Experts call for global overhaul of industrial chemical regulations

In a Review published in The Lancet Neurology, two of the world's leading experts on the link between environment and children's health are sounding the alarm on the dangers of industrial chemicals.

They are calling on countries to transform their risk-assessment procedures in order to protect children from everyday toxins that may be causing a global "silent epidemic" of brain development disorders.

Findings from the Review indicate that in the past 7 years, the number of recognised chemical causes of neurodevelopmental disorders has doubled from six to 12, while the list of chemicals that are known to damage the human brain, but are not regulated to protect children's health, has also expanded from 202 to 214. These hazardous chemicals are found in everyday items such as clothing, furniture, and toys.

"Current chemical regulations are woefully inadequate to safeguard children whose developing brains are uniquely vulnerable to toxic chemicals in the environment", explains Dr Philippe Grandjean from Harvard School of Public Health in Boston. "Until a legal requirement is introduced for manufacturers to prove that all existing and all new chemicals are non-toxic before they enter the marketplace, along the lines of the European Union's reformed chemicals law REACH, we are facing a pandemic of neurodevelopmental toxicity."

Neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism, attention deficit disorder (ADHD), dyslexia, and cerebral palsy affect one in six children worldwide. Growing evidence strongly links childhood exposures to such as mercury, lead, and certain solvents and pesticides to higher rates of these and suggests that more stringent controls could generate billions of dollars in savings. The estimated yearly costs of in the USA, for example, are about US$50 billion, and the annual costs of methylmercury toxicity are roughly US$5 billion.

Worryingly, say Grandjean and co-author Dr Philip Landrigan from Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York, this might only be the tip of the iceberg: "The vast majority of the more than 80 000 industrial chemicals in widespread use in the USA have never been tested for their toxic effects on the developing foetus or child. Exposure to these chemicals during early development can cause brain injury at levels much lower than those affecting adults, and the real impact on children's health is just beginning to be uncovered."

The two main obstacles impeding efforts to restrict chemicals that threaten children's health are the large gaps in testing chemicals for neurodevelopmental toxicity and the huge amount of proof required before regulation is enacted.

"The only way to reduce toxic contamination is to ensure mandatory developmental neurotoxicity testing of existing and before they come into the marketplace", says Landrigan. "Such a precautionary approach would mean that early indications of a potentially serious toxic effect would lead to strong regulations, which could be relaxed should subsequent evidence show less harm."

The authors propose a new international prevention strategy that would put the onus on chemical producers instead of government to demonstrate that their products are low risk using a similar testing process to pharmaceuticals, and a new international regulatory agency to coordinate and accelerate these measures.

They conclude, "The total number of neurotoxic substances now recognised almost certainly represents an underestimate of the true number of developmental neurotoxicants that have been released into the global environment. Our very great concern is that children worldwide are being exposed to unrecognised toxic chemicals that are silently eroding intelligence, disrupting behaviours, truncating future achievements, and damaging societies, perhaps most seriously in developing countries."

More information: "Neurobehavioural effects of developmental toxicity," Philippe Grandjean, Philip J. Landrigan, Lancet Neurology, online February 15, 2014. www.thelancet.com/journals/lan… (13)70278-3/abstract

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Methylmercury warning

Oct 28, 2008

Recent studies hint that exposure to the toxic chemicals, such as methylmercury can cause harm at levels previously considered safe. A new analysis of the epidemiological evidence in the International Journal of Environment an ...

Predicting health risks of everyday chemicals

Oct 16, 2013

Concern over the safety of everyday household products, such as baby bottles and soaps, has spurred a wide-ranging research effort into predicting the health risks of tens of thousands of chemicals. That's the topic of the ...

Recommended for you

Emotional adjustment following traumatic brain injury

Oct 24, 2014

Life after a traumatic brain injury resulting from a car accident, a bad fall or a neurodegenerative disease changes a person forever. But the injury doesn't solely affect the survivor – the lives of their spouse or partner ...

New ALS associated gene identified using innovative strategy

Oct 22, 2014

Using an innovative exome sequencing strategy, a team of international scientists led by John Landers, PhD, at the University of Massachusetts Medical School has shown that TUBA4A, the gene encoding the Tubulin Alpha 4A protein, ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

The Shootist
1 / 5 (1) Feb 14, 2014
There is no global government. And you better pray to whatever you hold holy that there never is.
Anonym
not rated yet Feb 15, 2014
Interesting that this article fails to mention the scientists also cited sodium fluoride, the supposed cavity-fighting ingredient in toothpaste, as one of the 12 toxic chemicals. What's up with that, MedExpress?