Spanish oil spill workers suffered chromosome damage: study

August 24, 2010
A demonstrator shows a "Nunca mais" (never again) sticker in his head during a demonstration to conmemorate the second anniversary of the "Prestige" oil spill, in Spain, 2004. Spanish fishermen who took part in a clean-up operation after the Prestige oil tanker spill in 2002 have shown symptoms of chromosomal damage and respiratory problems, a study released Tuesday said.

Spanish fishermen who took part in a clean-up operation after the Prestige oil tanker spill in 2002 have shown symptoms of chromosomal damage and respiratory problems, a study released Tuesday said.

The study, conducted by Spanish researchers between September 2004 and February 2005 on 501 fishermen who helped clean up Europe's worst oil spill, was published in the American review .

On November 19, 2002 Liberian-flagged oil tanker the Prestige broke up and sank off Galicia in northwestern Spain, a region famed for its pristine coastline and ecological diversity.

The ship spewed 64,000 tonnes of thick, heavy fuel oil into the waters, polluting thousands of kilometres (miles) along the Atlantic coast of France, Spain and Portugal.

The Spanish study said "those who participated in the clean-up had a higher prevalence of , higher levels of markers suggestive of airway injury in exhaled breath condensate, and chromosomal alterations in compared with those who did not participate in clean-up activities."

It said "chromosomal damage in circulating lymphocytes is an early marker of genotoxicity associated with increased risk for cancer."

It concluded that "participation in clean-up of a major oil spill seemed to have ."

But it warned that "the study does not prove that oil exposure caused the abnormalities."

And it said "the findings cannot be extrapolated to spills of other types of oil" and "therefore cannot predict what effects individuals exposed to other , such as that in the and elsewhere, might experience."

But the researchers urged that "the authorities responsible for organizing (oil) clean-up operations take appropriate measures to guarantee the health protection of those involved in the clean-up activities and establish registries to systematically assess possible adverse health outcomes in exposed workers over time."

Related Stories

Recommended for you

One in 4 women and 1 in 6 men aged 65+ will be physically disabled in Europe by 2047

October 23, 2017
By 2047 one in four women and one in six men aged 65 and above is expected to be living with a physical disability that will severely restrict everyday activities, reveals an analysis published in the online journal BMJ Open.

Protein regulates vitamin A metabolic pathways, prevents inflammation

October 23, 2017
A team of researchers from Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine have discovered how uncontrolled vitamin A metabolism in the gut can cause harmful inflammation. The discovery links diet to inflammatory diseases, ...

New insights into controversial diagnosis of adolescent chronic fatigue

October 23, 2017
Crucial new research could provide some clarity around the controversy surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in adolescents. The research by the Murdoch Children's Research Institute published ...

Do boys really have a testosterone spurt at age four?

October 23, 2017
The idea that four-year-old boys have a spurt of testosterone is often used to explain challenging behaviour at this age.

Our laws don't do enough to protect our health data

October 23, 2017
Have you ever wondered why your computer often shows you ads that seem tailor-made for your interests? The answer is big data. By combing through extremely large datasets, analysts can reveal patterns in your behavior.

New prevention exercise programme to reduce rugby injuries

October 23, 2017
A new dynamic 20-minute exercise programme, performed by rugby players before training and pre-match, could dramatically reduce injuries in the sport according to a benchmark study published today (Sunday 22 October).

2 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gunslingor1
5 / 5 (3) Aug 24, 2010
No surprise here.

Anyone who fears radiation from nuclear plants needs to understand that the effects of fossil fuels are far worse. At least we can contain nuclear waste. We burn fossil and it goes right into the air we breath.
Caliban
3 / 5 (2) Aug 24, 2010
We should have mandated a similar study for the Deepwater cleanup workers, and, essentially for every citizen in the gulf states- or at least representative samples, and probably even deeper inland.

We can expect long term negative health impact from the blowout, cleanup, and aftereffects.

I was reading somewhere recently that almost everyone involved in the hands-on cleanup efforts following the Valdez wreck is already dead.

Some deadly shit, any way you smear it.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.