This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:


trusted source


Researchers investigate the relationship between perceived glossiness and pupillary responses

Relationship between perceived glossiness and pupillary responses
Stimuli and procedure. (A) Examples of the stimuli. Top: original; bottom: shuffled. (B) The flow of the shuffling process. The patch size shrank in a step-by-step manner from 64 × 64 to 1 × 1 pixels. In the binary images of the two middle steps, the white regions indicate remaining pixels for further shuffling. (C) The sequence of one trial of the experiment. Note that the ratio of the screen to the fixation point and the stimulus in this panel differs from the actual ratio used in this study. Credit: Vision Research (2024). DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2024.108393

The association between perceived glossiness and pupillary response has previously been elucidated through a collaborative effort involving the Cognitive Neurotechnology Unit and the Visual Perception and Cognition Laboratory in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at the Toyohashi University of Technology.

The phenomenon of pupillary constriction in response to bright visual stimuli has further been widely acknowledged. The researchers' latest investigation revealed that, after adjusting for uniform physical luminance levels among images, images perceived as highly glossy elicited greater pupil constriction. Their work is published in the journal Vision Research.

The pupil is responsible for modulating the quantity of light entering the eye; to achieve this, it undergoes constriction in response to visually bright stimuli, and dilation when exposed to dark objects. Owing to the inherent difficulty of voluntarily controlling pupil size, in recent years, the pupillary response has garnered significant attention as an objective metric to probe the mechanisms underlying visual processing.

Recent studies have revealed that, despite uniform physical luminance levels, varies in response to illusory images perceived as subjectively brighter or darker. However, the mechanism by which pupils react to images perceived as possessing either high or low glossiness remains poorly understood.

Hence, the researchers conducted psychophysical experiments using images depicting various objects characterized by different levels of glossiness. The participants were asked to assess the perceived glossiness of the images presented to them on a 7-point scale.

Concurrently, the participants' pupil diameters were recorded using an eye-movement-measuring device throughout the experiment. All images were adjusted to standardize their luminance levels, ensuring that the pupil diameter remained unaffected by physical luminance variations among the images. Furthermore, the experiment was performed in a dimly illuminated room, maintained at a consistent brightness level, to mitigate the influence of ambient brightness on the experimental conditions.

The experimental findings indicated that, despite uniform physical luminance, the observation of images perceived as possessing high glossiness induced pupil constriction, as depicted in the accompanying figure. The presence of white regions termed "specular highlights" in highly glossy images creates an impression within the visual system of light reflection.

Consequently, it is conceivable that the observed pupil constriction may be attributed to these highlights, despite the absence of actual alterations in light intensity. This finding is consistent with prior research documenting the influence of bright illusory images on pupillary responses.

Assistant Professor Hideki Tamura of the Cognitive Neurotechnology Unit of the Department of Computer Science and Engineering, who proposed the concept for this research, explained this phenomenon as follows, "When observing objects with high glossiness, such as precious metals, you get the impression that they sparkle, even when the objects are not moving. If pupils responded to brightness illusions, we thought that they may also respond to highly glossy objects, which led to the idea of this research."

This study is the first to clarify the relationship between subjective glossiness and pupillary responses. Textural characteristics such as glossiness and transparency have a notable influence on the perceived value of an object.

They propose that future studies are needed to investigate whether this phenomenon extends to diverse textures, thereby fostering a more comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying value judgments pertaining to objects within the visual system.

More information: Hideki Tamura et al, Glossiness perception and its pupillary response, Vision Research (2024). DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2024.108393

Citation: Researchers investigate the relationship between perceived glossiness and pupillary responses (2024, May 9) retrieved 23 June 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Pupillary response to glare illusions of different colors


Feedback to editors