Ohio residents: Medical and health research important to state's economy, jobs and incomes

Ohioans broadly support a strong commitment to medical and health research and recognize its direct link to job creation and the state's and the nation's economy, according to a new statewide poll conducted by IBOPE Zogby for Research!America and Northeast Ohio Medical University (NEOMED).

A strong majority of Ohioans (86%) thinks medical and research is important—42% say very important—to the state's . Eight in 10 believe spending money on scientific research is important to Ohio's economy in terms of jobs and incomes.

Nine in 10 (92%) Ohioans think it is important—62% say very important—for the state to be a leader in medical and health research, but only half say the state is a leader in this area. Nearly as many (88%) say it is important for the state to be a leader in science and technology, but just 28% think it is.

The poll findings were released today at a forum convened by NEOMED and Research!America in Rootstown, Ohio.

"The strong public support by Ohioans for research is a reflection of the growth and strength of medical and health R&D conducted by the universities and academic health centers in our state," said Jay A. Gershen, D.D.S, Ph.D., president of the University. "Ohio's universities are building the state's leadership in medical and health research, educating health professionals to work in underserved areas and creating innovative collaborations with the state's growing life science industry and broader business community."

Fully 85% say it is important—47% say very important—for Ohio to support the education of health professionals for rural and urban underserved communities. Six in 10 believe it is very important for Ohio to encourage young people to pursue careers that require a solid education in science, and nearly as many (57%) say it is very important that Ohio create more opportunities for careers in science and research.

"These poll results show the strong priority Ohio residents place on medical and scientific research and that they understand the link between strong investment in research and science education, and economic prosperity," said Mary Woolley, president and CEO of Research!America. "This widespread support should send a resounding message to policy makers about the critical need for continued investment in medical and scientific research."

Nearly half (49%) of Ohioans say that the 5½ cents of each health dollar the nation spent in 2009 on medical and health research was not enough, and 60% say it is a top or high priority to accelerate our nation's investment in research to improve health. One-third say it is primarily the federal government's responsibility to accelerate that investment; 28% say private industry; and 20%, research institutions or universities.

"Our survey research clearly shows that vast majorities of people in Ohio feel strongly about the importance of medical and to the economy of the state and that it is important for Ohio to support the education of health professionals for rural and urban undeserved communities," said John Zogby, chairman of the board and chief insights officer, IBOPE Zogby International. "These results are compelling, and interestingly, they often transcend political ideologies and party lines."

Further findings from the Ohio poll include:

  • 81% say they would approve of their state offering financial incentives to companies to attract new scientific research labs or companies;
  • 97% think education and training in science, technology, engineering and mathematics is important—78% say very important—to U.S. competitiveness and future economic prosperity;
  • 90% of Ohioans say it is important that elected officials at all levels listen to advice from scientists and public when setting policy or spending priorities; and
  • 62% agree that basic research which advances the frontiers of knowledge is necessary and should be supported by the federal government, even if it brings no immediate benefits.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Poll finds concerns about pace of medical and health research

May 20, 2010

Nearly three-quarters of Americans are confident in our system for reviewing the effectiveness and safety of new medicines and medical devices, yet 41% say it takes too long to approve a drug and allow it to be sold to consumers. ...

Recommended for you

Exploring 3-D printing to make organs for transplants

22 hours ago

Printing whole new organs for transplants sounds like something out of a sci-fi movie, but the real-life budding technology could one day make actual kidneys, livers, hearts and other organs for patients ...

High frequency of potential entrapment gaps in hospital beds

23 hours ago

A survey of beds within a large teaching hospital in Ireland has shown than many of them did not comply with dimensional standards put in place to minimise the risk of entrapment. The report, published online in the journal ...

Key element of CPR missing from guidelines

Jul 29, 2014

Removing the head tilt/chin lift component of rescue breaths from the latest cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines could be a mistake, according to Queen's University professor Anthony Ho.

Burnout impacts transplant surgeons (w/ Video)

Jul 28, 2014

Despite saving thousands of lives yearly, nearly half of organ transplant surgeons report a low sense of personal accomplishment and 40% feel emotionally exhausted, according to a new national study on transplant surgeon ...

User comments