Concerns about MRSA for expectant mothers may be unfounded

By Craig Boerner
Natalia Jimenez-Truque, MSCI, and Buddy Creech, M.D., MPH, are studying the ramifications of expectant mothers passing MRSA to their children. Credit: Anne Rayner

The need to swab the noses of pregnant women and newborns for the presence of MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) may be unfounded, according to a Vanderbilt study now available online and published in the May issue of Pediatrics.

The study’s senior author, Buddy Creech, M.D., MPH, assistant professor of Pediatrics, said it is often feared that mothers carrying MRSA may risk transmitting an infection to their newborn , but Vanderbilt Pediatric Infectious Diseases researchers found that babies rarely became ill from MRSA infections, despite frequently carrying the germ.

“Describing the timing and mode of transmission is important, since the most critical finding in this research is that babies are very commonly exposed to MRSA in early infancy, often with strains that aren't likely to cause disease,” Creech said.

The study enrolled more than 500 pregnant women in Nashville and Memphis. Nasal and vaginal swabs were collected and tested for the presence of bacteria at regular intervals, including at the time of delivery. Babies were swabbed right after birth and at 2 and 4 months of age.

Results show little vertical transmission of MRSA from mother to child, Creech said, but babies did closely match their mother’s carrier status by 2 months of age. This suggests a mother who carries S. aureus bacteria in her nose will give it to her baby and her baby will become colonized from close contact within six to eight weeks after birth, which is called horizontal transmission.

“Labs were finding a substantial amount of MRSA. Even in our study we found 20 percent of will have it, as will 20 percent of babies at eight weeks,” Creech said. “But there is tremendous anxiety about what that means and, for physicians, what do you do?”

“We don’t want to overreact to carriage when incidence of disease is low. A lot of babies are colonized. A lot. Twenty percent at 2 months of age is the highest rate we’ve ever seen, but in our study only two babies got disease,” Creech said.

Creech says, at this time, the best action when MRSA colonization is detected in a pregnant woman may be no action at all.

The next step in research is to determine if mother-to-child transmission of MRSA in infancy might provide benefits, like greater protection against more serious MRSA illnesses later in life.

The study’s first author is Natalia Jimenez-Truque, MQC, MSCI, Epidemiology graduate student in Pediatric Infectious Diseases.

Provided by Vanderbilt Medical Center

3 /5 (1 vote)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Coffee and tea consumption reduce MRSA risk

Jul 15, 2011

While an apple a day may keep the doctor away, new research published in the Annals of Family Medicine say that hot tea or coffee may keep the methicillin-resistant Staphyloccus aureus, or MRSA, bug away, or at least out of ...

Bed bugs with MRSA superbug superbad news: expert

May 16, 2011

As if the recent resurgence of bed bugs wasn’t bad enough, Canadian researchers have found some of the little blood-sucking critters carrying methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, the potentially deadly superbug k ...

Recommended for you

Ebola virus in Africa outbreak is a new strain

3 hours ago

The Ebola virus that has killed scores of people in Guinea this year is a new strain—evidence that the disease did not spread there from outbreaks in some other African nations, scientists report.

Researchers see hospitalization records as additional tool

3 hours ago

Comparing hospitalization records with data reported to local boards of health presents a more accurate way to monitor how well communities track disease outbreaks, according to a paper published April 16 in the journal PLOS ON ...

User comments