Scientists create army of tumor-fighting immune cells and watch as they attack cancer

July 12, 2010, University of California - Los Angeles

Researchers at UCLA's Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center created a large, well armed battalion of tumor-seeking immune system cells and watched, in real time using Positron Emission Tomography (PET), as the special forces traveled throughout the body to locate and attack dangerous melanomas.

The gene therapy work, done with melanomas grown in mice, employed a crippled HIV-like virus to serve as a vehicle to arm the lymphocytes with T , which caused the lymphocytes to become specific killers of . A reporter gene, which glows "hot" during PET scanning, also was inserted into the cells so researchers could track the genetically engineered lymphocytes after they were injected into the blood stream, made their way to the lungs and lymph nodes and then specifically homed in on the tumors wherever they were located within the body.

"We're trying to genetically engineer the immune system to become a cancer killer and then image how the immune system operates at the same time," said Dr. Antoni Ribas, an associate professor of hematology/oncology, a researcher at UCLA's Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and the senior author of the study. "We knew this approach of arming the lymphocytes with T cell receptors showed significant anti-tumor activity based on studies in humans. Now, by tracking the immune system's reaction to cancer and imaging it in real time, we can project how the same process that succeeded in mice might behave in people."

The study is published July 12, 2010 in the early online edition of the journal .

"The novelty of our work is that we were able to pack together the cancer specific and the PET reporter genes in a single vector and use it in mice with an intact immune system that closely resembles what we would see in real patients," said Dr. Richard Koya, an assistant professor of at UCLA's David Geffen School of Medicine and first author of the study. "We were also gladly surprised to see the targeted tumors literally melt away and disappear, underscoring the power of the combined approach of immune and gene therapy to control cancer."

The immune system generally does not recognize cancer cells in the body as enemies. The insertion of the antigen-specific T cell receptors - engineered to seek out a tumor antigen on the surface of the melanoma cells - in effect uncloaks the malignant cells, revealing them as deadly invaders that must be sought out and killed.

By imaging the genetically engineered T cells as they seek out and attack the cancer, the scientists can closely examine the processes of the immune system as it fights malignancies , which could then result in better monitoring response to therapy in melanoma patients.

In this study, the cells were injected into the bloodstreams of the mice and they had found and begun to fight the melanoma within two to three days. The mice were imaged periodically for 10 days to ensure the lymphocytes were indeed killing the cancer. The process to find and kill the malignant cells could take longer in people, Ribas said.

If a patient's tumor did not respond well to the administration of the genetically engineered T cells, scientists could determine by PET scanning whether the cells had not successfully made it to the tumor site or, if they did arrive, whether or not they functioned as expected. Monitoring the immune response also could provide clues on ways to better engineer the lymphocytes to more effectively enter and attack the tumors.

In this study, about one million genetically engineered lymphocytes were created and injected into a mouse. In humans, the number of tumor-seeking cells needed to fight the cancer is about one billion, Ribas said.

Ribas and his team are working now on creating a vector, or vehicle, to insert the T cell receptors and reporter gene into the lymphocytes in a way that is safe to use in humans. If all goes well, human studies of the process could begin in about a year, Ribas said.

Related Stories

Recommended for you

A small, daily dose of Viagra may reduce colorectal cancer risk

March 19, 2018
A small, daily dose of Viagra significantly reduces colorectal cancer risk in an animal model that is genetically predetermined to have the third leading cause of cancer death, scientists report.

Researchers create a drug to extend the lives of men with prostate cancer

March 16, 2018
Fifteen years ago, Michael Jung was already an eminent scientist when his wife asked him a question that would change his career, and extend the lives of many men with a particularly lethal form of prostate cancer.

Machine-learning algorithm used to identify specific types of brain tumors

March 15, 2018
An international team of researchers has used methylation fingerprinting data as input to a machine-learning algorithm to identify different types of brain tumors. In their paper published in the journal Nature, the team ...

Higher doses of radiation don't improve survival in prostate cancer

March 15, 2018
A new study shows that higher doses of radiation do not improve survival for many patients with prostate cancer, compared with the standard radiation treatment. The analysis, which included 104 radiation therapy oncology ...

Joint supplement speeds melanoma cell growth

March 15, 2018
Chondroitin sulfate, a dietary supplement taken to strengthen joints, can speed the growth of a type of melanoma, according to experiments conducted in cell culture and mouse models.

Improved capture of cancer cells in blood could help track disease

March 15, 2018
Tumor cells circulating throughout the body in blood vessels have long been feared as harbingers of metastasizing cancer - even though most free-floating cancer cells will not go on to establish a new tumor.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (3) Jul 12, 2010
Well done! independant confirmation of the Marshall Protocol in action.
The A.R.F is now in it's eighth year of using gene therapy to target cancer and other autoimmune diseases by stimulating T cells.
More info at
5 / 5 (2) Jul 13, 2010
Cancer is not an autoimmune disease.
1 / 5 (3) Jul 13, 2010
Read your article again, Cancer is indeed a symptom of autoimmune disease and does respond to autoimmune therapy.
5 / 5 (3) Jul 13, 2010
Cancer is a wide group of neoplastic diseases completely different to autoimmune disease. You have no idea what you are talking about and the site you are advertising is a textbook example of quack medicine. Go away.
1 / 5 (3) Jul 13, 2010
Your medicine is still in the 60's!
You sound like an old doctor trying to hold onto patients when a new doctor comes to town.
Do try to keep up with the latest in medicine!
I am a survivor of autoimmune disease, including cancer and speaking from personal experience.
If I was still on conventional therapy I would indeed have "gone away" as in long dead!
In medicine, especially cancer, you either move forward with technology or die.
Make your choice...
5 / 5 (2) Jul 13, 2010
Including cancer??? I think you might want to read a pathology textbook before you talk about your experiences so you don't immediately come across as a moron. The only reason your website likes to throw everything into one basket is so it can claim that it's snake oil is a cure to all of these things that "conventional medicine" can't treat. Even cancers are not alike, some are extremely treatable while others (see melanoma above) are not.

It's a scam designed to prey on the vulnerable and desperate who are suffering from diseases that unfortunately can't be treated. Research such as the story above is an example of what real medicine is doing. They are working on it. The rest is just con artists peddling false hope.
1 / 5 (3) Jul 14, 2010
Sounds like you have made your choice...
I am alive and recovering ONLY because of Marshall.
Perhaps you had better throw your old pathology textbook away as it is clearly out of date!
If you are not prepared to open your mind to new science then you are wasting your time on Physorg.
By the way, in medicine all cancers are different, but in biomedical engineering they can be treated together since they are all anaerobic and iron dependent.
Did you know that?
Here is another website you can throw abuse at!
And just in case you wonder where it came from...
You just can't help some people.
5 / 5 (2) Jul 14, 2010
Since there are no randomised controlled trials or any evidence for that matter supporting this so-called treatment the only assumption I am left with is that you are either lying or basing your passionate but misguided posts on personal anecdotes. There are a lot of fallacies that make people believe this such as correlation/causation and wishful thinking combined with regression towards the mean and the placebo effect. If you were/are actually sick I hope that you are not refusing conventional evidence based treatment in favour of such nonsense, there are plenty of people who have died doing this.

So far you have mentioned no empirical evidence and only a handful of biomedical facts, most of which have been wrong. Cancer is anaerobic, seriously? Gee that must be why it recruits its own blood supply. Blood carries oxygen away, right?
5 / 5 (3) Jul 14, 2010
By the way, in medicine all cancers are different, but in biomedical engineering they can be treated together since they are all anaerobic and iron dependent.
Did you know that?
If cancer was anaerobic you probably wouldn't see lung cancer as a common fatal cancer. You certainly wouldn't see skin cancer as one of the most common cancers.
1 / 5 (3) Jul 14, 2010
People, I am a survivor not a teacher!
All the info posted is public domaine and can be verified directly if you take the trouble.
I use the word "aerobic" to mean low oxygen rather than low air pressure!
One of the common therapies after chemo has failed is Hyperbaric, ask your doctor what that is!
Read Artbiomedical's website again and you will understand the involvement with oxygen, both google and wiki can confirm this from a host of sources!
As for MP, there are now more than 10,000 of us and west China hospital is currently conducting clinical trials.
Are we all delusional?
Have a look at statistics for cancer survival on conventional therapy rather than taking peoples word that it will be O.K., you might just change your mind.
5 / 5 (1) Jul 15, 2010
I had a read, it's nonsense. Taking all those antibiotics at once will not do a thing for cancer and would probably give a lot of people pseudomembranous colitis. It actually sounds like an experiment to breed new superbugs. 3-5 years!? Seriously??

The whole thing sounds like it was written by someone who knew nothing about medicine, for people who know nothing about medicine. I've heard of this kind of thing before. The founder had sarcoidosis.

'Doctors don't seem to help, not because they can't, they're just useless. I know, I'll whip up a cure with whatever's in my medicine cabinet. Wow, it seemed to go away after 6 months. With my sample size of one, I now proclaim I have the cure to all diseases! Please donate generously as I need the cash - you see I have strong evidence that a cocktail of multiple expensive drugs taken over several years is a miracle cure. As such the drug companies show no interest at all.'
5 / 5 (2) Jul 15, 2010
I use the word "aerobic" to mean low oxygen rather than low air pressure!
One of the common therapies after chemo has failed is Hyperbaric, ask your doctor what that is!

Awfully scientific of you to jsut randomly change established definitions.

This sounds more and more like creationist style snake oil science.
1 / 5 (2) Jul 15, 2010
Like I said, you have made your choice...

Typo, I ment anaerobic, but stick around anyway, the future is still unfolding.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.