Media coverage of studies needs more independent commentary

December 19, 2016

Media coverage of medical studies frequently includes comments from independent experts who lack expertise in the subject or who have undisclosed academic and financial conflicts of interest, according to a study in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal).

"Despite recommendations that news stories about health research include comments from independent sources, only about 1 in 6 stories generated in response to clinical research published in major medical journals included such comments," writes Dr. Andrew Grey, Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, with coauthors. "These observations may be important because of affects the views and behaviour of the general public, and academic and clinical communities."

Media coverage of helps raise awareness of new research, and thus influences health behaviours among physicians, other , researchers and the general public. To provide context, medical journals often publish editorials or commentaries by experts in the field, and journalists are recommended to seek comments from experts other than authors of studies being reported.

However, this study by New Zealand researchers found that only 1 in 6 news stories included quotes from independent commenters and one-quarter of commenters lacked both relevant clinical and academic expertise. Among independent commenters, academic conflict of interest was present for 54% and financial conflict of interest was present for 32%—most of these conflicts of interest were not explicitly disclosed. The conflicts of interest may affect comment on research findings, with more positive views expressed about the research when academic or financial interests aligned with the results of the research.

"It is not surprising that academic conflicts of interest were frequently present for editorialists (about 40%), but it is surprising that financial conflicts of interest were equally common and that only a minority were disclosed," write the authors. "All of the journals included in the current analysis require disclosure of financial conflicts."

They suggest that strategies to improve the quality and independence of comments in health , including the disclosure of conflicts of interest, should be developed and tested.

In a related commentary, Dr. Ray Moynihan, Bond University, Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Queensland, Australia, and his coauthor write, "The call to develop and evaluate strategies to include more genuinely independent and informed commenters in coverage of medical research is welcome, as part of wider efforts to make medical journalism healthier - in media new and old."

Explore further: Are commercial conflicts of interests justifiable in medical journals?

More information: Canadian Medical Association Journal,

Canadian Medical Association Journal,

Related Stories

Recommended for you

The ethics of tracking athletes' biometric data

January 18, 2017

(Medical Xpress)—Whether it is a FitBit or a heart rate monitor, biometric technologies have become household devices. Professional sports leagues use some of the most technologically advanced biodata tracking systems to ...

Study shows blood products unaffected by drone trips

December 7, 2016

In what is believed to be the first proof-of-concept study of its kind, Johns Hopkins researchers have determined that large bags of blood products, such as those transfused into patients every day, can maintain temperature ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Dec 20, 2016
Beautiful revelation! Boom! Nice to see the "fake news" thinking, sinking into the correct cracks

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.