This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:


peer-reviewed publication

trusted source


Study identifies novel genetic causes of male infertility

Study identifies novel genetic causes of male infertility
Decomposition of testis gene expression patterns with sparse decomposition of arrays (SDA). a We applied sparse decomposition analysis (SDA) to testis scRNA-seq data from 12 human donors to identify latent factors (‘components’) representing gene modules. These components are defined by two vectors—one that indicates the loading of each cell on the component, and one that indicates the loading of each gene on the component. b The same scRNA-seq data was summarized using a conventional tSNE analysis, and testicular cell types labels assigned to all cells. c By plotting the cell scores for three representative germ cell components on the tSNE, and as a function of pseudotime, it is apparent that transcription during spermatogenesis can be modeled as series of components overlapping in time, coming on and off gradually on different timescales. Shown are components with activity that start in spermatogonia (35), spermatocytes (59), and spermatids (92). Credit: Nature Communications (2022). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35661-z

A recent study published in Nature Communications has identified novel genetic causes of non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), the most severe form of male infertility, findings that improve the characterization of the disorder and may inform future treatment strategies and interventions.

NOA occurs in 1% of all men and is virtually incurable. Except in cases where a person has undergone radiation or , the underlying etiology of NOA usually remains unknown.

"This is important because if a man was known to have an underlying genetic etiology of NOA, you would know to not do a sperm extraction procedure to try to retrieve sperm for fertility purposes," said Emily Jungheim, MD, the Edmond Confino, MD, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, chief of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and a co-author of the study.

In the current study, investigators performed sequenced exomes—the coding portions of —in DNA samples from more than 1,000 men diagnosed with NOA who were enrolled in the GEnetics of Male INfertility Initiative (GEMINI) study.

In 20% of these men, the investigators identified more than 200 genes with known roles in sperm production and after integrating single-cell RNA sequencing data, they also found more than 20 molecular subgroups of NOA genes with synchronized gene expression patterns. In mouse models of NOA, they also similar molecular subgroups of these genes, confirming their findings.

Ultimately, understanding the underlying genetic etiologies of reproductive diseases in both men and women can help clinicians know when and how to apply treatments more efficiently, more effectively and at lower costs, according to Jungheim.

"Genetic testing in is largely limited to testing embryos—we have very little diagnostic testing available for people who fall short of making embryos. We are often left throwing our hands up and trying treatment after treatment until we have nothing left to offer except donor gametes. It would be better for everyone if we could provide answers instead," Jungheim said.

More information: Liina Nagirnaja et al, Diverse monogenic subforms of human spermatogenic failure, Nature Communications (2022). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35661-z

Journal information: Nature Communications
Citation: Study identifies novel genetic causes of male infertility (2023, February 13) retrieved 20 May 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Insurance coverage for IVF increases chance of having baby


Feedback to editors