A method to measure diagnostic errors could be key to preventing disability and death from misdiagnosis

January 22, 2018, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Conceptual model for Symptom-Disease Pair Analysis of Diagnostic Error (SPADE). Credit: Johns Hopkins Medicine

In an effort to reduce patient misdiagnoses and associated poor patient outcomes from lack of prompt treatment, a Johns Hopkins Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality researcher is helping to lead the way in providing hospitals a new approach to quantify and monitor diagnostic errors in their quality improvement efforts. The approach, called Symptom-Disease Pair Analysis of Diagnostic Error, or SPADE, is featured in a paper published today in BMJ Quality & Safety.

Various research studies reveal that an estimated 12 million Americans are affected each year by , with one in three errors leading to serious patient injuries, including disability or death.

"We know diagnostic errors are a big problem, but we currently have no way of operationally measuring them," says David Newman-Toker, M.D., Ph.D., director of the Armstrong Institute Center for Diagnostic Excellence. While some research was previously done by his and other groups on a smaller scale, "This is the first real description of a method that could be used broadly across a range of conditions to operationally measure diagnostic errors and associated bad outcomes so that we can track our performance and see whether our interventions are making a difference," Newman-Toker says.

Many current methods of measuring diagnostic errors rely on labor-intensive medical record reviews by staff members. The SPADE method mines large, readily available databases with hundreds of thousands of patient visits, using specific algorithms to look for common symptoms prompting a doctor visit and then pairing them with one or more diseases that could be misdiagnosed in those clinical contexts. The method uses statistical analyses to identify critical patterns that measure the rate of diagnostic error and could be incorporated into diagnostic performance dashboards. "Using SPADE, we can measure how often a patient comes to the hospital with dizziness, is mistakenly told it's a benign ear condition, is sent home, and comes back with a big stroke. We can also measure how often a patient comes to a clinic with a fever, is told it's a viral infection, but is later admitted to the hospital with bacterial sepsis," says Newman-Toker, who is also a professor of neurology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. "And being able to do that using big data is an important innovation for diagnostic quality and safety."

Newman-Toker also believes SPADE, in turn, will lead to improved . "Many quality measures focus on hospital processes, rather than patient outcomes. But it's not about treating the charts, it's about treating the . At Johns Hopkins, we focus on tracking serious adverse outcomes, such as stroke or heart attack. These measures will matter to patients," he says.

SPADE will work best with acute and subacute diseases for which a misdiagnosis that leads to hospitalization, disability or death is likely to occur within six months to a year. Further research is needed to validate SPADE across a wider range of symptoms and diseases. The method may not ultimately be applicable to all diseases, especially chronic conditions, but Newman-Toker expects it will work for what he calls "The Big Three" causes of disability and death from diagnostic error: vascular events, infections and cancers.

Thinking toward the future, Newman-Toker understands that physician and hospital leadership "buy-in" relating to tracking diagnostic errors may take time. However, he believes SPADE could eventually be among hospitals' publicly reported measures. "Patients will have the opportunity, for the first time, to see how their hospital is performing on diagnosis and ask themselves, 'Do I want to choose a hospital that has fewer misdiagnosis-related deaths?'" Newman-Toker says. "And that is a step towards patient empowerment in diagnosis that has never existed before."

Explore further: Diagnostic errors more common, costly and harmful than treatment mistakes

More information: Ava L Liberman et al. Symptom-Disease Pair Analysis of Diagnostic Error (SPADE): a conceptual framework and methodological approach for unearthing misdiagnosis-related harms using big data, BMJ Quality & Safety (2018). DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007032

Related Stories

Diagnostic errors more common, costly and harmful than treatment mistakes

April 22, 2013
In reviewing 25 years of U.S. malpractice claim payouts, Johns Hopkins researchers found that diagnostic errors—not surgical mistakes or medication overdoses—accounted for the largest fraction of claims, the most severe ...

ER doctors commonly miss more strokes among women, minorities and younger patients

April 3, 2014
Analyzing federal health care data, a team of researchers led by a Johns Hopkins specialist concluded that doctors overlook or discount the early signs of potentially disabling strokes in tens of thousands of American each ...

Alternative diagnosis for many referred for optic neuritis

December 8, 2017
(HealthDay)—Almost 60 percent of patients referred for acute optic neuritis have an alternative diagnosis, according to a study published online Dec. 7 in JAMA Ophthalmology.

Is it a stroke or benign dizziness? A simple bedside test can tell

March 5, 2013
A bedside electronic device that measures eye movements can successfully determine whether the cause of severe, continuous, disabling dizziness is a stroke or something benign, according to results of a small study led by ...

Frontline strategies to reduce misdiagnosis in hospitalized patients

October 18, 2016
While recent studies show diagnostic errors are common, researchers find diagnostic error to be a very complex topic where few practical and proven solutions exist for frontline clinicians. In an effort to advance knowledge ...

Recommended for you

Sweet, bitter, fat: New study reveals impact of genetics on how kids snack

February 22, 2018
Whether your child asks for crackers, cookies or veggies to snack on could be linked to genetics, according to new findings from the Guelph Family Health Study at the University of Guelph.

The good and bad health news about your exercise posts on social media

February 22, 2018
We all have that Facebook friend—or 10—who regularly posts photos of his or her fitness pursuits: on the elliptical at the gym, hiking through the wilderness, crossing a 10K finish line.

Smartphones are bad for some teens, not all

February 21, 2018
Is the next generation better or worse off because of smartphones? The answer is complex and research shows it largely depends on their lives offline.

Tackling health problems in the young is crucial for their children's future

February 21, 2018
A child's growth and development is affected by the health and lifestyles of their parents before pregnancy - even going back to adolescence - according to a new study by researchers at the Murdoch Children's Research Institute, ...

Lead and other toxic metals found in e-cigarette 'vapors': study

February 21, 2018
Significant amounts of toxic metals, including lead, leak from some e-cigarette heating coils and are present in the aerosols inhaled by users, according to a study from scientists at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public ...

Why teens need up to 10 hours' sleep

February 21, 2018
Technology, other distractions and staying up late make is difficult, but researchers say teenagers need to make time for 8-10 hours of sleep a night to optimise their performance and maintain good health and wellbeing.

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.