Bioethicists contribute to consensus opinion on the responsibility of biobanks

Bioethicists at the Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics are co-authors on a consensus article placing "significant responsibility" on biobanks to report individual research results (IRRs) and incidental findings (IFs) to the contributors of genetic material.

"The should set the rules for the overall process of recognizing (and subsequently analyzing and returning) IFs and IRRs," the authors write in Genetics in Medicine.

Biobanks should define and manage a system by which "findings that are analytically valid, reveal an established and substantial risk of a serious , and are clinically actionable should generally be offered to consenting contributors," the authors write.

Jeffery Kahn, Ph.D., M.P.H, was co-investigator on the study and is Deputy Director for Policy and Administration at the Berman Institute. Co-author Joan Scott, MS, CGC, is a faculty member at the Berman Institute and Executive Director of the National Coalition for Health Professional Education in Genetics. Kahn and Scott were joined by 24 colleagues on the consensus report of a two-year study funded by the National Institutes of Health.

"This discussion of the ethical duty to research patients is extremely important and a preview of the questions we will face as genomic technologies such as whole genome sequencing move from the research setting to clinical care, and patients and providers are faced with an increasing amount of genomic information," Scott says.

More information: Genetics In Medicine: www.nature.com/gim/index.html

Provided by Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Managing incidental findings in human subjects research

Jun 25, 2008

[B]Article offers first major consensus recommendations for IFs[/B] An incidental finding (IF) is a finding concerning an individual research participant that has potential health or reproductive importance, is discovered in ...

Of mice and men: Stem cells and ethical uncertainties

Oct 29, 2009

The recent creation of live mice from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) not only represents a remarkable scientific achievement, but also raises important issues, according to bioethicists at The Johns Hopkins University's ...

Researchers weigh in on ethics of H5N1 research

Feb 09, 2012

(Medical Xpress) -- In a commentary on the biosecurity controversy surrounding publication of bird flu research details, a bioethicist and a vaccine expert at Johns Hopkins reaffirm that "all scientists have an affirmativ ...

Perspective: Policies must keep pace with genetic progress

Jun 19, 2008

Enactment of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) of 2008 is a boon to individual patients and for genetic research, write Kathy Hudson, M.K. Holohan, and Francis Collins in the June 19 issue of the New En ...

Recommended for you

User comments