Three approaches with a reputation for slowing aging processes proven largely ineffective

Longevity treatments do not slow aging
To what extent can aging, measured as a multidimensional representation of age-dependent phenotypic change, be slowed in mice? a To estimate aging trajectories for a wide range of age-sensitive phenotypes (ASPs), we examined phenotypes across the lifespan of C57BL/6J mice, including hundreds of phenotypes derived from multi-dimensional deep phenotyping, a range of molecular markers as well as transcriptomic profiles. b We assessed three important pro-longevity interventions for their effects on aging (putative anti-aging interventions; PAAIs). For each PAAI, we generated a young as well as an old cohort of experimental animals and controls, all of which were analyzed concurrently in one single study. For each phenotype in each of these studies, we determined age effects, intervention effects and intervention × age interactions based on the data derived from young and old control as well as experimental animals. These analyses revealed that some ASPs were influenced (countered or accentuated) by the PAAIs, others not. For ASPs countered by PAAIs, we considered the following scenarios: PAAIs could influence ASPs in a way consistent with slowing the rate of age-dependent change in ASPs (rate effect), via age-independent effects on ASPs (baseline effect) or via a combination of rate and baseline effects. To address what the age at first detectable change is for each ASP influenced by an intervention, we intersected data on ASPs from these intervention studies (see panel b) with data from our baseline study (see panel a). We compared effect sizes to examine for each ASP individually whether PAAI effects differed measurably between young and old mice. In addition, we used dimensionality reduction approaches as well as intraclass correlation analyses of intervention effect sizes in young and old animals to determine whether PAAIs overall act on ASPs primarily in a way consistent with slowing their rate of age-dependent change (left panels), via age-independent effects (right panels) or via a combination of rate and baseline effects (middle panels). For further details on our analytical approach, see Supplementary Fig. 1. Created with BioRender.com. Credit: Nature Communications (2022). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34515-y

Three approaches with a reputation for slowing aging processes have proven largely ineffective. For their study, researchers developed a new method to measure aging, which accounts for the complexity of aging in organisms.

In the new study, researchers have taken a close look at three approaches that have been widely believed to slow the aging process. However, when tested in , these treatments proved largely ineffective in their supposed impact on aging.

"There is no internal clock of aging that you can regulate with a simple switch—at least not in the form of the treatments studied here," concludes Dr. Dan Ehninger of the DZNE, the initiator of the study. The team has developed a new analytical approach to make influences on aging processes measurable.

The study, the results of which have now been published in the journal Nature Communications, involved researchers from DZNE, Helmholtz Munich and the German Center for Diabetes (DZD). "We chose three regulators for our interventions that many experts believe slow down aging," explains Prof. Dr. Martin Hrabě de Angelis, head of the Institute of Experimental Genetics and director of the German Mouse Clinic at Helmholtz Munich, who also drove the project with his team.

One of them is intermittent fasting, in which the calories consumed are reduced. Number two targets a central node of cell metabolism (mTOR), which is also the target of the supposed "anti-aging drug" rapamycin. Number three, in turn, interferes with the release of growth hormone. Similar treatments are also used by humans, although their efficacy with regard to aging has not been sufficiently proven.

For the assessment in mice, the scientists developed a new answer to the question of how to measure aging. "Many researchers in recent decades have used lifespan as an indirect measure of aging," explains Dan Ehninger, who is a senior scientist at DZNE. So, for example, how old do mice get—and how can that lifespan be extended?

"It is often assumed that if they just live longer, they will also age more slowly. But the problem is that mice, like many other organisms, do not die from general old age, but from very specific diseases," says Ehninger. For example, up to 90% of mice die from tumors that form in their bodies at an advanced age. "So, if you were to look at the whole genome for factors that make mice become long-lived, you would like find many genes that suppress tumor development—and not necessarily genes that play a general role in aging."

For their study, the scientists therefore chose an approach that does not emphasize lifespan, but rather focused on a comprehensive investigation of age-related changes in a wide range of bodily functions. "You can think of it as a complete health status survey," says Martin Hrabě de Angelis.

"The health check results in a compendium of hundreds of factors covering many areas of physiology"—an exact description of the state of the animal at the moment of examination.

That's exactly the approach the researchers applied to the animals subjected to one of the three treatment approaches that supposedly slow aging. Across different life stages, they were analyzed and compared: How much does each parameter typically change at a given stage of life? And, do parameters change more slowly when the mice are given one of the three treatments? This makes it possible to determine precisely whether the natural can be slowed, and with it the deterioration of important physiological functions.

The results were unambiguous. Although the researchers were able to identify individual cases in which old mice looked younger than they actually were it was clear that "this effect was not due to slowing down aging, but rather due to age-independent factors," says Dan Ehninger. "The fact that a treatment already has its effect in young mice—prior to the appearance of age-dependent change in health measures—proves that these are compensatory, general health-promoting effects, not a targeting of aging mechanisms."

The DZNE and Helmholtz Diabetes Center teams have now set their sights on the next goal. They want to investigate other treatment approaches that experts believe can slow aging. The researchers' hope: The new research method will provide a more comprehensive picture of possible treatment approaches and their effectiveness.

More information: Kan Xie et al, Deep phenotyping and lifetime trajectories reveal limited effects of longevity regulators on the aging process in C57BL/6J mice, Nature Communications (2022). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34515-y

Journal information: Nature Communications
Provided by Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen e.V. (DZNE)
Citation: Three approaches with a reputation for slowing aging processes proven largely ineffective (2022, December 14) retrieved 26 April 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2022-12-approaches-reputation-aging-proven-largely.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Do women age differently from men?

107 shares

Feedback to editors