Review and commentary on the Sweden's COVID-19 commission inquiry

Review and commentary on the national COVID-19 commission inquiry
Professor and pediatrician Jonas Ludvigsson. Credit: Alexander Donka

Sweden initially chose a different disease prevention and control path during the pandemic than many other European countries. In June 2020, the Swedish Government established a national Commission to examine the management of COVID-19 in Sweden. In a review, Professor Jonas F Ludvigsson summarizes and comments on the findings of the commission inquiry. The review is published in Acta Paediatrica.

The COVID-19 pandemic affected many aspects of daily life in Sweden and led to a dramatic loss of human life, especially among older and poorer residents. It also caused unprecedented disruption to , work, schooling, the care continuum and society and no one escaped its impact. In late June 2020, the Swedish Government established a national COVID-19 Commission to examine how Sweden handled the pandemic. Interim reports were published in 2020 and 2021 with a in February 2022.

"I think the Swedish COVID-19 commission inquiry is a well-written summary and critique of how Sweden approached the pandemic. The pandemic disrupted society and drawing lessons from the report is crucial for our future pandemic preparedness. Despite the importance of the inquiry, I have so far not met any colleague who has actually read the 1,700 pages, and that is why I wrote this review, to make the conclusions of the commission inquiry accessible to more people, says the author of the paper," Professor Jonas F Ludvigsson, pediatrician at Örebro University Hospital and professor at the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet.

In Sweden, the were high in spring 2020, but overall excess mortality in 2020–2021 was +0.79%, which was lower than in many other European countries.

"While the commission is often critical of the management of the pandemic in Sweden, they also underline that voluntary measures that were adopted, including keeping schools open, were appropriate and maintained Swedes' personal freedom during the pandemic," adds Ludvigsson. "However, they also conclude that more extensive and earlier measures should have been taken, especially during the first wave."

The paper by Ludvigsson focuses on health aspects of Sweden's COVID-19 strategy, but also includes an overview of social care in Sweden, the Commission's recommendations for elderly care, a review of postponed and delayed health care in 2020 (for instance diagnosed myocardial infarctions and certain cancer screening decreased), and the commission's recommendations to strengthen preparedness. Finally, the by Ludvigsson also includes a clinical overview of how COVID-19 was treated at Swedish hospitals during the third wave in spring 2021.

More information: Jonas F. Ludvigsson, How Sweden approached the COVID ‐19 pandemic: summary and commentary on the national commission inquiry, Acta Paediatrica (2022). DOI: 10.1111/apa.16535

Journal information: Acta Paediatrica
Citation: Review and commentary on the Sweden's COVID-19 commission inquiry (2022, September 7) retrieved 20 May 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Sweden right not to lockdown for COVID: report


Feedback to editors