This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

trusted source

proofread

Antibiotic bone cement found not to reduce infection after hip replacement

pelvis xray
Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

A large trial has found that using high-dose dual-antibiotic loaded cement is unlikely to reduce the risk of surgical site infection in people who have had a hip replacement.

In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the use of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in hip fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty—the replacement of the head of the femur.

In this trial, the research team compared the rate of deep surgical site infection in patients aged over 60 receiving high-dose dual-antibiotic loaded cement with standard care single-antibiotic-loaded cement. The findings have been published in The Lancet.

The study, part of the White 8 Trial, was led by researchers from the University of Oxford's Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS) and supported by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Center (BRC). It is sponsored by the Northumbria Heathcare NHS Foundation Trust and managed by Oxford Trauma, at the University of Oxford.

The main author, Professor Matt Costa of NDORMS, said, "Over the last two years, based upon previous smaller trial data, there has been a big increase in the use of high-dose, dual-antibiotic bone cement. However, this large-scale trial shows that there is unlikely to be a benefit in terms of reducing the risk of surgical site infection.

"Furthermore, our associated health suggests that the more expensive high-dose dual antibiotic cement is unlikely to be cost effective. I would anticipate that these findings will change and reverse the trend of using this new bone cement."

Almost 5,000 patients undergoing cemented hemiarthroplasty at 26 U.K. hospitals took part in the trial. Half were randomly allocated to a standard care single-antibiotic loaded cement, with the other half given the high-dose dual-antibiotic loaded cement. The level of deep surgical site infection was then measured after 90 days.

Some 1.7% of the participants in the single-antibiotic loaded cement had a deep surgical site infection after 90 days, compared to 1.2% of those in the dual-antibiotic loaded group.

The trial also assessed quality of life, mortality, antibiotic use, mobility and residential status after 120 days.

More information: Nickil R Agni et al, High-dose dual-antibiotic loaded cement for hip hemiarthroplasty in the UK (WHiTE 8): a randomised controlled trial, The Lancet (2023). DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00962-5

Journal information: The Lancet
Citation: Antibiotic bone cement found not to reduce infection after hip replacement (2023, June 22) retrieved 27 April 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-06-antibiotic-bone-cement-infection-hip.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Novel antibiotic cement to treat bone infections

4 shares

Feedback to editors