Four-year-olds know that being right is not enough
August 18, 2011 in Psychology & Psychiatry
As they grow, children learn a lot about the world from what other people tell them. Along the way, they have to figure out who is a reliable source of information. A new study, which will be published in an upcoming issue of Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, finds that when children reach around 4 years, they start noticing whether someone is actually knowledgeable or if they're just getting the answers from someone else.
Earlier studies have found that children as young as age three pay attention to whether someone is an accurate information source. If someone gives correct information, they'll go back to that person for more answers. But Shiri Einav of Oxford Brookes University in the UK thought there was more to the story. "If you give a correct response it doesn't necessarily mean you're knowledgeable" she says. "You could be accurate because you asked someone else for help or you could be accurate by a complete fluke." Einav and her coauthor, Elizabeth Robinson of Warwick University, wanted to know whether children assessing the reliability of others take into account the reasons for others' accuracy.
For their study, Einav and Robinson used puppets and a teddy bear to test children. A child would hold up a picture of an elephant, cow, or rabbit for each puppet to identify. Both puppets labeled all animals correctly but one puppet always knew the answer without any help, whereas the other puppet always relied on help from Ted. Then, Ted was removed so he couldn't help the puppets anymore and the child was given a picture of an unfamiliar animala mongooseand asked which puppet could tell them what it was.
Three-year-olds were equally likely to choose the puppet who'd known the answers on its own and the puppet that got help from Ted. But four- and five-year-olds were more discriminating: They invested more trust in the puppet whose accuracy reflected independent knowledge rather than being dependent on an external source. "We think it's important that from the age of around four, children are being sophisticated in a way that people hadn't really shown before," Einav says. "They're able to distinguish someone who's truly knowledgeable from someone who's given them a right answer but doesn't necessarily deserve long-term trust." This useful skill allows children to seek out people who are likely to be particularly beneficial for their learning.
Provided by
Association for Psychological Science
-
Preschoolers use statistics to understand others
Aug 17, 2010 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Psychologists say babies know right from wrong even at six months
May 10, 2010 |
not rated yet |
0
-
The good, the bad and the baby (w/ video)
Mar 29, 2011 |
not rated yet |
0
-
A single interaction affects the way a child seeks information, study finds
Sep 01, 2010 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Critical thinking: How do children learn who to trust?
Mar 22, 2011 |
not rated yet |
0
-
Motion perception revisited: High Phi effect challenges established motion perception assumptions
Apr 23, 2013 |
3 / 5 (2) |
2
-
Anything you can do I can do better: Neuromolecular foundations of the superiority illusion (Update)
Apr 02, 2013 |
4.5 / 5 (11) |
5
-
The visual system as economist: Neural resource allocation in visual adaptation
Mar 30, 2013 |
5 / 5 (2) |
9
-
Separate lives: Neuronal and organismal lifespans decoupled
Mar 27, 2013 |
4.9 / 5 (8) |
0
-
Sizing things up: The evolutionary neurobiology of scale invariance
Feb 28, 2013 |
4.8 / 5 (10) |
14
-
Why is zone 1 in liver more prone to ischemic injury?
May 23, 2013
-
How can there be villous adenoma in colon, if there are no villi there
May 22, 2013
-
How can there be a term called "intestinal metaplasia" of stomach
May 21, 2013
-
Pressure-volume curve: Elastic Recoil Pressure don't make sense
May 18, 2013
-
If you became brain-dead, would you want them to pull the plug?
May 17, 2013
-
MRI bill question
May 15, 2013
- More from Physics Forums - Medical Sciences
More news stories
Storm chasers: born to be wild?
(HealthDay)—We've all seen them: the surfers who race to the beach when a hurricane hits, the guy who decides to ride out the storm in his overmatched boat, the tornado chasers who fearlessly steer their ...
Psychology & Psychiatry
May 24, 2013 |
not rated yet |
0
Hormone levels may provide key to understanding psychological disorders in women
Women at a particular stage in their monthly menstrual cycle may be more vulnerable to some of the psychological side-effects associated with stressful experiences, according to a study from UCL.
Psychology & Psychiatry
May 24, 2013 |
4 / 5 (4) |
4
|
Are there atheists in foxholes? Study says they're the minority
Ernie Pyle – an iconic war correspondent in World War II – reportedly said "There are no atheists in foxholes." A new joint study between two brothers at Cornell and Virginia Wesleyan found that only ...
Psychology & Psychiatry
May 24, 2013 |
2.5 / 5 (4) |
2
Breathing exercises help veterans find peace after war, scholar says
(Medical Xpress)—Research by Stanford scholar Emma Seppala at the Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education found that post-traumatic stress disorder decreased in veterans who participated ...
Psychology & Psychiatry
May 24, 2013 |
5 / 5 (1) |
1
Depression raises diabetics' risk of severe low blood sugar episodes
(Medical Xpress)—Patients with diabetes who are depressed are much more likely to develop episodes of dangerously low blood sugars, or hypoglycemia, than are those who are not depressed, a new study has ...
Psychology & Psychiatry
May 24, 2013 |
not rated yet |
0
|
Seniors more likely to crash when driving with pet, study finds
(HealthDay)—Animals make great companions for senior citizens, but elderly people who always drive with a pet in the car are far more likely to crash than those who never drive with a pet, researchers have ...
First drug to improve heart failure mortality in over a decade
Coenzyme Q10 decreases all cause mortality by half, according to the results of a multicentre randomised double blind trial presented today at Heart Failure 2013 congress. It is the first drug to improve heart failure mortality ...
Heart failure accelerates male 'menopause'
Heart failure accelerates the aging process and brings on early andropausal syndrome (AS), according to research presented today at the Heart Failure Congress 2013. AS, also referred to as male 'menopause', was four times ...
Death highest in heart failure patients admitted in January, on Friday, and overnight
Mortality and length of stay are highest in heart failure patients admitted in January, on Friday, and overnight, according to research presented today at the Heart Failure Congress 2013. The analysis of nearly 1 million ...
Feds fight morning-after pill age ruling in NY
(AP)—Department of Justice lawyers have again asked a federal appeals court in New York to delay lifting age restrictions and prescription requirements on an emergency contraceptive popularly known as the morning-after ...
New immune system discovered
(Medical Xpress)—A research team, led by Jeremy Barr, a biology post-doctoral fellow, unveils a new immune system that protects humans and animals from infection.
Aug 18, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
O.k. I'm game. Let me play too:
You got this from earlier studies? Careful now.
Cognitive bias.
The first God for all children are parents. The parents, when the child finally understands their language, talked of other Gods.
In the beginning,
there was l..., le..., len...,leni..., lenin.
(I stutter a lot)
Trust is good, control is better.
Total control relies on nothing. That accuracy is perfect, regardless of reasoning.
Aug 19, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Aug 19, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Dear ToM,
We, my twin and I have decided to part from you. We had long discussions about you in the womb before we were born. We decided for the sake of science - your bread and butter - that we play dumb for you - you needed something to do and you, ToM, were the perfect person to keep yourself busy. So we offered no 'evidence' for you, ToM, at birth.
ToM, you are a dreamer, a theorizer. You simply went ahead and extrapolate our internal mental states and pasted a time table to this to boot. That is inconsiderate, rude and unscientific. Do you remember, ToM? We played peek-a-boo together, A FEW WEEKS AFTER BIRTH. You went ahead anyway, called us deficit(!!!) until we pointed fingers THREE YEARS LATER! We were just an object to you, ToM, until the finger pointing began. Wholly inadequate for you, ToM.
We are tired, ToM, of you taking us to task(s). We now ask you to leave.
Take care
Aug 19, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
This is like pushing salience in the womb. Forget it. You have all been there. And forgotten that salience was not a part of our learning world there. And we learned more there, than at any other time of our lives.
A total rethink of psychiatry, psychology, and neuroscience is in order.
Just as bad as the astrophysical society with black holes and gravitational waves!!!
I going to be sick now, excuse me.
Aug 19, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
RKS are you in love?!?!? You don't need ToM. Take our word for it. ToM is bad for you. Alright. Just don't say we did not warn you.