Four-year-olds know that being right is not enough
August 18, 2011 in Psychology & PsychiatryAs they grow, children learn a lot about the world from what other people tell them. Along the way, they have to figure out who is a reliable source of information. A new study, which will be published in an upcoming issue of Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, finds that when children reach around 4 years, they start noticing whether someone is actually knowledgeable or if they're just getting the answers from someone else.
Earlier studies have found that children as young as age three pay attention to whether someone is an accurate information source. If someone gives correct information, they'll go back to that person for more answers. But Shiri Einav of Oxford Brookes University in the UK thought there was more to the story. "If you give a correct response it doesn't necessarily mean you're knowledgeable" she says. "You could be accurate because you asked someone else for help or you could be accurate by a complete fluke." Einav and her coauthor, Elizabeth Robinson of Warwick University, wanted to know whether children assessing the reliability of others take into account the reasons for others' accuracy.
For their study, Einav and Robinson used puppets and a teddy bear to test children. A child would hold up a picture of an elephant, cow, or rabbit for each puppet to identify. Both puppets labeled all animals correctly but one puppet always knew the answer without any help, whereas the other puppet always relied on help from Ted. Then, Ted was removed so he couldn't help the puppets anymore and the child was given a picture of an unfamiliar animala mongooseand asked which puppet could tell them what it was.
Three-year-olds were equally likely to choose the puppet who'd known the answers on its own and the puppet that got help from Ted. But four- and five-year-olds were more discriminating: They invested more trust in the puppet whose accuracy reflected independent knowledge rather than being dependent on an external source. "We think it's important that from the age of around four, children are being sophisticated in a way that people hadn't really shown before," Einav says. "They're able to distinguish someone who's truly knowledgeable from someone who's given them a right answer but doesn't necessarily deserve long-term trust." This useful skill allows children to seek out people who are likely to be particularly beneficial for their learning.
Provided by
Association for Psychological Science
-
Preschoolers use statistics to understand others
Aug 17, 2010 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Psychologists say babies know right from wrong even at six months
May 10, 2010 |
not rated yet |
0
-
The good, the bad and the baby (w/ video)
Mar 29, 2011 |
not rated yet |
0
-
A single interaction affects the way a child seeks information, study finds
Sep 01, 2010 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Critical thinking: How do children learn who to trust?
Mar 22, 2011 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Of mice and mental models: Neuroscientific implications of risk-optimized behavior in the mouse
13 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
-
Limits to growth: Scientists identify key metastasis-enabling enzyme
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (4) |
0
-
Seeing is as seeing does: Spatially-structured retinal input in early development of cortical maps
Apr 26, 2012 |
5 / 5 (4) |
1
-
Dreamless nights: Brain activity during nonrapid eye movement sleep
Apr 09, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (12) |
0
-
Take your time: Neurobiology sheds light on the superiority of spaced vs. massed learning
Mar 28, 2012 |
4.5 / 5 (21) |
3
-
A question about drug tolerance
May 23, 2012
-
Poor nutrition leading to overeating?
May 23, 2012
-
Math and dyslexia?
May 21, 2012
-
portable metabolism meter?
May 21, 2012
-
Rare medical conditions on 20/20 tonight
May 18, 2012
-
"Good" Cholesterol in Doubt
May 17, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Medical Sciences
More news stories
More mental health care urged for kids who self-harm
(HealthDay) -- Doctors have long known that some kids suffering severe emotional turmoil find relief in physical pain -- cutting or burning or sticking themselves with pins to achieve a form of release.
Psychology & Psychiatry
9 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
Questionable research practices surprisingly common
(Medical Xpress) -- Not all scientific misconduct is flat-out fraud. Much falls into the murkier realm of questionable research practices. A new study finds that in one field, psychology, these practices are surprisingly ...
Psychology & Psychiatry
13 hours ago |
not rated yet |
0
|
Feeling strong emotions makes peoples' brains 'tick together'
Experiencing strong emotions synchronises brain activity across individuals, research team at Aalto University and Turku PET Centre in Finland has revealed.
Psychology & Psychiatry
May 24, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
0
Formal recognition of PMDD will lift stigma for women
A decision to recognise premenstrual dysphoric disorder as a genuine psychiatric condition will finally provide validation for this awful and poorly understood syndrome and alleviate the stigma ...
Psychology & Psychiatry
May 24, 2012 |
2 / 5 (1) |
1
Long-term meditation leads to different brain organization
(Medical Xpress) -- People who practice mindfulness meditation learn to accept their feelings, emotions, and states of mind without judging or resisting them. They simply live in the moment.
Psychology & Psychiatry
May 24, 2012 |
5 / 5 (5) |
0
|
Of mice and mental models: Neuroscientific implications of risk-optimized behavior in the mouse
(Medical Xpress) -- Regardless of an organism’s biological complexity, every encephalized animal continuously makes under-informed behavioral choices that can have serious consequences. Despite its ubiquity, ...
Tongue analysis software uses ancient Chinese medicine to warn of disease
For 5,000 years, the Chinese have used a system of medicine based on the flow and balance of positive and negative energies in the body. In this system, the appearance of the tongue is one of the measures used to classify ...
Cancer may require simpler genetic mutations than previously thought
Chromosomal deletions in DNA often involve just one of two gene copies inherited from either parent. But scientists haven't known how a deletion in one gene from one parent, called a "hemizygous" deletion, can contribute ...
Skp2 activates cancer-promoting, glucose-processing Akt
HER2 and its epidermal growth factor receptor cousins mobilize a specialized protein to activate a major player in cancer development and sugar metabolism, scientists report in the May 25 issue of Cell.
Inherited DNA change explains overactive leukemia gene
A small inherited change in DNA is largely responsible for overactivating a gene linked to poor treatment response in people with acute leukemia.
Early physical therapist treatment associated with reduced risk of healthcare utilization and reduced overall healthcare
A new study published in Spine shows that early treatment by a physical therapist for low back pain (LBP), as compared to delayed treatment, was associated with reduced risk of subsequent healthcare utilization and lower ...
Aug 18, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
O.k. I'm game. Let me play too:
You got this from earlier studies? Careful now.
Cognitive bias.
The first God for all children are parents. The parents, when the child finally understands their language, talked of other Gods.
In the beginning,
there was l..., le..., len...,leni..., lenin.
(I stutter a lot)
Trust is good, control is better.
Total control relies on nothing. That accuracy is perfect, regardless of reasoning.
Aug 19, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Aug 19, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Dear ToM,
We, my twin and I have decided to part from you. We had long discussions about you in the womb before we were born. We decided for the sake of science - your bread and butter - that we play dumb for you - you needed something to do and you, ToM, were the perfect person to keep yourself busy. So we offered no 'evidence' for you, ToM, at birth.
ToM, you are a dreamer, a theorizer. You simply went ahead and extrapolate our internal mental states and pasted a time table to this to boot. That is inconsiderate, rude and unscientific. Do you remember, ToM? We played peek-a-boo together, A FEW WEEKS AFTER BIRTH. You went ahead anyway, called us deficit(!!!) until we pointed fingers THREE YEARS LATER! We were just an object to you, ToM, until the finger pointing began. Wholly inadequate for you, ToM.
We are tired, ToM, of you taking us to task(s). We now ask you to leave.
Take care
Aug 19, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
This is like pushing salience in the womb. Forget it. You have all been there. And forgotten that salience was not a part of our learning world there. And we learned more there, than at any other time of our lives.
A total rethink of psychiatry, psychology, and neuroscience is in order.
Just as bad as the astrophysical society with black holes and gravitational waves!!!
I going to be sick now, excuse me.
Aug 19, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
RKS are you in love?!?!? You don't need ToM. Take our word for it. ToM is bad for you. Alright. Just don't say we did not warn you.