This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

proofread

How much does a shrunken blastocyst adversely affect implantation and pregnancy?

How much does a shrunken blastocyst adversely affect implantation and pregnancy?
A fully re-expanded blastocyst (left) and a shrunken blastocyst with insufficient re-expansion (right). Credit: Ayumu Ito

Obstetricians and gynecologists at Toho University, Japan examined 1,331 cases of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles and found that blastocysts showing shrinkage at the time of transfer had a low success rate in terms of assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes, demonstrating the adverse effect of shrinkage.

To evaluate blastocyst quality, ART physicians primarily use the method developed by Gardner in 1999, which is a morphological evaluation that assesses blastocoele expansion, inner cell mass, and the trophectoderm. Typically, a blastocyst with a grade of 3BB or higher was deemed a good-quality blastocyst (GQB), whereas those below 3BB were considered non-GQBs.

Although the grading system helps predict ART results to some extent, this method remains unsatisfactory, and a more accurate embryo evaluation approach is desired.

In the process called "vitrification," one of the currently mainstream embryo freezing methods, the cytoplasm of the blastocyst is dehydrated and shrunk. This process prevents water crystallization within embryos and protects them from damage. The blastocysts are thawed at the time of embryo transfer.

During thawing, water gradually returns to the cytoplasm to re-expand the shrunken embryo. However, in some cases, when embryos are loaded into a catheter for transfer several hours after thawing, they may shrink again owing to inadequate re-expansion. Blastocyst shrinkage after thawing is known to have a negative impact on ART outcomes; however, the extent to which it has this negative effect remains unknown.

How much does a shrunken blastocyst adversely affect implantation and pregnancy?
For improved visualization, this figure is color-coded green, yellow-green, yellow, and orange, with the highest probability number divided into quartiles in ascending order of blastocoele expansion, trophectoderm (TE), and inner cell mass (ICM). All units are presented as percentages (%), and the numbers in parentheses represent the number of cycles in the re-expansion or shrinkage groups. Credit: Ayumu Ito

This information is of concern not only to the patient undergoing embryo transfer but also to the physician performing the procedure. The purpose of this study was to obtain accurate data on the effect of such shrinkage on ART and provide new insights into by combining the evaluation of embryo dynamics after freezing and thawing in parallel with conventional pre-freezing morphology evaluation.

The researchers examined 999 GQBs and 332 non-GQBs that underwent frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles between April 2017 and March 2022. Blastocyst shrinkage occurred in 15.4% of embryos, with the shrinkage group showing lower rates of implantation, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live births than the re-expansion group. This trend persisted even when GQBs and non-GQBs were analyzed separately.

Odds ratios indicated reduced chances of success in the shrinkage group, especially for non-GQBs and women aged ≥ 35 years. A multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age, non-GQB status, blastocyst stage after day six, and post-warming shrinkage as independent predictors of clinical pregnancy.

The probability of a blastocyst shrinking after warming and recovery culturing was higher in non-GQBs, women aged ≥ 35 years, and embryos reaching the blastocyst stage after day six. The researchers concluded that post-warming blastocyst shrinkage adversely affects ART outcomes.

How much does a shrunken blastocyst adversely affect implantation and pregnancy?
Odds ratios for implantation, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live births of blastocysts with shrinkage. Credit: Ayumu Ito

"In our study, we evaluated the pre-cryopreservation morphology, conducted a post-warming assessment, and summarized the outcomes. Our findings offer both patients and a tangible reference regarding the detrimental impact of blastocyst contraction on ART results."

"We recommend a comprehensive evaluation combining pre-cryopreservation morphology and post-warming assessment for improved embryo selection and better patient outcomes," said Dr. Ayumu Ito, MD, Ph.D., the lead author from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Toho University Medical Center Omori Hospital. The study was published in the Journal of Ovarian Research.

More information: Ayumo Ito et al, Effect of blastocyst shrinkage on assisted reproductive outcomes: a retrospective cohort study describing a new morphological evaluation of blastocyst pre-vitrification and post-warming, Journal of Ovarian Research (2023). DOI: 10.1186/s13048-023-01276-1

Provided by Toho University
Citation: How much does a shrunken blastocyst adversely affect implantation and pregnancy? (2023, December 11) retrieved 27 April 2024 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-12-shrunken-blastocyst-adversely-affect-implantation.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Two emerging trends in treatment explain steady increase in IVF success rates

0 shares

Feedback to editors