People are found to be inefficient when searching for things

February 15, 2017 by Bob Yirka report
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

(Medical Xpress)—A trio of researchers at the University of Aberdeen in the U.K. has found that when people scan areas looking for something in particular, they tend to do so in a very inefficient manner. In their paper published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Anna Nowakowska, Alasdair Clarke and Amelia Hunt describe experiments they carried out with volunteers and what their results indicate about how people go about searching for things.

People spend a lot of time searching for things, whether it is misplaced keys, a wallet or the TV remote—it often happens because we leave objects in unfamiliar places or a cluttered environment. Few likely think about their searching strategy when trying to find something, which might be a mistake. The researchers in this new effort discovered that most people apparently waste a lot of time searching in places where the missing object is clearly not located.

To learn more about how people search for things, the researchers enlisted the assistance of 14 , each of whom was asked to look at images of lines drawn at different angles and to find the one line that was set at 45° to the right. The images were shown on a computer screen that formed a box with multiple very short equal-length lines—the lines themselves formed rows and columns, an array of sorts. Each screen was also divided in half, left and right. The left side was chaotic, with angled lines at different angles than their neighbors. The right side of the screen, on the other hand, was filled mostly with lines at the same angle, though not the 45° angle that the volunteer searched for, which made the correct one stand out—if it was there. As the volunteers searched for the line with the desired angle, their eye movements were tracked by a recording device.

After testing all of the volunteers, the researchers found that most of them spent equal amounts of time searching both sides of the screen, which logic suggests made no sense. A quick look at the right side of the screen would let the volunteer know if the line they were searching for was there, so looking at that side over and over again when the line was not there made no sense—yet most of the volunteers did it anyway.

There were exceptions, the researchers noted—one volunteer in particular did just as would be expected, glancing quickly at the right side and after noting that the target was not there, spent the rest of the time searching the left side of the screen.

Explore further: Study results suggest improving posture may help reduce depression

More information: Anna Nowakowska et al. Human visual search behaviour is far from ideal, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2017). DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2767

Evolutionary pressures have made foraging behaviours highly efficient in many species. Eye movements during search present a useful instance of foraging behaviour in humans. We tested the efficiency of eye movements during search using homogeneous and heterogeneous arrays of line segments. The search target is visible in the periphery on the homogeneous array, but requires central vision to be detected on the heterogeneous array. For a compound search array that is heterogeneous on one side and homogeneous on the other, eye movements should be directed only to the heterogeneous side. Instead, participants made many fixations on the homogeneous side. By comparing search of compound arrays to an estimate of search performance based on uniform arrays, we isolate two contributions to search inefficiency. First, participants make superfluous fixations, sacrificing speed for a perceived (but not actual) gain in response certainty. Second, participants fixate the homogeneous side even more frequently than predicted by inefficient search of uniform arrays, suggesting they also fail to direct fixations to locations that yield the most new information.

Related Stories

Study results suggest improving posture may help reduce depression

February 6, 2017
(Medical Xpress)—A team of researchers at the University of Auckland has found evidence that suggests people who are depressed can improve their outlook simply by modifying their posture while sitting. In their paper published ...

Human eye contact found to be very quick and pupil dilation an indicator of preferred mutual gaze duration

July 6, 2016
(Medical Xpress)—A team of researchers with University College London has found that the average amount of time people gaze into each other's eyes, in non-romantic settings, is remarkably short. In their paper published ...

Virtual reality 'out-of-body experience' reduces fear of death in volunteers

January 25, 2017
(Medical Xpress)—A team of researchers at Barcelona University has found that virtual reality experiences, if conducted in a certain way, can cause a reduced fear of dying. The team has written a paper describing their ...

Testing shows 3-D movies do not impact balance or coordination

July 8, 2015
(Medical Xpress)—A team of researchers with Newcastle University in the U.K. has found no evidence of balance or coordination impairments in people watching a stereoscopic (3D) movie on a television screen. In their paper ...

Neuroscientists discover way to increase product value without making changes to it

March 10, 2014
(Medical Xpress)—A team of researchers working at the University of Texas has discovered a way to cause the perceived value of a product to rise, without changing the product itself: add a button that makes noise. In their ...

A possible explanation for why people find it hard to maintain eye contact when talking

December 28, 2016
(Medical Xpress)—A pair of researchers with Kyoto University has found a possible explanation for why people sometimes have trouble maintaining eye contact when talking with someone face-to-face. In their paper published ...

Recommended for you

Heart rate study tests emotional impact of Shakespeare

July 26, 2017
In a world where on-screen violence has become commonplace, Britain's Royal Shakespeare Company is turning to science to discover whether the playwright can still make our hearts race more than 400 years on.

Talking to yourself can help you control stressful emotions

July 26, 2017
The simple act of silently talking to yourself in the third person during stressful times may help you control emotions without any additional mental effort than what you would use for first-person self-talk – the way people ...

Do all people experience similar near-death-experiences?

July 26, 2017
No one really knows what happens when we die, but many people have stories to tell about what they experienced while being close to death. People who have had a near-death-experience usually report very rich and detailed ...

Risk for bipolar disorder associated with faster aging

July 26, 2017
New King's College London research suggests that people with a family history of bipolar disorder may 'age' more rapidly than those without a history of the disease.

Visual clues we use during walking and when we use them

July 25, 2017
(Medical Xpress)—A trio of researchers with the University of Texas and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute has discovered which phase of visual information processing during human walking is used most to guide the feet accurately. ...

Toddlers begin learning rules of reading, writing at very early age, study finds

July 25, 2017
Even the proudest of parents may struggle to find some semblance of meaning behind the seemingly random mish-mash of letters that often emerge from a toddler's first scribbled and scrawled attempts at putting words on paper.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Feb 15, 2017
"A quick look at the right side of the screen would let the volunteer know if the line they were searching for was there, so looking at that side over and over again when the line was not there made no sense—yet most of the volunteers did it anyway."

There may be an issue with energy expenditure vs. memory, here. If memory isn't perfect then going back and rechecking can be a 'better' strategy than sequential searches without backtracking. It would be interesting to test whether the one 'perfect' test subject has a very good (photographic) memory.
not rated yet Feb 15, 2017
It would be interesting to test whether the one 'perfect' test subject has a very good (photographic) memory.

I suspect that person may have deduced the point of the test, so to speak. It's like the meme that asks you to count the number of times "The" is used in a long sentence broken by carriage returns. If you have any sense of narrative you realise the point is to point out how you failed to count the number of "The"s used, so you take a tiny bit of extra care and you easily get the correct answer.
In this case they may have reasoned how unlikely it was they would not see the line in the right hand side should it be different and after a cursory examination concentrated on the left hand side.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.