Big gap looms for poor in Obama health care law

This handout photo provided by the Brookings Institution, taken Tuesday, June 25, 2013, shows Health and Human Services Director of the Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight Gary Cohen speaking at the Institution in Washington. _ Nearly 2 in 3 uninsured low-income people who would qualify for subsidized coverage under President Barack Obama's health care law may be out of luck next year because their states have not expanded Medicaid. An Associated Press analysis of figures from the Urban Institute finds a huge coverage gap developing, with 9.7 million out of 15 million potentially eligible low-income adults living in states that are refusing the expansion or still are undecided with time running short. (AP Photo/Brookings Institution, Paul Morigi)

(AP)—President Barack Obama's historic promise of health insurance for nearly all U.S. residents looks unlikely to be fulfilled as envisioned—with nearly two in three uninsured low-income people who would qualify losing out—because many states are refusing to go along.

An Associated Press analysis of figures from the Urban Institute finds a big coverage gap developing, with 9.7 million out of 15 million potentially eligible adults living in that are refusing the expansion of the Medicaid program for the poor, or are still undecided.

That a majority of the neediest people who could be helped by the country's sweeping health care overhaul may remain uninsured is a predicament seemingly unforeseen by Obama and fellow Democrats in Congress who designed a dramatic extension of the net.

It's the direct consequence of last summer's Supreme Court decision on the landmark "Obamacare" plan that gave states the right to opt out of the Medicaid expansion, combined with resistance to the law from many opposition Republican state lawmakers.

Expanding Medicaid is essential to Obama's two-part strategy for covering the uninsured.

Starting next year, middle-class people without coverage through their jobs will be able to get tax credits to help them buy . But the law calls for low-income people to enroll in Medicaid, expanded to accommodate a largely excluded group: adults with no children at home.

Expanded Medicaid would cover about half of the 25 million to 30 million people who could be helped by the law. Medicaid already covers more than 60 million people, including many elderly nursing , severely and many low-income children and their mothers.

Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia have decided to accept the expansion, which is fully financed by Washington for the first three years. The AP's check of the states finds 18 not expanding and nine where the outcome is still undecided.

The majority of low-income Americans newly eligible for Medicaid live in well-populated states such as Texas, Florida and Georgia, where political opposition remains formidable.

Many Republican state lawmakers believe Medicaid has too many problems already. Some believe is an individual responsibility, not a government obligation.

Republican health policy expert Gail Wilensky said she did not expect so many states to turn down the Medicaid expansion. While critical of some features of the Affordable Care Act, Wilensky believes it's important for the U.S. to get uninsured people covered.

"This is depriving the poorest of their citizens of an important benefit," said Wilensky, who ran Medicare and Medicaid during the administration of President George H.W. Bush.

As originally designed, the Medicaid expansion was supposed to cover households making up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level, about $15,860 for an individual or $32,500 for a family of four. Under the law, Medicaid is the only coverage option for people below the poverty line, $11,490 for an individual, or $23,550 for a family of four.

"This decision will have very real human costs for the adults who are going to remain uninsured and their families," said Genevieve Kenney, co-director of the Urban Institute's health policy center. "It seriously undermines the ability of the Affordable Care Act to substantially reduce the number of uninsured in this country, at least at the beginning."

Related Stories

Feds rule on health care law's Medicaid expansion

date Dec 10, 2012

(AP)—The Obama administration says Republican-led states must commit to fully expanding their Medicaid programs to take advantage of generous funding in the federal health care law.

Recommended for you

Noise from fireworks threatens young ears

date 12 hours ago

(HealthDay)—The Fourth of July weekend is a time for celebrations and beautiful fireworks displays. But, parents do need to take steps to protect their children's ears from loud fireworks, a hearing expert ...

Many new teen drivers 'crash' in simulated driving task

date 12 hours ago

(HealthDay)—Around four in 10 newly licensed teen drivers "crashed" in a simulated driving test, suggesting that many adolescents lack the skills they need to stay safe on the road, according to a new study.

Insurer Aetna to buy Humana in $35B deal

date 13 hours ago

Aetna will spend about $35 billion to buy rival Humana and become the latest health insurer bulking up on government business as the industry adjusts to the federal health care overhaul.

Feeling impulsive or frustrated? Take a nap

date 15 hours ago

Taking a nap may be an effective strategy to counteract impulsive behavior and to boost tolerance for frustration, according to a University of Michigan study.

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Jul 01, 2013
I can no longer afford catastrophic care insurance ($5000 deductible) because of this asinine law. The price has tripled in the past 2 years and is now nearly $500 a month.

Will the people who voted for President Bystander please rise so that you might be roundly ridiculed.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.