1993 to 2017 saw decreasing trend in prevalence of spanking

1993 to 2017 saw decreasing trend in prevalence of spanking

(HealthDay)—From 1993 to 2017, there was a decreasing trend in the prevalence of spanking among parents in the United States, according to a research letter published online July 27 in JAMA Pediatrics.

Christopher J. Mehus, Ph.D., and Megan E. Patrick, Ph.D., both from the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, and colleagues used national panel data from the Monitoring the Future study on 25 consecutive cohorts (graduating in 1976 to 2000) assessed 17 years later. The analytic sample included 16,390 participants; respondents with children were asked how often they spank their children.

The researchers found that spanking declined during 25 years in a sample of parents at modal age 35 years with children aged 2 to 12 years. From 1993 to 2017, the modeled prevalence of spanking decreased from 50 to 35 percent. The best fit was provided for a zero-joinpoint model (single decreasing trend). For men and women, the modeled prevalence decreased from 52 to 36 percent and from 48 to 35 percent, respectively, in post hoc analyses. Among a subset of with a child aged 2 to 4 years living at home, the modeled prevalence decreased from 60 to 39 percent.

"Although a was observed, there is a clear need for ongoing education about alternative discipline strategies," the authors write.

Explore further

Pediatricians say no to spanking

More information: Abstract/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Journal information: JAMA Pediatrics

Copyright © 2020 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: 1993 to 2017 saw decreasing trend in prevalence of spanking (2020, July 27) retrieved 28 September 2020 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-07-decreasing-trend-prevalence-spanking.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments