The toxic air we breathe

September 21, 2018 by Taylor Mcneil, Tufts University
“What if I told you that you are exposed every day to one of the most toxic substances we know, and this this substance is, in fact, the leading environmental cause of death and illness?” Doug Brugge writes in his new book. Credit: Depositphotos

When we think of health hazards, many things come to mind: bad nutrition, car accidents, addiction to drugs. But one we rarely consider is our exposure to particulate matter in the air we breathe. After all, aside from the occasional forest fire, we in the U.S. are pretty immune to that, right?

Doug Brugge tells us otherwise in his new book Particles in the Air: The Deadliest Pollutant Is the One You Breathe Every Day (Springer). In fact, he points out that three of the ten top causes of ill health and death worldwide are due to . While smoking is an obvious one, indoor solid fuel burning in developing countries and exposure to fine and , which go deep into our lungs and even get into our brains, are less visible but likewise harmful.

The most hazardous particulate matter, or PM, is the result of combustion, from burning wood, coal, gasoline, and other fossil fuels. Those particles are small: they make the dust motes we see in a ray of sunshine seem like boulders by comparison, says Brugge, a professor in the Tufts School of Medicine's Department of Public Health and Community Medicine and a Tisch Senior Fellow. They are present even when we look out and see clear blue skies. And for many millions of people around the world, such as in China and India, they are even more common, from traffic, , and cooking fires.

Brugge's short book, written with the goal of educating a general audience, details the hazards of PM and the people who are harmed by them, from women who use indoor cooking stoves in India and China to people affected by secondhand smoke. He highlights some positives—such as how the petroleum industry helped promote the use of liquid petroleum gas instead of far more polluting fuels in India. More often than not, though, companies sought to delay recognition of the harm of cigarettes, secondhand smoke, and ambient air pollutants by trying to cast doubt on scientific research.

In his own research, Brugge, who is also co-chair of the Tisch College Community Research Center, has shown the harmful effects of ultrafine particles on people living near highways, and is continuing research on health effects of highway pollution.

We recently talked with Brugge about particulate matter, the air we breathe, and what can be done about air pollution.

Tufts Now: How does particulate matter affect human health?

Doug Brugge: There are respiratory effects, such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and lung cancer, but the cardiovascular effects—primarily heart attacks and strokes—are a much bigger impact. There is a still a lot of research being done on how pollution is driving these effects, but the evidence suggests that particulate matter causes increased inflammation, which drives a variety of these outcomes, from respiratory to cardiovascular.

There is emerging evidence that particulate matter also affects neurological functions such as autism and Alzheimer's disease, especially in children and older people. These neurotoxic effects of particulate matter are becoming more and more recognized, and appear to be quite important.

In countries like the U.S., people look outside and see blue skies. But there's still cause for concern here, right?

I was thinking about this recently, with the fires in the western part of the country. Everyone there can smell those fires, and they become very aware that there's air pollution and that it could be affecting their health. Here on the East Coast, generally you can't see or smell air pollution. But near the highway or roadway, and even in areas near big cities or industrial sources, there is strong evidence that those invisible odorless levels of pollution cause significant illness and death. The trouble is, it's an out-of-sight, out-of-mind issue.

And, of course, problems are significantly worse in many other countries, such as China, India, and Iran.

You've shown that people living in buildings alongside highways are at risk from particulate matter—what about drivers? Millions of people drive on highways every day.

I think driving is a quite substantial exposure. For most people, it's a small part of their day, but the exposures are higher. I haven't studied it so much, but I've seen research that a quarter or a third of people's exposure can be during their commute. We did monitoring of pollution in the Big Dig tunnel in Boston, and it was very high. Closing the air vent in the car rather than pulling air in from outside will help. I don't always remember, but I try to switch over to a mode like that when I'm on the highway.

You also devote a lot of the book to industry efforts that try to discredit the science about tobacco, secondhand smoke, and fine particulate matter from energy sources—all in the name of protecting profits.

I think the starting point was the tobacco industry responding to the evidence about the harmful effects of smoking. It established a model and approach that was fairly sophisticated and moderately effective in pushing back the timeframe when public health and regulatory efforts could convince people that smoking was a bad idea.

While industry may have delayed regulation and public awareness, it was not ultimately successful. In developed countries, smoking rates are way down, and is less prevalent as smoking is usually pushed outside of buildings in countries like the U.S. And fine PM are now regulated; even in counties like China, where fine PM is still very high, they are trying to reduce the levels.

How can we as educated consumers balance or combat that anti-science narrative?

As a society we need to be respectful of scientific evidence. There is a tendency in the media—and among the public and policymakers—to not understand how science works. Research leads to an accumulation of evidence, and it's not perfect; there's always some uncertainty. But at any point in time you have to make some decisions with what evidence you have and implement the best policy and practice that is consistent with what you know at that time. I try to keep an open mind, though, that the evidence can change.

The EPA under the Trump administration is relaxing coal emission standards—what will be the impact?

The Trump administration has been trying to set back standards to what they were before the Obama administration. It has only been partly successful in doing so and I doubt we are headed back to the days before modern regulations. Even if they set back the standards, I think some of that reversal will be ineffective, because the market is moving toward safer and cleaner energy sources; consumers prefer them, and on a very basic level, they are becoming more economical.

Explore further: Study finds air purifiers may benefit fetal growth

Related Stories

Study finds air purifiers may benefit fetal growth

September 12, 2018
A new study led by SFU health sciences researchers Prabjit Barn and Ryan Allen reveals fetal growth may improve if pregnant women use portable air purifiers inside their homes.

Air pollution leads to cardiovascular diseases

August 23, 2018
Air pollution, and fine dust in particular, is responsible for more than four million deaths each year. Almost 60 per cent of deaths occur as a result of cardiovascular diseases. Scientists around Professor Thomas Münzel, ...

Blacks have more exposure to air pollutants raising heart disease risk, death

March 15, 2018
Blacks often have higher exposure to air pollution than whites, which may partially explain their higher risk heart disease and death compared to whites, according to new research in Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular ...

Air pollution – a neglected cause of death 

July 2, 2018
In 2015, around 4.5 million people died prematurely from diseases attributed to ambient air pollution, including 237,000 children under the age of five from respiratory infections. This is the result of a study published ...

Air pollution linked to cardiovascular disease; air purifiers may lessen impact

August 14, 2017
Exposure to high levels of air pollution increased stress hormone levels and negative metabolic changes in otherwise healthy, young adults in a recent study conducted in China. Air purifiers appeared to lessen the negative ...

Coarse particulate matter may increase asthma risk

December 15, 2017
Children exposed to coarse particulate matter may be more likely to develop asthma and to be treated in an ER or be hospitalized for the condition, according to new research published online in the American Thoracic Society's ...

Recommended for you

Babies and toddlers at greater risk from second-hand smoke than previously thought, study finds

December 16, 2018
Infants and toddlers in low-income communities may be even more at risk from second- and third-hand smoke exposure than has been believed, according to new federally supported research.

A co-worker's rudeness can affect your sleep—and your partner's, study finds

December 14, 2018
Rudeness. Sarcastic comments. Demeaning language. Interrupting or talking over someone in a meeting. Workplace incivilities such as these are becoming increasingly common, and a new study from Portland State University and ...

A holiday gift to primary care doctors: Proof of their time crunch

December 14, 2018
The average primary care doctor needs to work six more hours a day than they already do, in order to make sure their patients get all the preventive and early-detection care they want and deserve, a new study finds.

Teens get more sleep with later school start time, researchers find

December 12, 2018
When Seattle Public Schools announced that it would reorganize school start times across the district for the fall of 2016, the massive undertaking took more than a year to deploy. Elementary schools started earlier, while ...

Large restaurant portions a global problem, study finds

December 12, 2018
A new multi-country study finds that large, high-calorie portion sizes in fast food and full service restaurants is not a problem unique to the United States. An international team of researchers found that 94 percent of ...

Receiving genetic information can change risk

December 11, 2018
Millions of people in the United States alone have submitted their DNA for analysis and received information that not only predicts their risk for disease but, it turns out, in some cases might also have influenced that risk, ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.