Researcher investigates why insurance companies don't ask about gun ownership

For every million scuba divers, 164 die during a dive each year. For every million gun owners or those with a gun in the home, a University of Michigan math professor estimates between 240 and 450 gun owners die from gunshot wounds each year.

While do ask whether their customers scuba dive, they don't assess the risk of firearms in the home. Researcher Kristen Moore, an actuary who studies firearm ownership, suggests that companies might benefit from studying the risk of .

What prompted you to study whether insurance companies assess the risk of owning firearms when underwriting insurance policies?

Moore: I always felt frustrated and heartbroken when I read the headlines about . I'm a mom, and my kids are 11 and 9. Sandy Hook happened the year my son was a kindergartner, and that really impacted me.

But separate from the emotion, there is an underlying actuarial question. There are about as many firearm deaths as there are auto fatalities each year in this country. If there is a death, injury or an accident, there may be an insurance claim. I started wondering, "Are insurers addressing this?" As far as I can tell, they're not.

What types of risk factors do insurance companies routinely consider?

Moore: When you apply for homeowner's insurance, they will ask whether you have a swimming pool, trampoline or an aggressive breed dog. If you apply for , the agent is going to ask whether you smoke, are overweight or whether you're a private pilot. They will ask if you scuba dive. But they won't ask if you keep a firearm in your home or how it's stored.

In our paper, we estimate the number of scuba deaths per million scuba divers versus the number of gun deaths per million firearm owners. What we found is the death rate attributable to firearms is higher than the death rate attributable to scuba diving, so I think it's perfectly reasonable to ask why they are not treated the same way in the underwriting process.

What types of insurance could be affected by gun ownership?

Moore: There are 33,000 per year in the U.S.—many of which will lead to life insurance claims. There are roughly 80,000 nonfatal gunshot injuries per year in this country, and those people can end up with catastrophic, life-altering conditions after a gunshot wound. There are many studies on the cost of treating a gunshot wound, but it is always a single snapshot: here's the cost of the first emergency room visit or here's the cost of the first inpatient hospitalization. We have not found any studies that follow gunshot victims longitudinally to look at the long-term health insurance costs related to nonfatal .

I think liability could also be significant. People don't think about this, but the Columbine mass shooting resulted in a homeowner's liability claim. The Newtown mass shooting resulted in a homeowner's liability claim. Insurance executives have estimated that the Vegas shooting will result in a billion dollars in claims across multiple lines of insurance. Of course, these are very rare occurrences—we're talking about high profile mass shootings—but I could pull up headlines about accidental shootings every day that could result in homeowner's liability claims.

There is also workers' compensation insurance, commercial liability insurance and disability insurance. All of these lines could be impacted by claims related to firearms.

How much would insurance companies change if they do start studying the impact of gun ownership?

Moore: The first thing insurers should to is quantify the risk. It could be the risk is negligible and nothing changes. But studies in medical and public health literature indicate that gun ownership is positively associated with suicide, domestic violence homicide and accidental shootings. So, it seems that a firearm increases risk. Then, the question would be, how much does it increase risk?

Suppose insurers found that yes, indeed, there's a significantly higher suicide or homicide or accidental death rate among gun owners, then life insurance premiums might go up for gun owners.

You pay a premium increase if you have a trampoline and a premium increase if you have a swimming pool, but there are measures you can take to ameliorate that risk. You can fence in your pool, for example. Perhaps the same could be done for firearm ownership. If you take a safety training class, or if you have a gun safe, then there might not be as much of a premium increase.

What do you want people to understand about insurance companies and gun ownership?

Moore: Gun violence exacts a significant toll in both human and economic cost. There's economic impact for insurers, insureds and taxpayers, but insurers aren't studying this. They're not taking this risk into account in their underwriting process. That might be a reasonable decision to make, but only after they've studied it and really quantified the risk.

In the Society of Actuaries mission statement, the SOA promise stakeholders that it will "provide trusted and objective actuarial research, analysis and insight on important societal issues." Actuaries have studied other difficult issues, such as smoker versus nonsmoker mortality, the impact of AIDS and HIV, and right now actuaries are working on quantifying the risks of obesity and climate change. If you're looking at 110,000 preventable deaths and injuries per year, that's an important societal issue, one even the American Medical Association calls a public health crisis.


Explore further

A focused intervention—the provider's role in firearm violence prevention

More information: Firearm Risk: An Insurance Perspective. theactuarymagazine.org/firearm-risk/
Citation: Researcher investigates why insurance companies don't ask about gun ownership (2018, July 3) retrieved 15 September 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-07-companies-dont-gun-ownership.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
34 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jul 03, 2018
"There are 33,000 gun deaths per year in the U.S.—many of which will lead to life insurance claims"
LIE! Two thirds of those are suicides for which most life insurance does not pay. Almost one third of those are murders, caused by someone else. And the rest, about 550 per year (out of 100,000,000 people who have a gun in their home) are accidents for which insurance would cover.

The majority of murder victims are criminals themselves, and life insurance doesn't cover one's criminal acts.

So "a few" will lead to valid life insurance claims.

Jul 03, 2018
Any deaths that affect insurance should be researched. For years I have paid a premium since I am a single male. I am a pilot. Race cars and motorcycles, race powerboats and sailboats, snow ski. And I pay a premium for them all. Shouldn't you be asked about gun ownership as well?

Jul 03, 2018
Any deaths that affect insurance should be researched...Shouldn't you be asked about gun ownership as well?


No, certainly not. The vast majority of gun owners in the US are LAW-ABIDING American citizens who love and respect their Second Amendment rights and are gun owners for self and family protection, as well as protection of property. These are the Rights handed down to us under the US Constitution, while there are those who don't believe that American citizens should have these rights and are working toward the day when they can take those rights away from us.

Life insurance firms don't ask if you are a gun owner since many of them are also gun owners. And those (politicians and others) who don't think that Americans should have the right to own guns for protection are the same ones who employ armed body guards to protect them. They are hypocrites who believe themselves to be of greater importance than ordinary Americans.

Jul 03, 2018
-CONTINUED-
Murders are committed most often by the mentally ill or in the heat of passion, which also is often done in a momentary psychotic state. But guns are only a tool, and murderers are able to use many other tools to commit their crimes, such as knives, baseball bats, and even electric drills. Would an insurance company insist on knowing whether or not you own an electric drill?
The UK has banned ownership of guns, so criminals/murderers are resorting to knives of all types. Will the UK ban the use of knives? After all, even a paring knife may be used as a lethal weapon.
The woman for whom the article is about should not be sticking her nose where it shouldn't be.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more