Study on imprecise language examines how the term "risk factor" has multiple meanings in scientific literature

January 6, 2017

It was an hours-delayed flight and a $10 food voucher that did it.

Annoyed, Anders Huitfeldt, PhD, a postdoctoral scholar at the Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford, or METRICS, decided to spend his voucher on the most impractical item he could find in the airport. After some searching, he found it: a minuscule spoon of high-end .

"It was the smallest amount you could possibly have," he said. "And it was wonderful. I kind of got addicted."

The experience got Huitfeldt thinking, but not just about fancy caviar. As a researcher at METRICS, he is interested in making scientific research findings more accurate and reproducible.

"I have had a long-standing interest in trying to understand why published research papers often fail to find the truth," he said. "It seems that often researchers are confused about what they are actually trying to do."

Huitfeldt explored that problem in the British Medical Journal's Christmas issue—a lighthearted collection of articles that address important scientific concepts. His piece, "Is caviar a risk factor for being a millionaire?" examines how the term "risk factor" can have at least four distinct meanings in scientific literature. For example, does caviar consumption predict current (is it diagnostic)? Or the likelihood of amassing wealth in the future (prognostic)? Does it actually play a role in how wealth accumulates? (For example, does eating the fish eggs make you a stock-market wizard?) Or does the act of caviar consumption simply increase the probability of wealth, perhaps by bringing the consumer into close proximity of other wealthy movers and shakers with whom profitable deals can be struck?

"The outcome of the study varies tremendously depending on what the researchers mean by 'risk factor,'" Huitfeldt said. "Until they agree, it's not even clear how the question should be addressed. And this uncertainty becomes a serious impediment to processing information correctly to arrive at the scientific truth."

Explore further: Caviar from endangered sturgeon not suitable for Christmas

More information: Anders Huitfeldt. Is caviar a risk factor for being a millionaire? BMJ (2016). DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i6536

Related Stories

Recommended for you

The ethics of tracking athletes' biometric data

January 18, 2017

(Medical Xpress)—Whether it is a FitBit or a heart rate monitor, biometric technologies have become household devices. Professional sports leagues use some of the most technologically advanced biodata tracking systems to ...

Study shows blood products unaffected by drone trips

December 7, 2016

In what is believed to be the first proof-of-concept study of its kind, Johns Hopkins researchers have determined that large bags of blood products, such as those transfused into patients every day, can maintain temperature ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.