PET technology found to be more effective than angiogram at determining need for coronary stents, bypass surgery

PET technology more effective than angiogram at determining need for coronary stents, bypass surgery
Central illustration. Credit: JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging (2022). DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.05.016

A new method for determining whether patients with heart disease need coronary stents or bypass surgery is more effective than the angiogram, which is currently used, according to research from UTHealth Houston Heart & Vascular.

A team led by K. Lance Gould, MD, professor and the Martin Bucksbaum Distinguished University Chair in Heart Disease with McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston, used (PET) imaging technology to map and its outcomes—namely, subendocardial ischemia—among patients with . The study was published in JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging.

Most forms of heart disease cause myocardial damage. Myocardial ischemia occurs when blood flow to the heart is reduced, preventing the from receiving enough oxygen. When affects the deep, or subendocardial, layer of the left ventricular muscle, it is known as subendocardial ischemia.

Subendocardial ischemia is commonly diagnosed in patients with , but it is not quantified by current imaging tools. Gould's team developed the PET technology, software, and clinical validation for defining the size and severity of this early stage of coronary artery disease.

"The cumulative data reveals that all randomized trials of coronary stents and bypass surgery have failed to improve survival after revascularization due to profoundly flawed patient selection based on the angiogram," said Gould, who was first author on the study. "Thus, the coronary angiogram is not the gold standard for determining stents or bypass surgery, but rather, quantitative myocardial perfusion by PET is the gold standard."

Significantly, the paper confirmed the team's previous research by proving the PET threshold of severity at which stents and bypass surgery improve survival compared to medical treatment alone. The angiogram—an X-ray test that helps doctors evaluate blockages in the arterial system—shows how to do stents or bypass surgery, Gould said, but not whether those procedures should be done at all.

Gould, who began working at UTHealth Houston in 1979 as a professor and director of the division of cardiology, stepped aside from administrative duties in 1987 to focus clinically and scientifically on PET imaging and quantitative coronary arteriography for identifying segmental and diffuse coronary artery disease, measuring its severity and reversing it by vigorous risk factor modification.

"Several equally paradigm-changing papers are underway for the coming year," Gould said. "For example, our preliminary data show that virtual revascularization on cardiac PET images predicts survival outcomes before actually doing stents or , as a guide to making decisions for or against those procedures."

More information: K. Lance Gould et al, Subendocardial and Transmural Myocardial Ischemia, JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging (2022). DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.05.016

Citation: PET technology found to be more effective than angiogram at determining need for coronary stents, bypass surgery (2022, November 30) retrieved 25 April 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2022-11-pet-technology-effective-angiogram-coronary.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

AI tool predicts reduced blood flow to the heart

8 shares

Feedback to editors