How neurons use crowdsourcing to make decisions

June 6, 2017, Santa Fe Institute
Credit: Santa Fe Institute

How do we make decisions? Or rather, how do our neurons make decisions for us? Do individual neurons have a strong say or is the voice in the neural collective?

One way to think about this question is to ask how many of my neurons you would have to observe to read my mind. If you can predict I am about to say the word "grandma" by watching one of my neurons then we could say our decisions can be attributed to single, perhaps "very vocal," neurons. In neuroscience such neurons are called "grandmother" neurons after it was proposed in the 1960's that there may be single neurons that uniquely respond to complex and important percepts like a grandmother's face.

On the other hand, if you can only read my mind by polling many of my neurons then it would appear the decision a collective one, distributed across hundreds, thousands, or even millions of neurons. A big debate in neuroscience is whether single-neuron encoding or distributed encoding is most relevant for understanding how the brain functions.

In fact, both may be right. In research recently published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, Bryan Daniels, Jessica Flack, and David Krakauer tackle this problem using data recorded from the neurons of a tasked by the experimenter with making a simple decision.

In an area of the brain involved in the decision-making process, Daniels and colleagues find that as the monkey initially processes the data, polling many neurons is required to get a good prediction of the monkey's decision. Then, as the time for committing to a decision approaches, this pattern shifts. The neurons start to agree and eventually each one on its own is maximally predictive. Hence at first the "neural voice" is heterogeneous and collective, but as the neurons get close to the decision point, the "neural voice" becomes homogenous and, in a sense, individualistic, as any neuron on its own is sufficient to read the monkey's mind.

Daniels says a possible explanation for this odd behavior is that the system has two tasks to solve. It must gather good from noisy data and it must use this information to produce a coherent decision. To find regularities in the input it polls many , as the crowd's answer is more reliable than any single neuron's when the data are noisy. But, as Krakauer says, ultimately a has to be made. The agree on an answer by sharing their information to come to a consensus.

This explanation echoes results in other collective systems, from animal societies to systems studied in statistical physics. Flack says this commonality suggests a general principle of collective computation: It has two phases—an information accumulation phase that uses crowdsourcing to collect reliable information and a consensus phase that allows the system to act.

Explore further: Scientists demonstrate the existence of 'social neurons'

More information: Bryan C. Daniels et al. Dual Coding Theory Explains Biphasic Collective Computation in Neural Decision-Making, Frontiers in Neuroscience (2017). DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00313

Related Stories

Scientists demonstrate the existence of 'social neurons'

May 25, 2017
The existence of new "social" neurons has just been demonstrated by scientists from the Institut de neurosciences des systèmes (Aix-Marseille University / INSERM), the Laboratoire de psychologie sociale et cognitive (Université ...

Researchers uncover 'predictive neuron orchestra' behind looking and reaching movements

January 12, 2016
Different groups of neurons "predict" the body's subsequent looking and reaching movements, suggesting an orchestration among distinct parts of the brain, a team of neuroscientists has found. The study enhances our understanding ...

Snails reveal how two brain cells can hold the key to decision making

June 3, 2016
Scientists at the University of Sussex have discovered how just two neurons in the brain hold the key to explaining how complex behavioural decisions are made.

Neurons in the human eye are organized for error correction

November 17, 2016
Neurons found in the human eye naturally display a form of error correction in the collective visual signals they send to the brain, according to a new study in PLOS Computational Biology.

Recommended for you

The neurobiology of fruit fly courtship helps illuminates human disorders of motivation

July 13, 2018
Two fruit flies meet in an acrylic mating chamber and check each other out. It's the insect version of speed dating for science.

Fragile X: New drug strategy corrects behavior/biochemical measures in mouse model

July 13, 2018
Research in mice shows that a pharmacological strategy can alleviate multiple behavioral and cellular deficiencies in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome (FXS), the most common inherited form of intellectual disability and ...

Chemicals associated with oxidative stress may be essential to development

July 12, 2018
Some level of molecules linked to oxidative stress may be essential to health and development, according to new animal studies.

The VIPs of the nervous system—a tiny population of neurons holds a master key to the body's clock

July 12, 2018
Travel by airplane has opened the door to experiencing different cultures and exploring natural wonders. That is, if you can get past the jet lag.

Novel therapy delays muscle atrophy in Lou Gehrig's disease model

July 12, 2018
Supplementing a single protein found in the spinal cord could help prevent symptoms of Lou Gehrig's disease, according to a new study out of Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. Researchers found high levels ...

Why are neuron axons long and spindly? Study shows they're optimizing signaling efficiency

July 11, 2018
A team of bioengineers at UC San Diego has answered a question that has long puzzled neuroscientists, and may hold a key to better understanding the complexities of neurological disorders: Why are axons, the spindly arms ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

RobertKarlStonjek
not rated yet Jun 06, 2017
It has never been demonstrated that 'grandmother' cells actually contain the percept, indeed, that would be extremely unlikely. It is far more likely that grandmother cells form an index of material that is contextually relevant to one's current conditions.

We know that students can forget much of what they learn through the year and then refresh it by studying in preparation of an exam. It is highly likely that so called grandmother cells are being connected to material which will be contextually relevant in the exam environment.

We also note that after ECT patients lose their memory which starts to return after a few days. This may well correspond with a resetting of these cells which lose contextual connections and require them to reform, corresponding to what in computer technology is called a 'warm boot'.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.