Failure to understand risks may lead to dangerous delay in seeking medical care

December 8, 2017 by Stanley Dambroski, National Science Foundation
Red dots signify patient deaths among the total number of patients in a hypothetical experiment. The visual at top shows the death rate among patients treated with an experimental drug as 15 percent. The image at bottom gives a visual of the death rate of patients undergoing a traditional treatment as 10 percent. Research shows that visual aids improve understanding of numerical concepts for medical decision-making. Credit: NSF: Bradley Cooke

Making medical decisions for yourself or a loved one is challenging. Survival statistics, drug effectiveness rates and other numbers that convey risk factors and medical information may seem like they would ease those situations, but they can actually make them more difficult. An international team of researchers discovered that a key reason for this is "innumeracy," or the inability to understand and apply numerical concepts.

With support from the National Science Foundation (NSF), the researchers studied how people respond to episodes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), commonly known as attacks, which account for roughly 25 percent of adult deaths in the United States annually. When a heart attack strikes, immediate medical attention is crucial for preventing irreversible damage to the heart muscle. Despite knowing this, many people who experience a heart attack delay seeking medical attention, increasing their chances of serious complications, disability or death.

To understand why people delay seeking care, Edward Cokely, a University of Oklahoma researcher supported by NSF's Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Directorate, partnered with Dafina Petrova and Rocio Garcia-Retamero from the University of Granada, Spain. The researchers interviewed survivors of heart attacks several days after the event, measuring potentially relevant factors, including awareness of symptoms, severity of symptoms during the event, presence of anxiety and depression prior to the event, and demographic profile.

The team also investigated ' ability to understand numerical concepts and how that related to their to delay medical help.

Understanding numbers that indicate probability risks can be a challenge in medical decision-making. Credit: Apple's Eyes Studio/Shutterstock.com

A study produced by the researchers showed that patients with lower numeracy were four times less likely to seek within the first hour of experiencing symptoms than patients with higher numeracy. A patient's decision to delay seeking medical treatment, in turn, was reflected in the extent of damage to his or her heart muscle.

A second study delved more deeply into the numeracy issue. Cokely showed that estimating probability is one source of difficulty in making optimal , particularly when probability is expressed as a fraction. For example: Suppose 100 patients receive an experimental drug during a clinical trial and 15 of them die, while 800 patients receive a traditional treatment during the trial and 80 of them die. Which is the better option?

In this example, the traditional treatment is the better option because 15 percent of patients given the experimental drug died, while 10 percent of patients receiving the traditional treatment died. Despite this, people with lower numeracy tend to favor the , since 15 deaths are fewer than 80—but that does not account for the overall number of people in the study, the denominator in the fraction.

In other studies, Cokely found that a well-designed visual aid can eliminate "denominator neglect" and reduce the differences in the decisions made by people with high or low numeracy. "It is striking to see how effective visual aids can be for all the involved in complex, life-changing decisions, including physicians, patients and their families," Cokely said.

"Understanding how we as individuals make decisions, the factors involved and tools that could improve these decisions, is core to the work we fund," said Jon Leland, program director for the Decision, Risk and Management Sciences program at NSF. "Work that gets to the heart of why poor health decisions are made in emergency situations has the potential to save lives and reduce health care costs."

Test your numeracy at Cokely's website.

Explore further: Study clarifies risky decision making during a heart attack

More information: Dafina Petrova et al. Numeracy Predicts Risk of Pre-Hospital Decision Delay: a Retrospective Study of Acute Coronary Syndrome Survival, Annals of Behavioral Medicine (2016). DOI: 10.1007/s12160-016-9853-1

Rocio Garcia-Retamero et al. Designing Visual Aids That Promote Risk Literacy: A Systematic Review of Health Research and Evidence-Based Design Heuristics, Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (2017). DOI: 10.1177/0018720817690634

Related Stories

Study clarifies risky decision making during a heart attack

February 28, 2017
In a recent study to determine why some individuals who experience symptoms for acute coronary syndrome decide to seek medical attention more quickly than others, a University of Oklahoma researcher has identified numeracy—the ...

Blacks suffer higher rates of fatal first-time heart attacks than whites

July 10, 2017
Black men may have similar risk of coronary heart disease as white men, but their first cardiac event is twice as likely to be fatal. That means preventing a first heart attack is even more crucial for blacks, according to ...

Decision-making suffers when cancer patients avoid math

February 20, 2017
Many of the toughest decisions faced by cancer patients involve knowing how to use numbers—calculating risks, evaluating treatment options and figuring odds of medication side effects.

Decision-making can and must be learned -- new test measures risk intelligence

April 11, 2012
(Medical Xpress) -- Tests exist for evaluating personality, intelligence and memory. However, up to now, it was not easily possible to find out how good someone is at making decisions in risky situations.

Recommended for you

The good and bad health news about your exercise posts on social media

February 22, 2018
We all have that Facebook friend—or 10—who regularly posts photos of his or her fitness pursuits: on the elliptical at the gym, hiking through the wilderness, crossing a 10K finish line.

Smartphones are bad for some teens, not all

February 21, 2018
Is the next generation better or worse off because of smartphones? The answer is complex and research shows it largely depends on their lives offline.

Tackling health problems in the young is crucial for their children's future

February 21, 2018
A child's growth and development is affected by the health and lifestyles of their parents before pregnancy - even going back to adolescence - according to a new study by researchers at the Murdoch Children's Research Institute, ...

Lead and other toxic metals found in e-cigarette 'vapors': study

February 21, 2018
Significant amounts of toxic metals, including lead, leak from some e-cigarette heating coils and are present in the aerosols inhaled by users, according to a study from scientists at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public ...

Why teens need up to 10 hours' sleep

February 21, 2018
Technology, other distractions and staying up late make is difficult, but researchers say teenagers need to make time for 8-10 hours of sleep a night to optimise their performance and maintain good health and wellbeing.

Electronic health records don't reduce administrative costs

February 21, 2018
The federal government thought that adopting certified electronic health record systems (EHR) would reduce administrative costs for physicians in a variety of specialties. However, a major new study conducted by researchers ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.