Q&A: Transparent face masks restore emotional understanding, but not empathy

Transparent face masks restore emotional understanding, but not empathy
a Example photographs depicting happy, neutral, and sad expressions for Opaque mask, Transparent mask, and No mask conditions; b Sample trial progression. Participants were presented with a contextual sentence for 4000 ms. A fixation cross in duration of 200 ms preceded the presentation of a stimulus photograph displaying a congruent emotion while wearing an opaque mask, a transparent mask, or no mask. The face stimulus was shown for 2000 ms. Affective theory of mind responses were collected by asking participants to rate, on a scale from 1 (negative/low) to 9 (positive/high), how positive or negative the protagonist was feeling and the intensity of their emotion. Each response screen remained visible until response. Credit: Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications (2022). DOI: 10.1186/s41235-022-00411-8

Mask-wearing has become the norm for many since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite their effectiveness in preventing the spread of viruses, opaque masks impair our ability to understand and convey emotions, a group of McGill University researchers has found.

McGill University researchers Jelena Ristic, Full Professor in the Department of Psychology, and Sarah McCrackin, Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Psychology, discuss whether transparent masks reduce the negative impacts on social .

Here is a Q&A with Ristic and McCrackin:

What did you set out to find?

Because our group previously found that obscuring face parts significantly impairs our ability to perceive emotions, the goal of our latest research was to examine if covering the lower face also impacted our ability to relate to others emotionally. Then, we examined if transparent face masks were effective in restoring socio-communicative abilities, as they allow for visual transmission of facial cues.

What is new or groundbreaking in this paper?

This paper is the first to report that our ability to understand and share emotions with others is impaired when individuals are wearing opaque masks. We are also one of the first to examine whether transparent face masks might reduce of obscuring faces on social communication.

We found that while transparent masks restored emotional understanding, they did not restore our ability to empathize with others. This is an important distinction because it suggests that wearing transparent instead of opaque masks may restore some but not all aspects of our social typical communication. This was surprising and suggests that any facial physical barrier presents hurdles in relating to people.

Why is this important?

These data suggest that our abilities to infer and share with others are impaired when the lower face is covered with a mask, even a transparent one, and thus emotional messages may be lost. This is important for all and especially in medical and where emotion and empathy are essential cues to our social understanding of others.

Wearing clear masks may provide a partial solution to this communication barrier, reducing some of the negative social impact of opaque masks.

The research was published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications.

More information: Sarah D. McCrackin et al, Transparent masks reduce the negative impact of opaque masks on understanding emotional states but not on sharing them, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications (2022). DOI: 10.1186/s41235-022-00411-8

Provided by McGill University
Citation: Q&A: Transparent face masks restore emotional understanding, but not empathy (2022, October 18) retrieved 24 February 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2022-10-qa-transparent-masks-emotional-empathy.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Face masks found to impair nonverbal communication between individuals


Feedback to editors