(HealthDay)—Having pots of money doesn't necessarily make you happy, study after study has found. But giving away money—even if you're not rich—is likely to make you feel wealthier, and thus happier, new research contends.
It sounds counterintuitive, but it's not, said study author Michael Norton, an associate professor of marketing at Harvard Business School, who presented his findings from a series of new studies Saturday at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology in New Orleans.
"One of the ways people signal they are wealthy is to give money away," Norton said. So he did the studies to find out what happens when those who aren't rich give money away.
Turns out, giving away money increases what experts call feelings of "subjective wealth," or how well off you feel. The thinking, said Norton, goes something like this: "If I have so much money that I can give it away, I may not be so bad off."
"We suggest that acts of generosity can also signal wealth to the givers themselves, making them feel subjectively wealthier even as money leaves their pockets," he and his colleagues wrote.
The donations also seem to increase the donor's sense of power, according to Norton, and that may lead them to feel happier, because the donations "fulfill a deeper desire to signal wealth."
Norton didn't ask people in this new research about pleasure they felt in helping others by giving money. "But some of our earlier research suggests that people do, in fact, glean happiness from being pro-social," he said.
For one study, Norton used data from a Gallup World Poll. Participants were asked to report how they had spent a windfall of money in the past year. They were asked what percent they gave to charity and how they felt about their financial situation.
In all, 559 of the more than 2,000 people surveyed had received a windfall. After excluding three "outliers" who received more than $1 million, the average windfall amount was $1,500. Of those, 99 said they donated about 3 percent of the money to charity.
Norton asked questions to assess subjective wealth. Even when he compensated for income, donations predicted better feelings of subjective wealth.
Giving $500, he calculated, has the same effect on feelings of subjective wealth as earning an extra $10,000 in income.
In related research, Norton found that people who volunteer their time to help sick children or for other charitable pursuits feel they have more time than those who don't volunteer. The thinking, he suspects, is that if they have time to give away, they must have plenty of time.
"To me this is interesting because it is counterintuitive," said James Maddux, professor emeritus in the department of psychology at George Mason University.
The driving force for feeling wealthier after donating, Maddux agreed, is the perception of wealth. "I think it's the sense that if I have enough money to afford to give some away, I must be better off than I thought I was," he said.
"People may feel more satisfied with life when they feel wealthier," he added.
The new research also ties in to other studies finding that people are always measuring themselves against others, Maddux said. "What seems to matter psychologically to people is not objectively what money they have—but what they have, what they own, compared to other people."
Data and conclusions from the studies should be viewed as preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Explore further:
Surprising connections between our well-being and giving, getting, and gratitude
More information: To learn more about money and happiness, visit the American Psychological Association.

EBENEZR
not rated yet Jan 21, 2013g9_
not rated yet Jan 21, 2013treii28
3 / 5 (2) Jan 21, 2013If you hold irrational ideas about what makes you 'good' or what makes you have self-worth, then giving away your money will make you 'feel' better. And of course feelings are what is most important, to hell with that 'reality' crap right? Notions of altruistic 'duty-to-others' and self-sacrificing nonsense have been proliferated by our society for a long long time. (this is mostly because without such notions being seen as virtuous, others can't control you or otherwise get you to obey)
If you properly define what constitutes value, moral and ethical behavior and self-esteem, it is not necessary to give away all you have to 'feel' whole again. You can then be charitable when it is actually worthwhile to be such.
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (2) Jan 21, 2013Seeing as there are plenty of people who do have a lot - but still are unhappy or strive maniacally for more - there definitely are people whose intuition fails them in this.
VendicarD
3.4 / 5 (5) Jan 21, 2013Those who fixate on it are invariably shallow, unhappy and unfulfilled.
Argiod
3.7 / 5 (3) Jan 21, 2013(tongue firmly in cheek; but never in check)
zaxxon451
1 / 5 (1) Jan 22, 2013"Philanthropy is commendable, but it must not cause the philanthropist to overlook the circumstances of economic injustice which make philanthropy necessary." -- Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
thingumbobesquire
1 / 5 (1) Jan 22, 2013Eikka
not rated yet Jan 22, 2013Of course it makes you happy. How else do you solve the stinging cognitive dissonance that you just tossed away $500 even though you yoursef are poor?
The less you have, the better you have to justify your spending - but when you have no justification you have to make some sort of excuse to avoid the painful realization that you just did something very dumb. So you become happy, or you invent a temporary lie that you can afford to give away $500 because you're wealthy.
These feelings are post-hoc reactions to the contradiction of your irrational actions and your self-image of being a rational wise person who is in control of themselves. You become happy to think that you did it to become happy.
It's like laughter after spinning your car on ice at 70 mph and somehow ending back on the road the right way around. If you didn't laugh, you'd be crying
triplehelix
1 / 5 (1) Jan 22, 2013Bullshit.
Everytime I get a payrise I smile with glee. Everytime some charity mugger tries to get money off me I end up in a foul mood all day.
Just sounds like propaganda to me. Governments want people to spend money to kickstart the markets again, but people are saving instead. So lo and behold, a massive turnout of "scientific" papers appear stating how throwing money away makes you feel good and is the better option.
I know very few depressed rich people. I have seen plenty of very depressed and successful suidical people due to being poor.
As I stated before, utter bullshit. This may be true of people who have considerable disposable incomes, where $10k is probably just a 1% payrise, but for someone who earns $1k a month, giving $500 away would put me on the dark cold streets, I would not be happy.
libertus
not rated yet Jan 22, 2013headrushed
not rated yet Jan 22, 2013The claims made in this study/article are utterly ridiculous as so many others have pointed out. Feeling wealthier doesn't mean anything and giving away money is a horrible set up for bad credit and terrible debt.
I am an animal advocate, there are so many shelters and animal care facilities that I could give all my money away to but I don't because I simply can't afford it. I do other things to do my part to alleviate the suffering of animals. It never seems like enough because the needs are so great in our world but it means something to each animal that I can help. Throwing money at things doesn't actually solve problems especially if I'm throwing money I don't really have to give.
That really is a bullshit study.
triplehelix
not rated yet Jan 23, 2013Vincas
5 / 5 (5) Feb 01, 2013