financial ties to Shire Development, which funded the study.

Explore further

CDC: National bone mineral density data released

More information: Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Copyright © 2016 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: Economic burden of binge-eating disorder quantified (2016, November 21) retrieved 28 May 2022 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors