Forget the Sprays: Roaches and Their Allergens Reduced in Schools Using IPM

May 5, 2009,

( -- A North Carolina State University study shows that using integrated pest management (IPM) to control pests in public schools - monitoring closely for signs of pests and then utilizing baits and traps in areas where pests are located - reduces pests and their allergens more effectively than the conventional method of spraying pesticides on a predetermined schedule, whether there are cockroaches present or not.

IPM dramatically controls German cockroaches - common school pests - and reduces their allergens, resulting in a healthier environment for students, teachers and staff. Cockroach allergens are associated with allergies and problems, particularly among inner-city children.

A study showing the results of tests comparing the two methods in several North Carolina schools appears in the May issue of the Journal of Medical Entomology.

The results are good news for the 70 North Carolina school districts that have already converted - or are currently converting - to IPM, say Dr. Godfrey Nalyanya, extension specialist in entomology, and Dr. Coby Schal, Blanton J. Whitmire Distinguished Professor of Entomology, two of the NC State researchers involved in the study. It's also good news for schools that haven't made the switch.

"North Carolina schools are mandated to convert to IPM by 2011, so these findings give credibility that IPM has superior and longer-lasting results than pesticide use alone," Nalyanya says.

The study examined the number of cockroaches caught in traps, as well as the concentrations of cockroach allergens in two school districts using the conventional method and one school district using IPM. Schools using IPM had no cockroaches caught in traps, and much
lower concentrations of cockroach Bla g 1 - the most common cockroach allergen - than schools using conventional pest control.

The study was so convincing that the two school districts using conventional pest control quickly made the switch to IPM, Nalyanya says.

IPM has been used in agricultural settings for many years, but is just starting to be used more heavily in buildings or structures, the researchers say.

While this study and others conducted by NC State scientists show that IPM is more effective and ecologically superior to conventional pest control methods, Nalyanya and Schal say that there's long-term economic benefit as well. Setting up the IPM infrastructure and changing existing contracts with control providers takes time and money, but the results are worth it.

"The monetary costs for IPM might be higher initially, but it pays for itself down the road and provides a healthier school environment," Nalyanya says.

Provided by North Carolina State University (news : web)

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Women run faster after taking newly developed supplement, study finds

January 19, 2018
A new study found that women who took a specially prepared blend of minerals and nutrients for a month saw their 3-mile run times drop by almost a minute.

Americans are getting more sleep

January 19, 2018
Although more than one in three Americans still don't get enough sleep, a new analysis shows first signs of success in the fight for more shut eye. According to data from 181,335 respondents aged 15 and older who participated ...

Wine is good for you—to a point

January 18, 2018
The Mediterranean diet has become synonymous with healthy eating, but there's one thing in it that stands out: It's cool to drink wine.

Sleep better, lose weight?

January 17, 2018
(HealthDay)—Sleeplessness could cost you when it's time to stand on your bathroom scale, a new British study suggests.

Who uses phone apps to track sleep habits? Mostly the healthy and wealthy in US

January 16, 2018
The profile of most Americans who use popular mobile phone apps that track sleep habits is that they are relatively affluent, claim to eat well, and say they are in good health, even if some of them tend to smoke.

Improvements in mortality rates are slowed by rise in obesity in the United States

January 15, 2018
With countless medical advances and efforts to curb smoking, one might expect that life expectancy in the United States would improve. Yet according to recent studies, there's been a reduction in the rate of improvement in ...


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.