Researchers explore how information enters our brains

July 17, 2018, San Francisco State University
SF State University Associate Professor of Psychology Ezequiel Morsella designs an experiment on 'action sets.' Credit: San Francisco State University

Think you're totally in control of your thoughts? Maybe not as much as you think, according to a new San Francisco State University study that examines how thoughts that lead to actions enter our consciousness.

While we can "decide" to think about certain things, other information—including activities we have learned like counting—can enter our subconscious and cause us to think about something else, whether we want to or not. Psychologists call these dispositions "sets," explains SF State Associate Professor of Psychology Ezequiel Morsella, one of four authors on a new study that examines how sets influence what we end up thinking about.

Morsella and the other researchers conducted two experiments with SF State students. In the first experiment, 35 students were told beforehand to not count an array of objects presented to them. In 90 percent of the trials, students counted the objects involuntarily. In a second experiment, students were presented with differently colored geometric shapes and given the option of either naming the colors (one set) or counting the shapes (a different set). Even though students chose one over the other, around 40 percent about both sets.

"The data support the view that, when one is performing a desired action, conscious thoughts about alternative plans still occupy the mind, often insuppressibly," said Morsella.

Understanding how sets work could have implications for the way we absorb information—and whether we choose to act or not. We think of our conscious minds as private and insulated from the outside world, says Morsella. Yet our "insulation" may be more permeable than we think.

"Our is the totality of our experience, a kind of 'prime real estate' in the cognitive apparatus, influencing both decision-making and action," Morsella said.

The new study demonstrates that it's actually quite easy to activate sets in people and influence what occupies the brain's "prime ."

"The research shows that stimuli in the environment are very important in determining what we end up thinking about and that once an action plan is strongly activated its many effects can be difficult to override," said Morsella.

The study's findings support Morsella's passive frame theory, which posits that most thoughts enter our brains as a result of subliminal processes we don't totally control.

Explore further: Study finds our thoughts are susceptible to external influence even against our will

More information: Sabrina Bhangal et al, Involuntary Entry Into Consciousness From the Activation of Sets: Object Counting and Color Naming, Frontiers in Psychology (2018). DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01017

Related Stories

Study finds our thoughts are susceptible to external influence even against our will

February 3, 2015
For a recent San Francisco State University study, participants were asked to look at a commonplace image but avoid thinking of the word that corresponds with the image or how many letters are in that word. The task may seem ...

Consciousness has less control than believed, according to new theory

June 23, 2015
Consciousness—the internal dialogue that seems to govern one's thoughts and actions—is far less powerful than people believe, serving as a passive conduit rather than an active force that exerts control, according to ...

Study shows complex ideas can enter consciousness automatically

April 14, 2016
It's difficult to look at pictures of cars shown on a computer and then keep yourself from saying "car" inside your head the next time one shows up on the screen—even when someone tells you to avoid saying it. Now, a new ...

What if consciousness is not what drives the human mind?

November 22, 2017
Everyone knows what it feels like to have consciousness: it's that self-evident sense of personal awareness, which gives us a feeling of ownership and control over the thoughts, emotions and experiences that we have every ...

Recommended for you

Suicide risk in abused teen girls linked to mother-daughter conflict

October 18, 2018
Teenage girls who were maltreated as children are more likely to entertain suicidal thoughts if the relationship with their mother is poor and the degree of conflict between the two of them high.

Study shows how bias can influence people estimating the ages of other people

October 17, 2018
A trio of researchers from the University of New South Wales and Western Sydney University has discovered some of the factors involved when people make errors in estimating the ages of other people. In their paper published ...

Infants are more likely to learn when with a peer

October 16, 2018
Infants are more likely to learn from on-screen instruction when paired with another infant as opposed to viewing the lesson alone, according to a new study.

Researchers use brain cells in a dish to study genetic origins of schizophrenia

October 16, 2018
A study in Biological Psychiatry has established a new analytical method for investigating the complex genetic origins of mental illnesses using brain cells that are grown in a dish from human embryonic stem cells. Researchers ...

Income and wealth affect the mental health of Australians, study shows

October 16, 2018
Australians who have higher incomes and greater wealth are more likely to experience better mental health throughout their lives, new research led by the Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre has found.

Study suggests biological basis for depression, anxiety, sleep disturbances in older adults

October 15, 2018
UC San Francisco researchers, in collaboration with the unique Brazilian Biobank for Aging Studies (BBAS) at the University of São Paulo, have shown that the earliest stages of the brain degeneration associated with Alzheimer's ...

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

RobertKarlStonjek
not rated yet Jul 17, 2018
Part 1: One of the problems of this another such studies (eg Libet) is that only the last conscious process is considered. Consciousness is part of a whole brain activity most of which is not directly conscious. Likewise, most of what the computer does is also not conscious or visible. If, for instance, we initiate a computer search and then scan the results it is obvious that this entire process is conscious, but if we start with the computer's search routine (not conscious) we note that the behaviour of the conscious process (the user) is directed by non-conscious (the computer search routine) processes.

Likewise with the brain. As this is a much slower processor we may not be aware of the earlier conscious input that resulted, after non-conscious processing, in the eventual conscious decision. We consciously initiate processes that must pass into non-conscious areas for processing and storage....
RobertKarlStonjek
not rated yet Jul 17, 2018
Part 2: ...When the results emerge from subconscious processing it appears as if the conscious decision is guided by non-conscious processes.

To add to the confusion there are non-conscious processes that guide behaviour in addition to the conscious ones. For instance we do not consciously solicit feelings of pain or pleasure or any of the other feelings and emotions that underpin conscious experience though some portion of these are influenced consciously.

Any conclusion that all conscious decisions are conscious or that all conscious decisions are non-conscious can confidently be dismissed as naively ignorant of the actual complexity of conscious thought processes. But one must also be very cautious of attributing to subconscious processes alone decisions subsequently made consciously just because the conscious initiation of those subconscious processes is not immediately in evidence.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.