Gamblers are greedy bird-brains, research finds

A pigeon participating in a test to find out how they make risky decisions. Credit: University of Warwick

Gamblers show the same tendencies as pigeons when they make risky decisions, new research has shown.

Researchers, led by Dr Elliot Ludvig of the University of Warwick's Department of Psychology, conducted tests that found that both gamblers and were 35% more likely to gamble for high-value than low-value rewards.

Published in Biology Letters, the researchers argue that the test results show the important role that memories of previous biggest wins and losses play when we make risky gambling decisions.

"Both humans and pigeons were shown to be less risk averse for high rewards then they were for low rewards and this is linked to our past memories and experiences of making " says Dr Ludvig.

"When people gamble, they often rely on past experiences with risk and rewards to make decisions". Dr Ludvig argues. "What we found in this study is that both pigeons used these past experiences in very similar ways to guide their future gambling decisions - Any big wins we've had in the past are memorable and stand-out when we are making our decision to gamble again".

Despite humans having a greater mental capacity than pigeons, Dr Ludvig argues: "humans and pigeons react in similar ways when faced with risky decisions because equivalent mental processes are driving their behaviour. Humans and pigeons are equally influenced by the biggest wins and losses that they have previously encountered".

Commenting on potential explanations of the close correlation between the species' test results Dr Ludvig said: "Birds are distantly related to humans, yet we still share the same basic that drives risk-taking. This may be due to a shared common ancestry or similar evolutionary pressures".

In the tests individual humans or pigeons learned about four options: two that led to high-value rewards and two that led to low-value rewards, with the humans being rewarded with points and the pigeons with food. For each reward level, high or low, one safe option resulted in a guaranteed fixed reward, and one risky option yielded a 50/50 chance of a better or worse .

More information: Reward context determines risky choice in pigeons and humans, rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.or… .1098/rsbl.2014.0451

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Study shows pigeons like to gamble

Oct 14, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- A new study of pigeons shows that, like human gamblers, they love to gamble on the off chance they will win big rather than taking a smaller, but more certain payout.

Landscape complexity affects pigeons' navigation

Feb 04, 2014

(Phys.org) —Homing pigeons' ability to learn and remember routes depends on the complexity of the landscape below. Hedges and boundaries between urban and rural areas provide ideal landmarks for navigation.

Pigeons never forget a face

Jul 03, 2011

New research has shown that feral, untrained pigeons can recognise individual people and are not fooled by a change of clothes.

Like monkeys, pigeons can put numbers in order

Dec 22, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Pigeons are on par with primates in their numerical abilities, according to new University of Otago research appearing in the leading international journal Science.

Recommended for you

Intervention program helps prevent high-school dropouts

Oct 24, 2014

New research findings from a team of prevention scientists at Arizona State University demonstrates that a family-focused intervention program for middle-school Mexican American children leads to fewer drop-out rates and ...

Bilingualism over the lifespan

Oct 24, 2014

It's a scene that plays out every day in Montreal. On the bus, in schools, in the office and at home, conversations weave seamlessly back and forth between French and English, or one of the many other languages represented ...

User comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

RobertKarlStonjek
1 / 5 (1) Aug 28, 2014
"Birds are distantly related to humans,"

No they are not. The last common ancestor between birds and humans pre-dates the existence of all birds and mammals.

The sex chromosomes have evolved independently (female birds have the analogue of X and Y and not the males as in mammals) and birds have no neocortex. A telencephalon evolved independently in birds.

This places the last common ancestor in pre-dinosaur reptiles. That makes humans more closely related to snakes than birds...
RobertKarlStonjek
1 / 5 (1) Aug 30, 2014
Whoever scored me at 1/5 should open their biology book and look up the evolution of birds and mammals.