Poor pathologist agreement for low-grade dysplasia in Barrett's

Poor pathologist agreement for low-grade dysplasia in barrett's

(HealthDay)—There is poor agreement between pathologists in diagnosis of low-grade dysplasia (LGD) in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE), according to a study published in the February issue of Gastroenterology.

Prashanth Vennalaganti, M.D., from the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Kansas City, Mo., and colleagues discussed the for LGD and then reviewed 72 slides from patients with BE identified from seven (four from the United States and three from Europe). Slides included 23 samples of non-dysplastic BE, 22 LGD samples, and 34 high-grade dysplasia samples.

The researchers found that the overall κ value was 0.43 for diagnosis. The κ values were 0.22 for non-dysplastic BE, 0.11 for LGD, and 0.43 for high-grade dysplasia when categorized based on degree of dysplasia. The inter-observer agreement was considerable among the U.S. and European pathologists (κ, 0.63 and 0.80, respectively) when all pathologists made a diagnosis with high confidence. For all diagnoses, the κ values were higher for those made by European versus U.S. pathologists.

"In an analysis of criteria used in histopathologic of LGD, we did not observe improvement in level of agreement among experienced pathologists, even after accounting for inflammation," the authors write. "The level of inter-observer increased with level of pathologist confidence."

One author disclosed financial ties to the biopharmaceutical industry.

Explore further

Pathologists vary in suggested therapy for melanocytic lesions

More information: Full Text
Journal information: Gastroenterology

Copyright © 2017 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: Poor pathologist agreement for low-grade dysplasia in Barrett's (2017, February 6) retrieved 14 April 2021 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2017-02-poor-pathologist-agreement-low-grade-dysplasia.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments