Audible smoke alarm more effective with increasing child age

Audible smoke alarm more effective with increasing child age

Child age has a significant impact on the effectiveness of audible smoke alarms, according to a study published online April 25 in Pediatrics.

Gary A. Smith, M.D., Dr.P.H., from The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus, Ohio, and colleagues used combined data from three previous studies to examine the effect of age on 's response to four types of smoke alarms (, hybrid voice-, low-frequency tone, and high-frequency tone). Data were included for 540 children (, 9 years).

For the four alarm types, the researchers observed a significant increase from 3.1 to 7.6 percent in the proportion of children who awakened for each additional year of age between 5 and 12 years. Child age also had a significant effect on the proportion of children who escaped for each of the four alarm types. There was no difference noted by sex in the proportion of children who awakened or escaped for any of the alarm types. For all alarm types, there was a decrease observed in median time to awaken and median time to escape with increase in child age. For 12-year-olds, only 56.3 percent escaped within one minute of a high-frequency alarm tone, while for children aged 9 years and older, a hybrid voice-low frequency tone was >96 percent effective for awakening and prompting escape within one minute.

"This study provides important new information to help guide prevention recommendations and efforts to reduce residential fire-related injuries and deaths among children," the authors write.

Explore further

Researchers determine more effective ways to awaken children and their families during a house fire

More information: Abstract/Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Journal information: Pediatrics

Copyright © 2022 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Citation: Audible smoke alarm more effective with increasing child age (2022, April 25) retrieved 3 July 2022 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors