Researchers explore how information enters our brains

July 17, 2018, San Francisco State University
SF State University Associate Professor of Psychology Ezequiel Morsella designs an experiment on 'action sets.' Credit: San Francisco State University

Think you're totally in control of your thoughts? Maybe not as much as you think, according to a new San Francisco State University study that examines how thoughts that lead to actions enter our consciousness.

While we can "decide" to think about certain things, other information—including activities we have learned like counting—can enter our subconscious and cause us to think about something else, whether we want to or not. Psychologists call these dispositions "sets," explains SF State Associate Professor of Psychology Ezequiel Morsella, one of four authors on a new study that examines how sets influence what we end up thinking about.

Morsella and the other researchers conducted two experiments with SF State students. In the first experiment, 35 students were told beforehand to not count an array of objects presented to them. In 90 percent of the trials, students counted the objects involuntarily. In a second experiment, students were presented with differently colored geometric shapes and given the option of either naming the colors (one set) or counting the shapes (a different set). Even though students chose one over the other, around 40 percent about both sets.

"The data support the view that, when one is performing a desired action, conscious thoughts about alternative plans still occupy the mind, often insuppressibly," said Morsella.

Understanding how sets work could have implications for the way we absorb information—and whether we choose to act or not. We think of our conscious minds as private and insulated from the outside world, says Morsella. Yet our "insulation" may be more permeable than we think.

"Our is the totality of our experience, a kind of 'prime real estate' in the cognitive apparatus, influencing both decision-making and action," Morsella said.

The new study demonstrates that it's actually quite easy to activate sets in people and influence what occupies the brain's "prime ."

"The research shows that stimuli in the environment are very important in determining what we end up thinking about and that once an action plan is strongly activated its many effects can be difficult to override," said Morsella.

The study's findings support Morsella's passive frame theory, which posits that most thoughts enter our brains as a result of subliminal processes we don't totally control.

Explore further: Study finds our thoughts are susceptible to external influence even against our will

More information: Sabrina Bhangal et al, Involuntary Entry Into Consciousness From the Activation of Sets: Object Counting and Color Naming, Frontiers in Psychology (2018). DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01017

Related Stories

Study finds our thoughts are susceptible to external influence even against our will

February 3, 2015
For a recent San Francisco State University study, participants were asked to look at a commonplace image but avoid thinking of the word that corresponds with the image or how many letters are in that word. The task may seem ...

Consciousness has less control than believed, according to new theory

June 23, 2015
Consciousness—the internal dialogue that seems to govern one's thoughts and actions—is far less powerful than people believe, serving as a passive conduit rather than an active force that exerts control, according to ...

Study shows complex ideas can enter consciousness automatically

April 14, 2016
It's difficult to look at pictures of cars shown on a computer and then keep yourself from saying "car" inside your head the next time one shows up on the screen—even when someone tells you to avoid saying it. Now, a new ...

What if consciousness is not what drives the human mind?

November 22, 2017
Everyone knows what it feels like to have consciousness: it's that self-evident sense of personal awareness, which gives us a feeling of ownership and control over the thoughts, emotions and experiences that we have every ...

Recommended for you

Researchers discover abundant source for neuronal cells

December 13, 2018
USC researchers seeking a way to study genetic activity associated with psychiatric disorders have discovered an abundant source of human cells—the nose.

New genetic clues to early-onset form of dementia

December 13, 2018
Unlike the more common Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia tends to afflict young people. It accounts for an estimated 20 percent of all cases of early-onset dementia. Patients with the illness typically begin to ...

Video game players frequently exposed to graphic content may see world differently

December 13, 2018
People who frequently play violent video games are more immune to disturbing images than non-players, a UNSW-led study into the phenomenon of emotion-induced blindness has shown.

How teens deal with stress may affect their blood pressure, immune system

December 13, 2018
Most teens get stressed out by their families from time to time, but whether they bottle those emotions up or put a positive spin on things may affect certain processes in the body, including blood pressure and how immune ...

Length of eye blinks might act as conversational cue

December 12, 2018
Blinking may feel like an unconscious activity, but new research by Paul Hömke and colleagues at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, suggests that humans unknowingly perceive eye blinks as nonverbal cues when ...

How bullying affects the brain

December 12, 2018
New research from King's College London identifies a possible mechanism that shows how bullying may influence the structure of the adolescent brain, suggesting the effects of constantly being bullied are more than just psychological.

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

RobertKarlStonjek
not rated yet Jul 17, 2018
Part 1: One of the problems of this another such studies (eg Libet) is that only the last conscious process is considered. Consciousness is part of a whole brain activity most of which is not directly conscious. Likewise, most of what the computer does is also not conscious or visible. If, for instance, we initiate a computer search and then scan the results it is obvious that this entire process is conscious, but if we start with the computer's search routine (not conscious) we note that the behaviour of the conscious process (the user) is directed by non-conscious (the computer search routine) processes.

Likewise with the brain. As this is a much slower processor we may not be aware of the earlier conscious input that resulted, after non-conscious processing, in the eventual conscious decision. We consciously initiate processes that must pass into non-conscious areas for processing and storage....
RobertKarlStonjek
not rated yet Jul 17, 2018
Part 2: ...When the results emerge from subconscious processing it appears as if the conscious decision is guided by non-conscious processes.

To add to the confusion there are non-conscious processes that guide behaviour in addition to the conscious ones. For instance we do not consciously solicit feelings of pain or pleasure or any of the other feelings and emotions that underpin conscious experience though some portion of these are influenced consciously.

Any conclusion that all conscious decisions are conscious or that all conscious decisions are non-conscious can confidently be dismissed as naively ignorant of the actual complexity of conscious thought processes. But one must also be very cautious of attributing to subconscious processes alone decisions subsequently made consciously just because the conscious initiation of those subconscious processes is not immediately in evidence.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.