AMA joins brief seeking VA coverage of sex reassignment Sx

AMA joins brief seeking VA coverage of sex reassignment sx

(HealthDay)—Several health care-related organizations have filed an amicus brief in support of veterans seeking a rule change that would amend or repeal the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) policy of not covering sex-reassignment surgery (SRS) for veterans with gender dysphoria, according to a report published by the American Medical Association (AMA).

The AMA has joined the brief, which notes that the VA covers all medically necessary care for transgender veterans except SRS. The brief argues that can result in clinically significant psychological distress, depression, self-mutilation, and thoughts of and attempts at suicide.

AMA policy supports for treatment of gender dysphoria as recommended by patients' physicians, noting that the financial cost of transgender individuals in the military is a rounding error in the defense budget and should not be used as an excuse to deny these Americans an opportunity to serve their country. AMA policy also affirms that transgender service members should be provided with care according to the same medical standards that apply to nontransgender personnel.

"Blanket bans on SRS—such as the VA's ban—disrupt continuity of patient care," the brief states. "This disruption of continuity of care runs contrary to the health care needs of transgender veterans, which the VA well understands."


Explore further

Transgender veterans have high rates of mental health problems

More information: More Information

Copyright © 2017 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: AMA joins brief seeking VA coverage of sex reassignment Sx (2017, September 10) retrieved 3 August 2020 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2017-09-ama-va-coverage-sex-reassignment.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
39 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments