Humble people are more likely to lend a helping hand, study finds

Humble people are more likely to offer time to someone in need than arrogant people are, according to findings by Baylor University researchers published online in the Journal of Positive Psychology.

"The findings are surprising because in nearly 30 years of research on helping behavior, very few studies have shown any effect of personality variables on helping," said lead author Jordan LaBouff, Ph.D., a lecturer in psychology at the University of Maine, who collaborated on the research while a doctoral candidate at Baylor. "The only other that has shown any effect is , but we found that humility predicted helping over and above that."

In most cases, a person's decision to help someone in need is influenced by temporary personal or situational factors such as , number of , momentary feelings of or a person's own distress, said Wade C. Rowatt, Ph.D., associate professor of psychology and in Baylor's College of Arts & Sciences, who led the study and co-authored the article.

"The research indicates that humility is a positive quality with potential benefits," Rowatt said. "While several factors influence whether people will volunteer to help a fellow human in need, it appears that humble people, on average, are more helpful than individuals who are egotistical or conceited."

The research involved three studies of college students:

In Study 1, participants who reported themselves as humble also generally reported that they were helpful, even when other important personality factors, such as agreeableness, were statistically controlled. Because people can easily under-report or exaggerate their humility to create a desired impression, the subsequent studies used an implicit measure of humility.

In Study 2, students evaluated a recording they were told might be broadcast later on the campus radio station. The recording described a fellow student who had injured a leg and could not attend class regularly. Each participant was asked how many hours over the next three weeks they would be willing to meet with the injured student to provide aid. Humble persons offered more time to help than less humble ones.

In Study 3, both implicit and self-report measures of humility were used. Students were asked to associate as quickly as possible traits that applied to themselves. Among stimulus words in the humility association test were humble, modest, tolerant, down to earth, respectful and open-minded. Stimulus words in the arrogance portion included arrogant, immodest, egotistical and conceited. Again, humility was associated with amount of time offered to help a student in need, especially when pressure to help was low.

"Our discovery here is that the understudied trait of humility predicts helpfulness," Rowatt said. "Important next steps will be to figure out whether humility can be cultivated and if is beneficial in other contexts, such as scientific and medical advancements or leadership development."

More information: www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10… 17439760.2011.626787

Related Stories

Personality affects how likely we are to take our medication

May 10, 2011

The results of a unique study from the University of Gothenburg, Sweden, show that personality has an impact on how likely people are to take their medication. This is the first major study of its kind to be published in ...

Recommended for you

Research shows seven-year-olds can think strategically

14 minutes ago

(Medical Xpress)—A study by Melissa Koenig of the University of Minnesota and colleagues shows that by the time they reach the age of seven, children can think strategically, in an adult manner. The researchers ...

Discovery hints at why stress is more devastating for some

4 hours ago

Some people take stress in stride; others are done in by it. New research at Rockefeller University has identified the molecular mechanisms of this so-called stress gap in mice with very similar genetic backgrounds—a ...

Family dinners reduce effects of cyberbullying in adolescents

16 hours ago

Sharing regular family meals with children may help protect them from the effects of cyberbullying, according to a study by McGill professor Frank Elgar, Institute for Health and Social Policy. Because family meal times represent ...

The Edwardians were also fans of brain training

22 hours ago

Brain-training programmes are all the rage. They are part of a growing digital brain-health industry that earned more than US$1 billion in revenue in 2012 and is estimated to reach US$6 billion by 2020. The extent to which they actually improve brain function re ...

Report advocates improved police training

Aug 29, 2014

A new report released yesterday by the Mental Health Commission of Canada identifies ways to improve the mental health training and education that police personnel receive.

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

freethinking
1.4 / 5 (11) Jan 02, 2012
I've always wondered why our family helps others more than other families do. I had a discussion with a group of people and I said out we are always seems to be around people than need help. Two people said they don't know anyone who needs help, and if I were to classify them as egotistical and conceited.

A question I would have is, do egotistical and conceited not want to help, or are just too blind to see who needs help.
Callippo
3 / 5 (2) Jan 02, 2012
Trivial research is trivial. What else we can expect from underemployment in contemporary science? The research, how humble people are more humble? While the research of many boundary but important psychic phenomena is ignored for decades in similar way, like the mass of photons with relativity.
freethinking
1.3 / 5 (14) Jan 02, 2012
looks like we have a new sockpuppet master:

Fagamemnon, OverweightAnatolian, PetiteAmerican, PaoloITipBasso

Who is your master? I have a few guesses,

Who agrees that those who use sockpuppets to raise or lower scores are scum buckets.
FrankHerbert
3.1 / 5 (17) Jan 02, 2012
The above post should be removed for the following reasons:

Guidelines for posting comments on PhysOrg.com articles:

Stay on topic: Acceptable comments include those that add to the discussion in a meaningful and thought-provoking manner or provide an intelligent counterpoint to our articles.

Keep science: Include references to the published scientific literature to support your statements. Pseudoscience comments (including non-mainstream theories) will be deleted (see pseudoscience).

Do not 'crosspost': Do not keep posting the same message, or very similar messages.

Do not 'feed' the trolls: Do not engage with trolls in the comment threads (see internet troll).

Comments that will be deleted include:
abusive, snarky, obscene, or just plain nasty remarks about anything or anyone;
off topic ramblings, rants, or pointless verbiage;
freethinking
1.7 / 5 (6) Jan 03, 2012
FH sockpuppet master... you've been outed, at least be a little bit cleaver about it! Those that use sockpuppet's to bolster themselves show weak they are.
Isaacsname
not rated yet Jan 08, 2012
....anyway...

There is a fine line here. Offering help when somebody isn't asking is more often than not, _not_ received very warmly.

Many people take offense personally, they feel like it's a statement the person offering help is making about their apparent ineptitude.

There are indirect ways to help people by visual example without even interacting with them. It's a tactic I used to train cooks for years.

Monkey see, monkey do.