Clues that suggest people are lying may be deceptive, study shows

October 12, 2018, University of Edinburgh
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

The verbal and physical signs of lying are harder to detect than people believe, a study suggests.

Tests reveal that people are skilled at identifying commonly displayed cues—such as hesitations and hand gestures—but these signs are produced more often when someone is telling the truth.

Liars are also skilled at supressing these signals to avoid detection, researchers found.

Psychologists used an interactive game to assess the types of speech and gestures speakers produce when lying, and which clues listeners interpret as evidence that a statement is false.

Researcher Jia Loy, from the University of Edinburgh, created a computerised two-player game in which 24 pairs of players hunted for treasure. Players were free to lie at will.

Researchers coded more than 1100 utterances produced by speakers against 19 potential cues to lying—such as pauses in speech, changes in rate, shifts in and eyebrow movements.

The cues were analysed to see which ones listeners identified, and which cues were more likely to be produced when telling an untruth.

The team found listeners were efficient at identifying these common signs.

Listeners make judgements on whether something is true within a few hundred milliseconds of encountering a cue.

However, they found that the common cues associated with lying were more likely to be used if the is telling the truth.

Researchers say the study helps understand the psychological dynamics that shape deception.

Lead researcher Dr. Martin Corley, of the University of Edinburgh's School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, said: "The findings suggests that we have strong preconceptions about the behaviour associated with lying, which we act on almost instinctively when listening to others. However, we don't necessarily produce these cues when we're lying, perhaps because we try to suppress them."

Explore further: Video game trains people to better discern truth from lies—and how to spot deceptive behavior

More information: Jia E. Loy et al, Cues to Lying May be Deceptive: Speaker and Listener Behaviour in an Interactive Game of Deception, Journal of Cognition (2018). DOI: 10.5334/joc.46

Related Stories

Video game trains people to better discern truth from lies—and how to spot deceptive behavior

July 10, 2018
All liars have classic tells: the lack of eye contact, the fidgeting, the overly elaborate stories. Except when they don't.

Liars find it more rewarding to tell truth than fib when deceiving others

January 23, 2014
A University of Toronto report based on two neural imaging studies that monitored brain activity has found individuals are more satisfied to get a reward from telling the truth rather than getting the same reward through ...

Lying in a foreign language is easier

July 20, 2018
It is not easy to tell when someone is lying. This is even more difficult when potential liars speak in a language other than their native tongue. Psychologists of the University of Würzburg investigated why that is so.

Eye movement direction not correlated with lying, study claims

July 11, 2012
New research refutes a commonly held belief that certain eye movements are associated with lying.

Study suggests we can recognize speakers only from how faces move when talking

April 18, 2018
Results of a new study by cognitive psychologist and speech scientist Alexandra Jesse and her linguistics undergraduate student Michael Bartoli at the University of Massachusetts Amherst should help to settle a long-standing ...

Recommended for you

What social stress in monkeys can tell us about human health

December 11, 2018
Research in recent years has linked a person's physical or social environment to their well-being. Stress wears down the body and compromises the immune system, leaving a person more vulnerable to illnesses and other conditions. ...

The richer the reward, the faster you'll likely move to reach it, study shows

December 11, 2018
If you are wondering how long you personally are willing to stand in line to buy that hot new holiday gift, scientists at Johns Hopkins Medicine say the answer may be found in the biological rules governing how animals typically ...

Receiving genetic information can change risk

December 11, 2018
Millions of people in the United States alone have submitted their DNA for analysis and received information that not only predicts their risk for disease but, it turns out, in some cases might also have influenced that risk, ...

Using neurofeedback to prevent PTSD in soldiers

December 11, 2018
A team of researchers from Israel, the U.S. and the U.K. has found that using neurofeedback could prevent soldiers from experiencing PTSD after engaging in emotionally difficult situations. In their paper published in the ...

You make decisions quicker and based on less information than you think

December 11, 2018
We live in an age of information. In theory, we can learn everything about anyone or anything at the touch of a button. All this information should allow us to make super-informed, data-driven decisions all the time.

These bacteria may be the key to treating clinical depression

December 11, 2018
We like to think of ourselves as individuals.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Oct 12, 2018
The weakness of this approach is that whilst certain cues may be identified when a particular individual is lying relative to their truth telling, it does not hold when comparing individuals as one person may show signs of lying when telling the truth.

Having suffered social anxiety in the past I am aware of how a person can appear to be lying and even feel like lies are being told when telling the truth during a particularly anxious episode, the anxiety being very similar to that experience by an individual when attempting deception and realising that this is failing and their deception is exposed (exposure being the locus of social anxiety).

Thus to be consistent a baseline must always be established for a particular individual before relative truth and deception cues can be consistently interpreted. I understand hat something similar is required for polygraph tests.
not rated yet Oct 13, 2018
I'd have to dive into the paper to know what they mean by language cues. I find much about evasive language which is quite easy to identify if you're a logical enough person.

Sophie and Silas - http://wwwscienti...las.html

http://wwwscienti...age.html - this link has all my findings linked inthe replies section
not rated yet Oct 13, 2018
1 / 5 (1) Oct 13, 2018
Gee I thought only 'doctor' christine ford had the truth

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.