Recent survey provides updated national estimate of doctors' financial ties to industry

Recent survey provides updated national estimate of doctors' financial ties to industry
Lisa Schwartz, MD, MS, and Steven Woloshin, MD, MS, co-directors of the Center for Medicine and the Media at The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, were part of a research team that conducted a national survey of 1,500 physicians on gifts and payments from pharmaceutical and medical device companies. Credit: The Dartmouth Institute

Since 2013, gifts and payments to doctors by pharmaceutical and medical device companies have been publicly reported. In addition, some medical centers, physician employers, such as Kaiser Permanente, and states have banned or restricted detailing visits, physician payments or gifts. Some manufacturers have also changed their practices for certain gifts. In order to better understand the effects of these changes, a team of researchers from Harvard Medical School, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice and the American Board of Internal Medicine in Philadelphia conducted a national survey of internal medicine doctors.

The researchers randomly sampled 1,500 internists and internal medicine specialists, asking 10 yes-or-no questions about "drug, device, or other methodically related company" interactions in the last year: food inside or outside the workplace; free drug samples; pens, notepads, T-shirts; honoraria for speaking; payment for consulting services; for service on an ; costs of personal expenses for attending meetings; free tickets to events; subsidized admission to meetings; or conferences for which Continuing Medical Education Credits (CME) were awarded.

About three-quarters (72%) of respondents reported any financial tie to industry. The most common benefits received were samples (55%) and food and beverage in (48%) or outside (30%) the workplace. Few doctors reported receiving small gifts (8%) or consulting (4%) or service on a specific advisory board (3%). In 2017 (the year surveyed), specialists reported more meals than internists both inside and outside work, as did male MDs than female MDs. The researchers note that these differences were similar to those found in a national physician survey in 2009 with similar questions and response rates. Compared to 2009, fewer doctors reported receiving all types of financial payments, with the greatest reductions related to food/beverage or tickets to sporting or cultural events (75% vs 42%) and speakers bureaus/consulting/advisory boards (18% vs 2%). Among cardiologists, the only significant differences were for (82% vs 60%) and speakers bureaus/consulting advisory boards (33% vs 8%).

"What the survey revealed is that while financial industry ties have fallen some over the past decade, a majority of doctors still reported them," says Dartmouth Institute Professor Lisa Schwartz, MD, MS, a member of the research team. "This is particularly concerning when you consider that free samples, which are among the most common financial tie reported, have been linked to the prescribing of high-cost brand-name drugs over lower-cost generic alternatives."

More information: Aaron S. Kesselheim et al, Internal Medicine Physicians' Financial Relationships with Industry: An Updated National Estimate, Journal of General Internal Medicine (2018). DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4688-z

Provided by The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice
Citation: Recent survey provides updated national estimate of doctors' financial ties to industry (2018, October 19) retrieved 7 June 2023 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

What's the real extent of industry payments to doctors?


Feedback to editors