Dietary fat is good? Dietary fat is bad? Coming to consensus

diet
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Which is better, a low-fat/high-carbohydrate diet or a high-fat/low-carbohydrate diet—or is it the type of fat that matters? In a new paper featured on the cover of Science magazine's special issue on nutrition, researchers from Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston Children's Hospital, and colleagues with diverse expertise and perspectives on the issues laid out the case for each position and came to a consensus and a future research agenda.

The researchers agreed that no specific fat to ratio is best for everyone, and that an overall high-quality that is low in sugar and refined grains will help most people maintain a healthy weight and low chronic disease risk.

"This is a model for how we can transcend the diet wars," said lead author David Ludwig, professor in the Department of Nutrition at Harvard Chan School and a physician at Boston Children's Hospital. "Our goal was to assemble a team with different areas of expertise and contrasting views, and to identify areas of agreement without glossing over differences."

The review was published online November 15, 2018 in Science.

The authors laid out the evidence for three contrasting positions on dietary guidelines for fat and carbohydrate consumption:

  1. High consumption of fat causes obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and possibly cancer, therefore low-fat diets are optimal.
  2. Processed carbohydrates have negative effects on metabolism; lower-carbohydrate or ketogenic (very low-carbohydrate) diets with are better for health.
  3. The relative quantity of dietary fat and carbohydrate has little health significance—what's important is the type of fat or carbohydrate source consumed.

They agreed that by focusing on diet quality—replacing saturated or trans fats with unsaturated fats and replacing refined carbohydrates with whole grains and nonstarchy vegetables—most people can maintain good health within a broad range of fat-to-carbohydrate ratios.

Within their areas of disagreement, the authors identified a list of questions that they said can form the basis of a new nutrition research agenda, including:

  1. Do diets with various carbohydrate-to-fat ratios affect body composition (ratio of fat to lean tissue) regardless of caloric intake?
  2. Do ketogenic diets provide metabolic benefits beyond those of moderate carbohydrate restriction, and especially for diabetes?
  3. What are the optimal amounts of specific types of fat (including saturated fat) in a very-low-carbohydrate diet?

Finding the answers to these questions, the researchers said, will ultimately lead to more effective nutrition recommendations.


Explore further

Low-carbohydrate diets are unsafe and should be avoided

More information: "Dietary fat: From foe to friend?" Science (2018). science.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi … 1126/science.aau2096
Provided by Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Citation: Dietary fat is good? Dietary fat is bad? Coming to consensus (2018, November 15) retrieved 22 March 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-11-dietary-fat-good-bad-consensus.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
55 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more