This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:


peer-reviewed publication

trusted source


Research investigates limited efficacy of common local anesthetic

Limited efficacy of common local anesthetic
Mean ± SD sensory scores (obtained by pinprick testing during the in-hospital sessions. Credit: Anesthesiology (2024). DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004988

Liposomal bupivacaine was launched on the market 12 years ago to provide long-lasting local control of pain. The medication is used as a local anesthetic, particularly for orthopedic operations. A research study by MedUni Vienna has now shown the limited effectiveness of the substance.

The study has been published in the journal Anesthesiology.

The research was conducted as a collaboration between scientists from the Department of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Management and the Department of Clinical Pharmacology with 25 healthy volunteers in a randomized, controlled and triple-blinded design.

The study participants were randomly assigned to receive two with bupivacaine for , one in the conventional and one in the liposomal form. Liposomal means that the is encapsulated in vesicles called liposomes, which should enable a slower release over a longer period of time.

"Since the combination of both forms of bupivacaine is recommended, little was known about the effectiveness of the use of liposomal bupivacaine alone in pain therapy during and immediately after surgery," says co-first author Peter Marhofer, summarizing the initial situation.

As the research showed, the administration of liposomal bupivacaine produced successful surgical blockade in around a third of the test subjects, compared to 100% after administration of the conventional form. "This suggests that liposomal bupivacaine alone is not sufficient to control pain during surgery," concludes anesthetist Peter Marhofer.

As far as longer-lasting post-operative efficacy is concerned, liposomal bupivacaine did lead to a reduction in pain sensitivity in the affected area of the body that lasted for 3.5 days. "However, based on our findings, this effect cannot be regarded as reliable," says Marhofer, "as the effectiveness was unpredictable even within a single test subject and sometimes decreased and increased again several times over time."

Further research for safe use

As a special form of bupivacaine, which was introduced in 1963, liposomal bupivacaine was developed with the aim of ensuring long-lasting regional pain control. Its mode of action is based on the local blocking of nerve conduction, which prevents pain signals from being transmitted from the anesthetized area to the brain.

By prolonging the duration of action, patients should experience less pain after surgery and require fewer opioids, which in turn should reduce the risk of addiction and other undesirable side effects. In , liposomal bupivacaine is typically used for local anesthesia, particularly in orthopedic surgery.

"Our study showed unpredictable effects of liposomal bupivacaine in terms of nerve block and associated pain relief. Based on our findings, the substance cannot currently be recommended for use in pain therapy during and after surgery," says study principal investigator Markus Zeitlinger.

More information: Markus Zadrazil et al, Liposomal Bupivacaine for Peripheral Nerve Blockade: A Randomized, Controlled, Crossover, Triple-blinded Pharmacodynamic Study in Volunteers, Anesthesiology (2024). DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004988

Journal information: Anesthesiology
Citation: Research investigates limited efficacy of common local anesthetic (2024, May 13) retrieved 15 June 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Liposomal bupivacaine block no aid for cesarean pain


Feedback to editors