Less can be more when removing lymph nodes during breast cancer surgery

A conservative approach to removing lymph nodes is associated with less harm for breast cancer patients and often yields the same results as more radical procedures, researchers at UT Southwestern Medical Center have found.

In the Oct. 2 edition of the Journal of the American Medical Association, lead author Dr. Roshni Rao, associate professor of surgery at UT Southwestern, and other investigators from the Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center reviewed studies on patient outcomes of women who had received various forms of surgical treatment, ranging from removal of one lymph node to prevent the spread of to removing the entire network of lymph nodes spanning the armpits.

Until recently, clinical practice guidelines advised complete axillary node dissection – removal of all 20-30 axillary nodes – if a woman's sentinel was positive. The sentinel node is generally the first node to which cancer cells will spread from a primary tumor. A positive indicates the tumor has metastasized and can be used to determine the stage of the cancer. Axillary lymph nodes are distributed at the edge of the chest muscles and into the armpits and lower neck.

For women with no suspicious axillary nodes who undergo breast-conserving therapy, there is little evidence of benefit in doing a complete axillary node dissection compared with alone, the reviewers reported. Breast conserving therapy is defined as partial mastectomy followed by whole breast radiation.

"In the past, axillary nodal status was a critical factor considered in therapy decisions," said Dr. Rao, a breast cancer surgeon. "With the validation of biopsy, the same staging information can be obtained with less morbidity and risk to the patient. And now that decisions regarding chemotherapy are often guided by molecular tumor profiling in an era of personalized medicine, there are other avenues to explore beyond aggressive surgeries."

To assess the effect of the guidelines, Dr. Rao and her colleagues reviewed the risks and benefits of sentinel node biopsy as compared with complete axillary node dissection in previous published research. They also compared these procedures with nonsurgical interventions (i.e., additional radiation) in women with breast cancer who do not have palpable or ultrasound evidence that their cancer has spread to the axillary nodes.

They also reviewed the rate of recurrence of axillary node metastases, mortality, morbidity, and complications associated with each intervention, using online medical databases. In all, more than 1,000 results were examined from 17 studies to write the JAMA review.

Avoiding axillary surgery if possible is important, Dr. Rao said, because it can cause shoulder and arm symptoms including lymphedema, severe pain or numbness, and reduced range of motion, and it generally involves longer stays in the hospital, as opposed to sentinel node surgery.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Discovery could lead to new cancer treatment

Aug 29, 2014

A team of scientists from the University of Colorado School of Medicine has reported the breakthrough discovery of a process to expand production of stem cells used to treat cancer patients. These findings could have implications ...

Is the HPV vaccine necessary?

Aug 29, 2014

As the school year starts in full swing many parents wonder if their child should receive the HPV vaccine, which is recommended for girls ages 11-26 and boys 11-21. There are a lot of questions and controversy around this ...

User comments