How neurons use crowdsourcing to make decisions

June 6, 2017, Santa Fe Institute
Credit: Santa Fe Institute

How do we make decisions? Or rather, how do our neurons make decisions for us? Do individual neurons have a strong say or is the voice in the neural collective?

One way to think about this question is to ask how many of my neurons you would have to observe to read my mind. If you can predict I am about to say the word "grandma" by watching one of my neurons then we could say our decisions can be attributed to single, perhaps "very vocal," neurons. In neuroscience such neurons are called "grandmother" neurons after it was proposed in the 1960's that there may be single neurons that uniquely respond to complex and important percepts like a grandmother's face.

On the other hand, if you can only read my mind by polling many of my neurons then it would appear the decision a collective one, distributed across hundreds, thousands, or even millions of neurons. A big debate in neuroscience is whether single-neuron encoding or distributed encoding is most relevant for understanding how the brain functions.

In fact, both may be right. In research recently published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, Bryan Daniels, Jessica Flack, and David Krakauer tackle this problem using data recorded from the neurons of a tasked by the experimenter with making a simple decision.

In an area of the brain involved in the decision-making process, Daniels and colleagues find that as the monkey initially processes the data, polling many neurons is required to get a good prediction of the monkey's decision. Then, as the time for committing to a decision approaches, this pattern shifts. The neurons start to agree and eventually each one on its own is maximally predictive. Hence at first the "neural voice" is heterogeneous and collective, but as the neurons get close to the decision point, the "neural voice" becomes homogenous and, in a sense, individualistic, as any neuron on its own is sufficient to read the monkey's mind.

Daniels says a possible explanation for this odd behavior is that the system has two tasks to solve. It must gather good from noisy data and it must use this information to produce a coherent decision. To find regularities in the input it polls many , as the crowd's answer is more reliable than any single neuron's when the data are noisy. But, as Krakauer says, ultimately a has to be made. The agree on an answer by sharing their information to come to a consensus.

This explanation echoes results in other collective systems, from animal societies to systems studied in statistical physics. Flack says this commonality suggests a general principle of collective computation: It has two phases—an information accumulation phase that uses crowdsourcing to collect reliable information and a consensus phase that allows the system to act.

Explore further: Scientists demonstrate the existence of 'social neurons'

More information: Bryan C. Daniels et al. Dual Coding Theory Explains Biphasic Collective Computation in Neural Decision-Making, Frontiers in Neuroscience (2017). DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00313

Related Stories

Scientists demonstrate the existence of 'social neurons'

May 25, 2017
The existence of new "social" neurons has just been demonstrated by scientists from the Institut de neurosciences des systèmes (Aix-Marseille University / INSERM), the Laboratoire de psychologie sociale et cognitive (Université ...

Researchers uncover 'predictive neuron orchestra' behind looking and reaching movements

January 12, 2016
Different groups of neurons "predict" the body's subsequent looking and reaching movements, suggesting an orchestration among distinct parts of the brain, a team of neuroscientists has found. The study enhances our understanding ...

Snails reveal how two brain cells can hold the key to decision making

June 3, 2016
Scientists at the University of Sussex have discovered how just two neurons in the brain hold the key to explaining how complex behavioural decisions are made.

Neurons in the human eye are organized for error correction

November 17, 2016
Neurons found in the human eye naturally display a form of error correction in the collective visual signals they send to the brain, according to a new study in PLOS Computational Biology.

Recommended for you

How social isolation transforms the brain

May 17, 2018
Chronic social isolation has debilitating effects on mental health in mammals—for example, it is often associated with depression and post-traumatic stress disorder in humans. Now, a team of Caltech researchers has discovered ...

Researchers crowdsource brain mapping with gamers, discover six new neuron types

May 17, 2018
With the help of a quarter-million video game players, Princeton researchers have created and shared detailed maps of more than 1,000 neurons—and they're just getting started.

New study sheds light on brain's ability to orchestrate movement

May 17, 2018
To carry out any action, whether playing the piano or dancing the jitterbug, the brain must select and string together a series of small, discrete movements into a precise, continuous sequence.

Cannabidiol significantly reduces seizures in patients with severe form of epilepsy

May 17, 2018
Cannabidiol (CBD), a compound derived from the cannabis plant that does not produce a "high" and has been an increasing focus of medical research, was shown in a new large-scale, randomized, controlled trial to significantly ...

Learning music or speaking another language leads to more efficient brains

May 17, 2018
Whether you learn to play a musical instrument or speak another language, you're training your brain to be more efficient, suggests a Baycrest study.

Old drug provides promising new avenue for treatment of MND

May 17, 2018
An international study led by biochemists at the University of Liverpool has shown that the drug-molecule ebselen can correct many of the toxic characteristics of a protein that causes some cases of hereditary motor neurone ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

RobertKarlStonjek
not rated yet Jun 06, 2017
It has never been demonstrated that 'grandmother' cells actually contain the percept, indeed, that would be extremely unlikely. It is far more likely that grandmother cells form an index of material that is contextually relevant to one's current conditions.

We know that students can forget much of what they learn through the year and then refresh it by studying in preparation of an exam. It is highly likely that so called grandmother cells are being connected to material which will be contextually relevant in the exam environment.

We also note that after ECT patients lose their memory which starts to return after a few days. This may well correspond with a resetting of these cells which lose contextual connections and require them to reform, corresponding to what in computer technology is called a 'warm boot'.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.