Percutaneous ablation vs. surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma

Compared to surgery, percutaneous liver ablation interventions (IRs) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are associated with lower inhospital mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS), and hospitalization costs, according to a study to be presented at the ARRS 2019 Annual Meeting, set for May 5-10 in Honolulu, HI.

The study was conducted to compare use rates and outcomes of locoregional liver interventions IRs for HCC with surgical procedures.

A total of 557,071 hospitalizations in patients with HCC from 2002 to 2015 were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample database, with an estimated 13,618 IRs and 44,629 surgical procedures performed. Hospitalizations with coexisting diagnoses of secondary hepatic and primary biliary malignancies, and benign hepatobiliary neoplasms, and traumatic liver injuries were excluded from the study.

Over the 14-year period, unadjusted inhospital mortality rate, LOS, and hospitalization costs were higher for surgical procedures, and after adjusting for comorbidity score, year, and patient- and hospital-specific factors, results showed IR was associated with 78% lower inhospital mortality, 37% higher routine discharge to home, 67% lower LOS, and 71% lower cost.


Explore further

No increased risk of complications for joint replacement in ambulatory surgery setting

More information: www.arrs.org/am19
Citation: Percutaneous ablation vs. surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma (2019, May 7) retrieved 17 September 2019 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-05-percutaneous-ablation-surgery-hepatocellular-carcinoma.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more