It's genetic: Some smokers have biological resistance to anti-tobacco policies

by Michael Greenwood
It's genetic: Some smokers have biological resistance to anti-tobacco policies

(Medical Xpress)—Despite concerted government efforts to curtail tobacco use, the number of smokers in the United States has remained stable in recent years, rather than declining. The reason: genetics.

New research from the Yale School of Public Health suggests that individuals' genetics play an important role in whether they respond to tobacco-control policies. The study appears online in the journal .

Smoking dropped sharply after the 's landmark report on the dangers of tobacco was published in 1964, but rates have plateaued during the past two decades despite increasingly stringent measures to persuade people to quit. The study found that may help explain why some people respond to anti-smoking inducements, such as higher taxes and the expansion of clean-air laws, and why others do not.

"We found that for people who are genetically predisposed to , higher cigarette taxes were not enough to dissuade them from smoking," said lead researcher Jason M. Fletcher, associate professor in the Department of and Management at the Yale School of Public Health. Fletcher, also a former Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health & Society Scholar, examined the interplay between state-level tobacco taxation and a nicotinic receptor gene in a cross-section of U.S. adults.

The "gene-policy interaction" study, the first of its kind, found that variations in the nicotine receptor were linked to the influence of higher taxes on multiple measures of tobacco use. Individuals with a specific genetic variant decreased their tobacco use by nearly 30 percent when facing high tobacco taxes, while individuals with an alternative genetic variant had no response.

"This study is an important first step in considering how to further reduce adult smoking rates," said Fletcher. "We need to understand why existing policies do not work for everyone so that we can develop more effective approaches."

The gap in the effectiveness of tobacco-control policies remains poorly understood. The findings suggest that strategies that do not rely on financial or social consequences may be needed to persuade a still-significant segment of the population to quit, notes Fletcher.

Tobacco use remains the leading cause of preventable death in the United States, and is responsible for more than 400,000 deaths each year, according to the study. taxation, meanwhile, has been credited with helping to reduce use by more than 50 percent since the Surgeon General's report.

More information: dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050576

Related Stories

Anti-smoking policies for adults also reduce kids' smoking

Jun 20, 2011

When governments use comprehensive, well-funded tobacco control programs to reduce adult smoking, they also reduce smoking among adolescents. This bonus effect is an important factor to consider as policymakers face pressure ...

WHO: Smoking kills 5 million every year

Dec 09, 2009

(AP) -- Tobacco use kills at least 5 million people every year, a figure that could rise if countries don't take stronger measures to combat smoking, the World Health Organization said Wednesday.

Recommended for you

Refining the language for chromosomes

Apr 17, 2014

When talking about genetic abnormalities at the DNA level that occur when chromosomes swap, delete or add parts, there is an evolving communication gap both in the science and medical worlds, leading to inconsistencies in ...

Down's chromosome cause genome-wide disruption

Apr 16, 2014

The extra copy of Chromosome 21 that causes Down's syndrome throws a spanner into the workings of all the other chromosomes as well, said a study published Wednesday that surprised its authors.

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

BSD
not rated yet Dec 06, 2012
Here in Australia, I advocate the advertising of cigarettes on all media. Then, heavily tax the advertising, tax cigarettes to make them about ten dollars per unit. Fine smokers five thousand dollars for smoking in public or outside of their house, exclude them from all free health care that their taxes will pay for and ban them from medical transplants.

It's only fair that smokers be treated like social scum. BTW I don't care if they die either, I just want their money for revenue. There will always be more idiot smokers to pay for the rest of us.