Fear that uproar over gene-edited babies could block science

November 30, 2018 by Lauran Neergaard
Fear that uproar over gene-edited babies could block science
In this Nov. 28, 2018, photo, He Jiankui, a Chinese researcher, speaks during the Human Genome Editing Conference in Hong Kong. He made his first public comments about his claim to have helped make the world's first gene-edited babies. The uproar over the unproven report of gene-edited births in China has researchers elsewhere worried about a backlash. (AP Photo/Kin Cheung)

Scientists working on the frontiers of medicine fear the uproar over the reported births of gene-edited babies in China could jeopardize promising research into how to alter heredity to fend off a variety of disorders.

Researchers are rapidly learning how to edit DNA to fight such conditions as Huntington's, Tay-Sachs and hereditary heart disease, conducting legally permissible experiments in lab animals and petri dishes without taking the ultimate step of actually creating babies. Now they worry about a backlash against their work, too.

"The alarmists who claimed that scientists won't behave responsibly in the development of the next generation of gene editing now have ammunition," said a dismayed Kyle Orwig, a reproductive specialist at the University of Pittsburgh who hopes to eventually alter to treat infertility.

He said there is a clear public demand for the kind of research he is doing: "Families contact me all the time," men who can't produce sperm and aren't helped by today's reproductive care.

A Chinese researcher sent a shock wave through the this week when he claimed to have altered the DNA of embryos in hopes of making them resistant to the AIDS virus. He reported the birth of twin girls and said there may be another pregnancy resulting from his work.

Fear that uproar over gene-edited babies could block science
In this Oct. 9, 2018, photo, Qin Jinzhou, an embryologist who was part of the team working with scientist He Jiankui, adjusts a microplate containing embryos that have been injected with Cas9 protein and PCSK9 sgRNA at a lab in Shenzhen in southern China's Guandong province. China's government on Thursday, Nov. 29, 2018, ordered a halt to work by a medical team that claimed to have helped make the world's first gene-edited babies. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

International guidelines for years have said gene editing that can change human heredity—through altered eggs, sperm or embryos—should not be tested in human pregnancies until scientists learn if the practice is safe. One fear is that such experiments could inadvertently damage that could then be passed on to future generations.

China has ordered a halt to the seemingly underground experiments by researcher He Jiankui and his team.

"This is what we're afraid of: Not legitimate scientists—it's crazy people that would just try it without even worrying about consequences," said Shoukhrat Mitalipov of the Oregon Health & Science University, who is conducting laboratory-only experiments on how to repair gene defects in human embryos.

If the outcry results in more restrictions being added to the current patchwork of rules on what can be studied and how, the field "will be, probably, thrown back for decades," he added.

Fear that uproar over gene-edited babies could block science
In this Oct. 9, 2018, photo, Zhou Xiaoqin installs a fine glass pipette into a sperm injection microscope in preparation for injecting embryos with Cas9 protein and PCSK9 sgRNA at a lab in Shenzhen in southern China's Guandong province. China's government on Thursday, Nov. 29, 2018, ordered a halt to work by a medical team that claimed to have helped make the world's first gene-edited babies. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

The challenge, said Pittsburgh's Orwig, is to "convince the community that this is one bad apple but it doesn't reflect what most people are doing."

There are multiple kinds of gene editing. Experiments to try to fix damaged genes in children and adults with diseases such as sickle cell are fairly straightforward because that drug-like approach would affect only the patient and not his or her offspring.

Far more contentious is gene editing of the "germline," or changing genes in such a way that they will be passed through generations. The big ethical question is whether such tinkering should be restricted to genes that can cause otherwise untreatable disorders, or whether medicine should be free to create "designer babies" with specific traits, such as high IQ.

"I do think the public is probably open to pretty clearly therapeutic uses of this kind of thing, to prevent transmission of disease. But there's significant discomfort, if not complete opposition, to enhancement uses," said Josephine Johnston, an expert on biomedical ethics and policy at the Hastings Center, a bioethics research institute based in Garrison, New York.

Fear that uproar over gene-edited babies could block science
He Jiankui, a Chinese researcher, speaks during the Human Genome Editing Conference in Hong Kong, Wednesday, Nov. 28, 2018. He made his first public comments about his claim to have helped make the world's first gene-edited babies. (AP Photo/Kin Cheung)

In a poll last summer, the Pew Research Center found most Americans—about 7 in 10—said changing an unborn baby's DNA to treat a serious disease the child would otherwise be born with would be appropriate. But support dropped sharply when people were told that that would involve studies with embryos.

And just 19 percent thought gene editing for such things as enhancing intelligence would be appropriate, Pew found.

How to prove that gene editing is safe enough to legitimately try in human pregnancies is a conundrum, said University of Pennsylvania bioethicist Jonathan Moreno. "No regulator follows that child over a lifetime, much less their progeny," he noted.

Another question for ethicists: Even if it were deemed safe, is of embryos really needed given today's options? Already, families who can afford pricey in vitro fertilization can pay extra to have the embryos genetically tested—and implant only those free of well-known dangerous mutations.

Fear that uproar over gene-edited babies could block science
In this Oct. 9, 2018, file photo, a microplate containing embryos that have been injected with Cas9 protein and PCSK9 sgRNA is seen in a laboratory in Shenzhen in southern China's Guangdong province. The uproar over the unproven report of gene-edited births in China has researchers elsewhere worried about a backlash. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein, File)

But such preimplantation diagnosis isn't an answer for everyone, Johnston cautioned. IVF doesn't always produce enough embryos for couples to choose among. And as testing uncovers more and more disorders, people will have to understand "there's not going to be a perfect embryo," she said.

In Pittsburgh, Orwig sees sperm as offering possibly a more practical first step toward germline editing. Some male infertility is caused by genetic defects that prevent testicular stem cells from properly producing sperm. His team studies infertile men to find culprit genes.

Among his plans: gene-edit stem cells, and implant the repaired ones in infertile mice to see if they produce sperm that lead to healthy baby mice.

The technique could be adjusted so that the genetic change isn't necessarily passed on to the next generation, he said.

Fear that uproar over gene-edited babies could block science
He Jiankui, a Chinese researcher, center, speaks during the Human Genome Editing Conference in Hong Kong, Wednesday, Nov. 28, 2018. He made his first public comments about his claim to have helped make the world's first gene-edited babies. (AP Photo/Kin Cheung)

Young women undergoing certain already can store ovarian tissue in hopes of future pregnancy, and Orwig said one day it should be possible to remove, say, a mutation in that tissue that otherwise could spread a family's breast cancer-causing BRCA mutation.

Meanwhile, careful animal work with sperm could "lay the foundation for how one would do it in humans," he said. "When societal views change and policies change, we'll be ready."

Explore further: Q&A on scientist's bombshell claim of gene-edited babies

Related Stories

Q&A on scientist's bombshell claim of gene-edited babies

November 26, 2018
Designer babies might be here sooner than anyone reckoned. A Chinese researcher who says he created gene-edited babies crossed what most scientists consider a forbidden line.

Why geneticists say it's wrong to edit the DNA of embryos to protect them against HIV

November 27, 2018
On Monday, geneticists were just converging on Hong Kong for a long-planned meeting to discuss the future of gene editing. But before many had even collected their name tags, it seemed the future had already arrived.

Scientists think public opinion important before human gene editing

October 3, 2017
The public should be consulted before gene editing is used to treat human embryos, according to a survey of scientists published in the American Heart Association's journal Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics.

Recommended for you

Receiving genetic information can change risk

December 11, 2018
Millions of people in the United States alone have submitted their DNA for analysis and received information that not only predicts their risk for disease but, it turns out, in some cases might also have influenced that risk, ...

HER2 mutations can cause treatment resistance in metastatic ER-positive breast cancer

December 11, 2018
Metastatic breast cancers treated with hormone therapy can become treatment-resistant when they acquire mutations in the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) that were not present in the original tumor, reports ...

How glial cells develop in the brain from neural precursor cells

December 11, 2018
Two types of cells are active in the brain: nerve cells and glial cells. Glial cells have long been regarded primarily as supportive cells, but researchers increasingly recognize that they play an active role in the communication ...

Big datasets pinpoint new regions to explore the genome for disease

December 10, 2018
Imagine rain falling on a square of sidewalk. While the raindrops appear to land randomly, over time a patch of sidewalk somehow remains dry. The emerging pattern suggests something special about this region. This analogy ...

Team seeks to create genetic map of worm's nervous system

December 10, 2018
How do you build a brain? What "rules" govern where neurons end up, how they connect to each other, and which functions they perform?

Genetic study of epilepsy points to potential new therapies

December 10, 2018
The largest study of its kind, led by international researchers including scientists at RCSI (Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland), has discovered 11 new genes associated with epilepsy.

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.