Gripping someone else when scared maybe not as selfless as it seems

August 9, 2017 by Bob Yirka report
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

(Medical Xpress)—A trio of researchers, two from Switzerland and one from France, has found evidence that suggests the tendency of people to grip one another when experiencing fright might not be the selfless act that it seems. In their paper published in in the journal Royal Society Open Science, Guillaume Dezecache and Christoph Dahl with the University of Neuchâtel and Julie Grèzes with PSL Research University describe a study that involved analyzing photographs taken of people at a haunted house and what they found.

Among horror movie audiences, it is very common to see people grabbing one another when something frightening happens. In some instances, such actions might be viewed as one person reaching out to soothe or calm another—to offer a safe haven of sorts, or perhaps a move that suggests we are all in this together. Such actions, the researchers note, happen in real life, too, when people are frightened by something, such as creatures popping out at a haunted house.

To learn more about why people grab one another when frightened, the group visited a website that offers photographs of people being scared at the popular Nightmares Fear Factory—an attraction located in Niagara Falls, Canada. The group studied 460 such pictures, noting in particular the situations that involved one or more people grabbing or gripping another person in response to a fright.

The researchers report that they found that 75 percent of those confronted with a fright resorted to grabbing someone close by and holding on to them—women and children, they noted, were more likely to do so than men. But they also found something else—the percentage of people who grabbed declined as the number of people around them grew. Thus, grabbing and gripping was less likely to occur in a crowd. This, the researchers suggest, indicates that such actions are likely attributable to self-interest, or put more starkly, self-preservation. Spontaneously reaching out to grab hold of another person when frightened helps alleviate fear and perhaps might have reduced the chances of being harmed during less civilized periods. The researchers note that other more pro-social actions tended to occur after the initial shock of a fright had worn off.

Explore further: Long-term fright reactions extend beyond scary movies, TV shows

More information: Guillaume Dezecache et al. The nature and distribution of affiliative behaviour during exposure to mild threat, Royal Society Open Science (2017). DOI: 10.1098/rsos.170265

Abstract
Individual reactions to danger in humans are often characterized as antisocial and self-preservative. Yet, more than 50 years of research have shown that humans often seek social partners and behave prosocially when confronted by danger. This research has relied on post hoc verbal reports, which fall short of capturing the more spontaneous reactions to danger and determine their social nature. Real-world responses to danger are difficult to observe, due to their evanescent nature. Here, we took advantage of a series of photographs freely accessible online and provided by a haunted house attraction, which enabled us to examine the more immediate reactions to mild threat. Regarding the nature and structure of affiliative behaviour and their motivational correlates, we were able to analyse the distribution of gripping, a behaviour that could either be linked to self- or other-oriented protection. We found that gripping, an affiliative behaviour, was common, suggestive of the social nature of human immediate reactions to danger. We also found that, while gripping behaviour is quite stable across group sizes, mutual gripping dropped dramatically as group size increases. The fact that mutual gripping disappears when the number of available partners increases suggests that gripping behaviour most probably reflects a self-preservative motivation. We also found age class differences, with younger individuals showing more gripping but receiving little reciprocation. Also, the most exposed individuals received little mutual gripping. Altogether, these results suggest that primary reactions to threat in humans are driven by affiliative tendencies serving self-preservative motives.

Related Stories

Long-term fright reactions extend beyond scary movies, TV shows

October 31, 2016
Watching a scary movie or TV program can leave some people still feeling frightened years later.

Model suggests fear of crime is contagious

July 12, 2017
(Phys.org)—A pair of researchers at University College London has found evidence suggesting that fear of crime is contagious. In their paper published in Proceedings of the Royal Society A, Rafael Prieto Curiel and Steven ...

The fear you experience playing video games is real, and you enjoy it, study finds

June 29, 2015
With the advent of video games, a frequently asked question has been whether we get as engrossed in them emotionally as we do when we see a scary movie. The answer is yes and in new ways, according to new research by faculty ...

Study suggests there is more to pain than amygdalae response

March 24, 2016
(Medical Xpress)—A team of researches affiliated with several institutions in the U.S. has found evidence that suggests that the human fear response is more complicated than a simple reaction in the amygdalae. In their ...

Why some of us crave fear

November 1, 2016
Each Halloween, we are reminded that we are a nation divided.

People will subject themselves to immense fear to gain social status, says researcher

October 29, 2015
For many, Halloween is a night filled with treats, costumes, ghosts, ghouls and some fear—which can be a good thing, according to a Kansas State University expert.

Recommended for you

Study provides hope that schizophrenia isn't as deep-rooted in affected individuals as previously believed

December 8, 2017
A schizophrenia patient's own perceptions of their experiences—and confidence in their judgments—may be factors that can help them overcome challenges to get the life they wish, suggests a new paper published in Clinical ...

The evolutionary advantage of the teenage brain

December 7, 2017
The mood swings, the fiery emotions, the delusions of immortality, all the things that make a teenager a teenager might just seem like a phase we all have to put up with. However, research increasingly shows that the behaviors ...

Study reveals gap in life expectancy for people with mental illness

December 7, 2017
New research from The Australian National University (ANU) has found that men who are diagnosed with a mental health condition in their lifetime can expect to live 10.2 years less than those who aren't, and women 7.3 years.

Reading on electronic devices may interfere with science reading comprehension

December 6, 2017
People who often read on electronic devices may have a difficult time understanding scientific concepts, according to a team of researchers. They suggest that this finding, among others in the study, could also offer insights ...

Study suggests giving kids too many toys stifles their creativity

December 6, 2017
(Medical Xpress)—A team of researchers at the University of Toledo in the U.S. has found that children are more creative when they have fewer toys to play with at one time. In their paper published in the journal Infant ...

Psychosis incidence highly variable internationally

December 6, 2017
Rates of psychosis can be close to eight times higher in some regions compared to others, finds a new study led by researchers at UCL, King's College London and the University of Cambridge.

4 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Zzzzzzzz
5 / 5 (1) Aug 09, 2017
"indicates that such actions are likely attributable to self-interest, or put more starkly, self-preservation. "

Intuitively obvious.

"In some instances, such actions might be viewed as one person reaching out to soothe or calm another—to offer a safe haven of sorts"

This one has never occurred to me......
sirdumpalot
not rated yet Aug 09, 2017
When experiencing a shit-scary moment, I have never aimed to grab someone, all-the-while in fear, thinking rationally 'I am frightened, the person next to me must be frightened, let me hold them so they are less frightened'.. Maybe '.. so that we are less frightened' at best. Most often, it's just a reflex for personal safety.
Ojorf
5 / 5 (1) Aug 10, 2017
Most often, it's just a reflex for personal safety.


Absolutely, it enables you to position the other person between yourself and the danger, you can also trip and shove them towards the danger. This is a wonderful reflex for self preservation.
:-)
pntaylor
not rated yet Aug 10, 2017
Most often, it's just a reflex for personal safety.


Absolutely, it enables you to position the other person between yourself and the danger, you can also trip and shove them towards the danger. This is a wonderful reflex for self preservation.
:-)


You don't have to out run the monster, you just have to out run your companion.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.